Classification Based on Lower Integral and Extreme Learning Machine

Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 481)

Abstract

It is known that the non-linear integral has been generally used as an aggregation operator in classification problems, because it represents the potential interaction of a group of attributes. The lower integral is a type of non-linear integral with respect to non-additive set functions, which represents the minimum potential of efficiency for a group of attributes with interaction. Through solving a linear programming problem, the value of lower integral could be calculated. When we consider the lower integral as a classifier, the difficult step is the learning of the non-additive set function, which is used in lower integral. Then, the Extreme Learning Machine technique is applied to solve the problem and the ELM lower integral classifier is proposed in this paper. The implementations and performances of ELM lower integral classifier and single lower integral classifier are compared by experiments with six data sets.

Keywords

Non-linear integral Lower integral Extreme Learning Machine Possibility distribution 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Sugeno, M.: Theory of fuzzy integrals and its applications. Doct. Thesis. Tokyo Institute of Technology (1974)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sugeno, M., Murofushi, T.: Choquet integral as an integral form for a general class of fuzzy measures. In: 2nd IFSA Congress, Tokyo, pp. 408–411 (1987)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wang, Z., Li, W., Lee, K.H., Leung, K.S.: Lower integrals and upper integrals with respect to non-additive set functions. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 159, 646–660 (2008)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Grabisch, M., Sugeno, M.: Multi-attribute classification using fuzzy integral. In: 1st IEEE Int. Conf. on Fuzzy Systems, San Diego, pp. 47–54 (March 8-12, 1992)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tahani, H., Keller, J.M.: Information fusion in computer vision using fuzzy integral. IEEE Trans. SMC 20(3), 733–741 (1990)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Grabisch, M., Nicolas, J.M.: Classification by fuzzy integral. Performance and Tests: Fuzzy Sets and Systems 65, 255–271 (1994)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Grabisch, M.: The application of fuzzy integrals in multicriteria decision making. European Journalof Operational Research 89, 445–456 (1996)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grabisch, M.: Fuzzy integral in multicriteria decision making. Fuzzy Sets and Systems (Special Issue on 5th IFSA Congress) 69, 279–298. (1995)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 1, 3–28 (1978)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Possibility Theory. Plenum Press, New York (1988)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wang, Z., Klir, G.J.: Fuzzy measure theory. New York, Plenum Press (1992)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Huang, G.-B., Zhu, Q.-Y., Siew, C.-K.: Extreme learning machine: Theory and applications. Neurocomputing 70, 489–501 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang, X., Chen, A., Feng, H.: Upper integral network with extreme learning mechanism. Neurocomputing 74, 2520–2525 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chen, A., Liang, Z., Feng, H.: Classification Based on Upper Integral. In: Proceedings of 2011 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics 2, pp. 835–840 (2011) Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Mathematics and Computer ScienceHebei UniversityBaodingChina

Personalised recommendations