Advertisement

Abstract

Organizational researchers have acknowledged that understanding the relationship between technology and organization is crucial to understanding modern organizing and organizational change [1]. There has been a significant amount of debate concerning the theoretical foundation of this relationship. Our research draws and extends Deleuze and DeLanda’s work on assemblages and Callon’s concept of performation to investigate how different sociomaterial practices are changed and stabilized after the implementation of new technology. Our findings from an in-depth study of two ambulatory clinics within a hospital system indicate that “perform-ing” of constituting, counter-performing, calibrating, and stratifying explained the process of sociomaterial change and that this process is governed by an overarching principle of “performative exigency”. Future studies on sociomateriality and change may benefit from a deeper understanding of how sociomaterial assemblages are rendered performative.

Keywords

sociomateriality assemblage performation healthcare IT 

References

  1. 1.
    Zammuto, R., Griffith, T., Majchrzak, A., Dougherty, D., Faraj, S.: Information Technology and the Changing Fabric of Organization. Organization Science 18(5), 749–762 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Leonardi, P.M., Nardi, B.A., Kallinikos, J.: Materiality and Organizing Social Interaction in a Technological World. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Orlikowski, W.J.: The Sociomateriality of Organisational Life: Considering Technology on Management Research. Cambridge Journal of Economics 34(1), 125–141 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Orlikowski, W., Scott, S.: Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization. Academy of Management Annals 2(1), 433–474 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Scott, S., Orlikowski, W.: Reconfiguring Relations of Accountability: Materialization of Social Media in the Travel Sector. Accounting, Organizations and Society 37, 26–40 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Faraj, S., Azad, B.: The Materiality of Technology: An Affordance Perspective. In: Leonardi, P.M., Nardi, B., Kallinikos, J. (eds.) Materiality and Organizing: Social Interaction in a Technological World, pp. 237-258. University of Michigan Press (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    DeLanda, M.: A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity. Continuum (2006) Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Callon, M.: What Does It Mean to Say that Economics Is Performative? In: MacKenzie, D., Muniesa, F., Siu, L. (eds.) Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics, pp. 310–357. Princeton University Press (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    MacKenzie, D., Muniesa, F., Siu, L.: Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics. Princeton University Press (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Deleuze, G., Guattari, F.: What Is Philosophy? Columbia University Press (1994)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Barad, K.: Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter. Signs 28(3), 801–831 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kautz, K., Jensen, T.B.: Sociomateriality at the Royal Court of IS. Information and Organization 23(1), 15–27 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Leonardi, P.: Theoretical Foundations for the Study of Sociomateriality. Information and Organization 23(2), 59–76 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Leonardi, P., Barley, S.: Materiality and Change: Challenges to Building Better Theory about Technology and Organizing. Information and Organization 18(3), 159–176 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Leonardi, P.: When Flexible Routines Meet Flexible Technologies: Affordance, Constraint, and the Imbrication of Human and Material Agencies. MIS Quarterly 35(1), 147–167 (2011)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pickering, A.: The Mangle of Practice: Agency and Emergence in the Sociology of Science. American Journal of Sociology 99(3), 559–589 (1993)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Callon, M., Muniesa, F.: Economic Markets as Calculative Collective Devices. Organization Studies 26(8), 1229–1250 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Law, J., Singleton, V.: Performing Technology’s Stories: On Social Constructivism, Performance, and Performativity. Technology and Culture 41(4), 765–775 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Knorr-Cetina, K.: Tinkering toward Success: Prelude to a Theory of Scientific Practice. Theory and Society 8, 347–376 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Riemer, K., Johnston, R.S.: Place-Making: A Phenomenological Theory of Technology Appropriation. In: ICIS 2012 Proceedings (2012), http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2012/proceedings/SocialImpacts/5/
  21. 21.
    Nicolini, D.: The Work to Make Telemedicine Work: A Social and Articulative View. Social Science & Medicine 62(11), 2754–2767 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fujimura, J.: Crafting Science: A Sociohistory of the Quest for the Genetics of Cancer. Harvard University Press (1996)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Law, J.: On the Methods of Long-Distance Control: Vessels, Navigation and the Portuguese Route to India. In: Law, J. (ed.) Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge, pp. 234–263. Routledge and Keegan, London (1986)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Oborn, E., Barrett, M., Davidson, E.: Unity in Diversity: Electronic Patient Record Use in Multidisciplinary Practice. Information Systems Research 22(3), 547–564 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yin, R.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage (2003)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Schatzki, T.R.: Introduction: Practice Theory. In: Schatzki, T.R., Knorr-Cetina, K., von Savigny, E. (eds.) The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, pp. 10-23. Routledge (2001)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA): Standards and Guidelines for Physician Practice Connections – Patient-Centered Medical Home (PPC-PCMH). National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA), Washintgon, DC (2008)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Charmaz, K.: Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guided Through Qualitative Analysis, 3rd edn. Sage (2006) Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Miller, P., Power, M.: Accounting, Organizing, and Economizing. Academy of Management Annals 7(1), 555–603 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Scott, S., Orlikowski, W.: Sociomateriality – Taking the Wrong Turning? A Response to Mutch. Information and Organization 23(2), 77–80 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Barrett, M., Oborn, E., Orlikowski, W., Yates, J.: Reconfiguring Boundary Relations: Robotic Innovations in Pharmacy Work. Organization Science 23(5), 1448–1466 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kjellberg, H.: The Death of a Salesman? Reconfiguring Economic Exchange in Swedish Post-War Food Distribution. In: Callon, M., Millo, Y., Muniesa, F. (eds.) Market Devices, pp. 65–91. Blackwell, Malden (2007)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hanseth, O., Braa, K.: Hunting for the Treasure at the End of the Rainbow: Standardizing Corporate IT Infrastructure. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 10(3/4), 261–292 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hanseth, O., Monteiro, E., Hatling, M.: Developing Information Infrastructure: The Tension between Standardization and Flexibility. Science, Technology, & Human Values 21(4), 407–426 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Star, S., Ruhleder, K.: Steps Toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces. Information Systems Research 7(1), 111–134 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Phillips, N., Oswick, C.: Organizational Discourse: Domains, Debates, and Directions. Academy of Management Annals 6(1), 435–481 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Leonardi, P., Barley, S.: What’s Under Construction Here? Social Action, Materiality, and Power in Constructivist Studies of Technology and Organizing. Academy of Management Annals 4(1), 1–51 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Orlikowski, W.: Improvising Organizational Transformation over Time: A Situated Change Perspective. Information Systems Research 7(1), 63–92 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ciborra, C.: From Control to Drift. Oxford Publishing Press (2000)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Latour, B.: Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1999)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Jones, M.: Information Systems and the Double Mangle: Steering a Course between the Scylla of Embedded Structure and the Charybdis of Strong Symmetry. In: Larsen, T.J., Levine, L., DeGross, J. (eds.) Information Systems: Current Issues and Future Changes, pp. 287–302. IFIP Press (1998)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Millo, Y.: Making Things Deliverable: The Origins of Index‐Based Derivatives. In: Callon, M., Millo, Y., Muniesa, F. (eds.) Market Devices, pp. 196–214. Blackwell, Malden (2007)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Barley, S.: Technology as an Occasion for Structuring: Evidence from Observations of CT Scanners and the Social Order of Radiology Departments. Administrative Science Quarterly 31(1), 78–108 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Zuboff, S.: In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power. Basic Books (1988)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    D’Adderio, L.: The Performativity of Routines: Theorising the Influence of Artefacts and Distributed Agencies on Routines Dynamics. Research Policy 37(5), 769–789 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adrian Yeow
    • 1
  • Samer Faraj
    • 2
  1. 1.SIM UniversitySingapore
  2. 2.Desautels Faculty of ManagementMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations