Advertisement

Understanding the Emergent Structure of Competency Centers in Post-implementation Enterprise Systems

An Assemblage Theory Approach
  • Arun Aryal
  • Redouane El Amrani
  • Duane P. Truex
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 446)

Abstract

Prior research provides conflicting insights about the link between investment in enterprise systems and firm value and in the ES governance mechanisms. The literature generally suggests that management should cultivate its technical and organizational expertise to derive value from currently deployed Enterprise Systems (ES) [8]. In the realm of practice, ERP vendors and configuration/integration partners strongly recommend the creation of an organizational structure to govern the ERP implementation and post-implementation process to improve project success and extract greater value from the ES investment. The ES literature, while unclear on the formation, and functioning of ES governance units, suggests the need for formal and fixed governance structures. This research utilizes Deleuze’s assemblage theory and emergence theory to explain the genesis and evolution of the governing ‘structure’ known as the Competency Center (CC). Our results illustrate the business needs driving the structuring processes behind the CC, are also those that lead to unintended and destabilizing outcomes. Whether the CC ‘assemblage’ survives to provide value depends on how the emergent issues are handled and how the assemblages are “positioned”. This research suggests effective ES governance is not derived from a prescribed step-wise process yielding formal structures, but rather form an organic process of assemblage.

Keywords

assemblage theory competency centers enterprise systems postimplementation 

References

  1. 1.
    Alter, S.: Theory of Workarounds. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 34, 1041–1066 (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barker, T., Frolick, M.N.: ERP Implementation Failure: A Case Study. Information Systems Management 20(4), 43–49 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Benitez-Amado, J., Walczuch, R.M.: Information Technology, the Organizational Capability of Proactive Corporate Environmental Strategy and Firm Performance: A Resource-Based Analysis. European Journal of Information Systems 21(6), 664–679 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bhatt, G.D., Grover, V.: Types of Information Technology Capabilities and Their Role in Competitive Advantage: An Empirical Study. Journal of Management Information Systems 22(2), 253–277 (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carter, M., Takeda, H., Truex, D.: An Epistemology of Organizational Emergence: The Tripartite Domains of Organizational Discourse and the Servitization of IBM. In: Barrett, M., Davidson, E., Middleton, C., DeGross, J.I. (eds.) Information Technology in the Service Economy: Challenges and Possibilities for the 21st Century. IFIP, vol. 267, pp. 367–370. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chae, B., Poole, M.S.: The Surface of Emergence in Systems Development: Agency, Institutions, and Large-Scale Information Systems. European Journal of Information Systems 14(1), 19–36 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Crofts, K., Bisman, J.: Interrogating Accountability: An Illustration of the Use of Leximancer Software for Qualitative Data Analysis. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management 7(2), 180–207 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Davis, J.M., Kettinger, W.J., Kunev, D.: When Users Are IT Experts Too: The Effects of Joint IT Competence and Partnership On Satisfaction With Enterprise-Level Systems Implementation. European Journal of Information Systems 18, 26–37 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    DeLanda, M.: A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity. Continuum (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Deleuze, G., Guattari, F.: A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. University of Minneapolis Press, Minneapolis (1987)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    EL Amrani, R., Aryal, A., Sarkar, S., Truex, D.: The Key Determinants of a Successful Competency Center: It Depends! In: Proceedings of the SIG-Enterprise Systems Pre-ICIS Conference (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Elbashir, M.Z., Collier, P.A., Davern, M.J.: Measuring the Effects of Business Intelligence Systems: The Relationship Between Business Process and Organizational Performance. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 9(3), 135–153 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Eriksen, L.-B., Axline, S., Markus, M.L., Drucker, P.: What Happens After “Going Live” With ERP Systems? In: Competence Centers Can Support Effective Institutionalization. AMCIS 1999 Proceedings, Paper 268, vol. 268 (1999), http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis1999/268
  14. 14.
    Gallagher, K.P., Worrell, J.L., Mason, R.M.: The Negotiation and Selection of Horizontal Mechanisms to Support Post-Implementation ERP Organizations. Information Technology & People 25(1), 4–30 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.L.: The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine, Chicago (1967)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Grabski, S.V., Leech, S.A., Schmidt, P.J.: A Review of ERP Research: A Future Agenda for Accounting Information Systems. Journal of Information Systems 25(1), 37–78 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Granebring, A., Révay, P.: Enterprise Resource Planning Competence Centres: A Case Study. Kybernetes 34(9/10), 1551–1562 (2005)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hopper, P.J.: Emergent Grammar. Berkeley Linguistics Society 13, 139–157 (1987)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hopper, P.J.: Some Recent Trends in Grammaticalization. Annual Review of Anthropology 25, 217–236 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hopper, P.J.: Emergent Grammar. In: Tomasello, M. (ed.) The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure, vol. 1, pp. 155-75. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ and London (1998) Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kallinikos, J.: Deconstructing Information Packages: Organizational and Behavioural Implications of ERP Systems. Information Technology and People 17(1), 8–30 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kholeif, A.O., Abdel-Kader, M., Sherer, M.: ERP Customization Failure: Institutionalized Accounting Practices, Power Relations and Market Forces. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change 3(3), 250–269 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lee, A.S.: A Scientific Methodology for MIS Case Studies. MIS Quarterly 13(1), 33–50 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lee, A.S., Baskerville, R.L.: Generalizing Generalizability in Information Systems Research. Information Systems Research 14(3), 221–243 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Marcus, G.E., Saka, E.: Assemblage. Theory, Culture & Society 23, 101–106 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M.: Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Sage (1994)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Newell, S., Tansley, C., Huang, J.: Social Capital and Knowledge Integration in an ERP Project Team: The Importance of Bridging and Bonding. British Journal of Management 15(S1), S43-S57 (2004)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Penn-Edwards, S.: Computer Aided Phenomenography: The Role of Leximancer Computer Software in Phenomenographic Investigation. Qualitative Report 15(2), 252–267 (2010)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Strauss, A., Corbin, J.: Basics of Qualitative Research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA (1998)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Truex, D.: ERP Systems as Facilitating and Confounding Factors in Corporate Mergers: The Case of Two Canadian Telecommunications Companies. Systemes d’Information et Managemen 1(6), 7–21 (2001)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Truex, D.P., Baskerville, R.: Deep Structure or Emergence Theory: Contrasting Theoretical Foundations for Information Systems Development. Information Systems Journal 8(2), 99–118 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Truex, D.P., Baskerville, R., Klein, H.: Growing Systems in Emergent Organizations. Communications of the ACM 42(8), 117–123 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Truex, D.P., Klein, H.K.: A Rejection of Structure as a Basis for Information Systems Development. In: Stamper, R.K., Kerola, P., Lee, R., Lyytinen, K. (eds.) Collaborative Work, Social Communications and Information Systems, pp. 213–236. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1991)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Volkoff, O., Elmes, M.B., Strong, D.M.: Enterprise Systems, Knowledge Transfer and Power Users. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 13(4), 279–304 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Worrell, J., Gallagher, K., Mason, R.: Understanding the Structure of Post-Implementation ERP Teams. In: AMCIS 2006 Proceedings, Paper 307 (2006), http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2006/307

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arun Aryal
    • 1
  • Redouane El Amrani
    • 2
  • Duane P. Truex
    • 1
  1. 1.Georgia State UniversityAtlantaUSA
  2. 2.NEOMA Business SchoolReimsFrance

Personalised recommendations