Model-Driven Alignment: An Empirical Study

  • Constantinos Giannoulis
  • Jelena Zdravkovic
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 197)

Abstract

Current advancements in the business arena necessitate more than ever before the alignment of The Business and IT in organizations, which has been acknowledged as a complex issue to address. Our research is aimed at systematically addressing the linkage between business strategy and information systems (IS). We propose a model-driven approach for alignment, by leveraging the influence of established business strategy formulations from Strategic Management, and model-driven principles used within IS. The objective of this paper is to present the results of an empirical investigation carried out in Sweden on the linkage seeking to obtain insights from practitioners about the relevance of the problem, as well as of our model-driven proposal to address it.

Keywords

Business Strategy Alignment IS Models UBSMM 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Burns, T., Stalker, G.M.: The Management of Innovation. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign’s Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship. Tavistock, London, UK (1961)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Porter, M.E.: Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press (1985)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kaplan, R., Norton, D.: Strategy maps: Converting intangible assets into tangible outcomes. Harvard Business Press (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Leede, J.D., Looise, J.C., Alders, B.C.: Innovation, improvement and operations: an exploration of the management of alignment. International Journal of Technology Management 23(4), 353–368 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ross, J.W., Weill, P., Robertson, D.C.: Enterprise architecture as strategy: Creating a foundation for business execution. Harvard Business Press (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Henderson, J.C., Venkatraman, N.: Strategic alignment: a framework for strategic information technology management (1989)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Luftman, J.N., Bullen, C.V., Liao, D., Nash, E., Neumann, C.: Managing the information technology resource: Leadership in the information age. Pearson Education Upper Saddle River (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chan, Y.E., Reich, B.H.: It alignment: what have we learned? Journal of Information technology 22(4), 297–315 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Luftman, J., Kempaiah, R., Nash, E.: Key issues for it executives 2004. MIS Quarterly Executive 4(2), 269–285 (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Luftman, J., Derksen, B.: Key issues for it executives 2012: Doing more with less. MIS Quarterly Executive 11(4), 207–218 (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Giannoulis, C.: Model-driven Alignment: Linking Business Strategy with Information Systems. PhD thesis, Stockholm University (May 2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Giannoulis, C., Zdravkovic, J., Petit, M.: Model-driven strategic awareness: From a unified business strategy meta-model (UBSMM) to enterprise architecture. In: Bider, I., Halpin, T., Krogstie, J., Nurcan, S., Proper, E., Schmidt, R., Soffer, P., Wrycza, S. (eds.) EMMSAD 2012 and BPMDS 2012. LNBIP, vol. 113, pp. 255–269. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Forum: The open group architectural framework (togaf) version 9.1. Technical report, The Open Group (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zachman, J.A.: A framework for information systems architecture. IBM Systems Journal 26(3), 276–292 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Versteeg, G., Bouwman, H.: Business architecture: A new paradigm to relate business strategy to ict. Information Systems Frontiers 8(2), 91–102 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stabell, C.B., Fjeldstad, Ø.D.: Configuring value for competitive advantage: on chains, shops, and networks. Strategic Management Journal 19(5), 413–437 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kim, W.C., Mauborgne, R.: Blue Ocean Strategy. Harvard Business Review Press (2004)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chan, Y.E., Sabherwal, R., Thatcher, J.B.: Antecedents and outcomes of strategic is alignment: an empirical investigation. IEEE Transactions Engineering Management 53(1), 27–47 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Champion, R., Moores, T.T.: Exploiting an enterprise model during systems’ requirements capture and analysis. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Requirements Engineering, pp. 208–215. IEEE (1996)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Opdahl, A.L.: Model-supported alignment of information systems architecture. Business strategies for information technology management 28 (2003)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Business Architecture Working Group: Balanced scorecard metamodel. Technical report, The Object Mangement Group, OMG (2010)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    ANSI/AIIM: Standard recommended practice - strategy markup language - part 1: Stratml core. Technical Report 21:2009, American National Standards Institute, ANSI (2009)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Oppenheim, A.N.: Questionnaire design, interviewing and attitude measurement. Continuum International Publishing Group (2000)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Giannoulis, C., Zdravkovic, J., Petit, M.: Model-centric strategy-IT alignment: An empirical study in progress. In: Franch, X., Soffer, P. (eds.) CAiSE Workshops 2013. LNBIP, vol. 148, pp. 146–155. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Constantinos Giannoulis
    • 1
  • Jelena Zdravkovic
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer and Systems SciencesStockholm University ForumKistaSweden

Personalised recommendations