Decomposing Alignment-Based Conformance Checking of Data-Aware Process Models
Process mining techniques relate observed behavior to modeled behavior, e.g., the automatic discovery of a Petri net based on an event log. Process mining is not limited to process discovery and also includes conformance checking. Conformance checking techniques are used for evaluating the quality of discovered process models and to diagnose deviations from some normative model (e.g., to check compliance). Existing conformance checking approaches typically focus on the control-flow, thus being unable to diagnose deviations concerning data. This paper proposes a technique to check the conformance of data-aware process models. We use so-called Petri nets with Data to model data variables, guards, and read/write actions. Data-aware conformance checking problem may be very time consuming and sometimes even intractable when there are many transitions and data variables. Therefore, we propose a technique to decompose large data-aware conformance checking problems into smaller problems that can be solved more efficiently. We provide a general correctness result showing that decomposition does not influence the outcome of conformance checking. The approach is supported through ProM plug-ins and experimental results show significant performance improvements. Experiments have also been conducted with a real-life case study, thus showing that the approach is also relevant in real business settings.
KeywordsProcessMining Conformance Checking Divide-and-Conquer Techniques Multi-Perspective Process Modelling
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Process Mining: Discovery, Conformance and Enhancement of Business Processes. Springer (2011)Google Scholar
- 3.Adriansyah, A., van Dongen, B.F., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Conformance checking using cost-based fitness analysis. In: Proceedings of the 15th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC 2011), pp. 55–64. IEEE Computer Society (2011)Google Scholar
- 4.de Leoni, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Aligning event logs and process models for multi-perspective conformance checking: An approach based on integer linear programming. In: Daniel, F., Wang, J., Weber, B. (eds.) BPM 2013. LNCS, vol. 8094, pp. 113–129. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Mannhardt, F., de Leoni, M., Reijers, H.A., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Balanced Multi-Perspective Checking of Process Conformance. BPM Center Report BPM-14-07 (2014)Google Scholar
- 9.Montali, M., Chesani, F., Mello, P., Maggi, F.M.: Towards data-aware constraints in declare. In: Shin, S.Y., Maldonado, J.C. (eds.) SAC, pp. 1391–1396. ACM (2013)Google Scholar
- 10.Jensen, K., Kristensen, L.: Coloured Petri Nets. Springer (2009)Google Scholar
- 11.Polyvyanyy, A.: Structuring process models. PhD thesis, University of Potsdam (2012)Google Scholar
- 15.de Leoni, M., Munoz-Gama, J., Carmona, J., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Decomposing Conformance Checking on Petri Nets with Data. BPM Center Report BPM-14-06 (2014)Google Scholar
- 16.Munoz-Gama, J., Carmona, J.: A General Framework for Precision Checking. International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control (IJICIC) 8(7B), 5317–5339 (2012)Google Scholar