Advertisement

Reconfiguring Early Childhood Education and Care

A Sociomaterial Analysis of IT Appropriation
  • Melinda Plumb
  • Karlheinz Kautz
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 446)

Abstract

Existing studies of IT within early childhood education and care settings are scant, and those that do exist traditionally utilise a Cartesian worldview where humans and IT are separate self-sufficient entities with properties. In this worldview, change is attributed to either the technological or the human entity, leading to limited, either techno-centric or human-centred accounts of IT implementation and use. We reframe the activities in an early childhood organisation as a process of appropriation, and utilise a sociomaterial theory of technology appropriation alternative to the Cartesian worldview. We contribute a rich account of the changes that occur to the practices, the educators, and the technology itself during the appropriation process and demonstrate the theory’s usefulness as an analytical tool for providing a deeper understanding of how early childhood educators appropriate a new technology into their practices in a sociomaterial, non-dualistic way.

Keywords

technology appropriation early childhood educators sociomateriality 

References

  1. 1.
    Bolstad, R.: The Role and Potential of ICT in Early Childhood Education – A Review of New Zealand and International Literature (2004), http://www.nzcer.org.nz/
  2. 2.
    Plumb, M., Kautz, K., Tootell, H.: Touch Screen Technology Adoption and Utilisation by Educators in Early Childhood Educational Institutions: A Review of the Literature. In: Proceedings of the 24th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Melbourne (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Orlikowski, W.J.: Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring Technology at Work. Organization Studies 28(9), 1435–1448 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhao, Y., Pugh, K., Sheldon, S., Byers, J.: Conditions for Classroom Technology Innovations. Teachers College Record 104(3), 482–515 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mendoza, A., Carroll, J., Stern, L.: Software Appropriation over Time: From Adoption to Stabilization and Beyond. Australasian Journal of Information Systems 16(2), 5–23 (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Orlikowski, W.J.: The Sociomateriality of Organisational Life: Considering Technology in Management Research. Cambridge Journal of Economics 34, 125-141 (2010) Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Orlikowski, W.J., Scott, S.V.: Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization. Academy of Management Annals 2(1), 433–474 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Scott, S.V., Orlikowski, W.J.: Getting the Truth: Exploring the Material Grounds Of Institutional Dynamics in Social Media. Working Paper no. 177, London School of Economics and Political Science (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Leonardi, P.M.: Digital Materiality? How Artifacts Without Matter, Matter. First Monday 15(6) (2010), http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3036/2567
  10. 10.
    Leonardi, P.M.: When Flexible Routines Meet Flexible Technologies: Affordance, Constraint, and the Imbrication of Human and Material Agencies. MIS Quarterly 35(1), 147–167 (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Leonardi, P.M., Barley, S.R.: Materiality and Change: Challenges To Building Better Theory about Technology and Organizing. Information and Organization 18, 159–176 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Leonardi, P.M., Barley, S.R.: What Is Under Construction Here? Social Action, Materiality, and Power in Constructivist Studies of Technology and Organizing. Academy of Management Annals 4(1), 1–51 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Leclerq, A., Carugati, A., Giangreco, A., Da Cunha, J.V., Blegnid Jensen, T.: A Sociomaterial View of the Scaffolding of Work Practices with Information Technology. In: ICIS 2009 Proceedings, Paper 197 (2009), http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2009/197
  14. 14.
    Hultin, L., Mähring, M.: Visualizing Institutional Logics in Sociomaterial Practices. In: ICIS 2013 Proceedings (2013), http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2013/proceedings/OrganizationIS/4/
  15. 15.
    Riemer, K., Vehring, N.: It’s Not a Property! Exploring the Sociomateriality of Software Usability. In: ICIS 2010 Proceedings, Paper 215 (2010), http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2010_submissions/215
  16. 16.
    Davidson, E., Vaast, E.: Digital Entrepreneurship and Its Sociomaterial Enactment. In: Proceedings of the 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Science (HICSS), pp. 1–10. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2010)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cecez-Kecmanovic, D., Galliers, R.D., Henfridsson, O., Newell, S., Vidgen, R.: The Sociomateriality of Information Systems: Current Status, Future Directions. MIS Quarterly 38(3), 809–830 (2014)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kautz, K., Blegind Jensen, T.: Debating Sociomateriality: Entanglements, Imbrications, Disentangling, and Agential Cuts. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 24(2), 89–96 (2012)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kautz, K., Blegind Jensen, T.: Sociomateriality at the Royal Court of IS: A Jester’s Monologue. Information and Organization 23(1), 15–27 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Poole, M.S., DeSanctis, G.: Use of Group Decision Support Systems as an Appropriation Process. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), vol. 4, pp. 149–157. IEEE (1989)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    DeSanctis, G., Poole, M.S.: Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory. Organization Science 5(2), 121-147 (1994) Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Draxler, S., Stevens, G.: Supporting the Collaborative Appropriation of an Open Software Ecosystem. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 20 (4-5), 403-448 (2011) Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Riemer, K., Johnston, R.B.: Place-Making: A Phenomenological Theory of Technology Appropriation. In: ICIS 2012 Proceedings (2012), http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2012/proceedings/SocialImpacts/5/
  24. 24.
    Heidegger, M.: Sein Und Zeit. Neomarius Verlagg, Tübingen (1927) Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Heidegger, M.: Being and Time. Macquarrie, J., Robinson, E. (trans.). SCM Press, London (1962) Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Riemer, K., Johnston, R.B.: Artifact or Equipment? Rethinking the Core of IS Using Heidegger’s Ways of Being. In: ICIS 2011 Proceedings, Paper 5 (2011), http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2011/proceedings/researchmethods/5
  27. 27.
    Piper, A.M., D’Angelo, S., Hollan, J.: Going Digital: Understanding Paper and Photo Documentation Practices in Early Childhood Education. In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), San Antonio, TX, pp. 1319–1328. ACM, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Department of Education: Belonging, Being & Becoming: The Early Years Learning Framework for Australia. Australian Government Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (2009) Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Riemer, K., Johnston, R.B.: What is IT in Use and Why Does It Matter for IS Design? Systems, Signs & Actions 7(1), 5–21 (2013)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Riemer, K., Johnston, R.B., Hovorka, D., Indulska, M.: Challenging the Philosophical Foundations of Modeling Organizational Reality: The Case of Process Modeling. In: ICIS 2013 Proceedings (2013), http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2013/proceedings/BreakthroughIdeas/4/
  31. 31.
    Riemer, K., Frößler, F., Klein, S.: Real Time Communication – Modes of Use in Distributed Teams. In: ECIS 2007 Proceedings, Paper 56 (2007), http://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2007/56

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Melinda Plumb
    • 1
  • Karlheinz Kautz
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of BusinessUniversity of WollongongWollongongAustralia

Personalised recommendations