The Effect of Familiar and Fantasy Aesthetics on Learning and Experience of Serious Games

  • Erik D. van der Spek
  • Tatiana Sidorenkova
  • Paul Porskamp
  • Matthias Rauterberg
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8770)

Abstract

Serious games have shown potential as learning material, but are not very engaging. One reason why games are considered to be fun is their ability to provide us with an interesting fantasy world to explore and play in, but this seems at odds with the more serious nature of formal training. In this study, a two by two (familiar versus unfamiliar visual setting and familiar versus unfamiliar story setting) single-blind experiment (N=60) was performed, testing the effect of the familiarity of aesthetics on game experience and learning. Significant effects of story condition on learning and game experience was found, with a familiar story setting leading to better learning, but subdued game experience. Other effects were not significant.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Koster, R.: Theory of Fun for Game Design. O’Reilly Media, Inc. (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sitzmann, T.: A Meta-Analytic Examination of the Instructional Effectiveness of Computer-based Simulation Games. Pers. Psychol., 489–528 (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wouters, P., van Nimwegen, C., van Oostendorp, H., van der Spek, E.D.: A Meta-Analysis of the Cognitive and Motivational Effects of Serious Games. J. Educ. Psychol. 105, 249–265 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Malone, T.W.: Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction. Cogn. Sci. 5, 333–369 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Alexander, A., Brunyé, T.: From gaming to training: A review of studies on fidelity, immersion, presence, and buy-in and their effects on transfer in pc-based simulations and games. In: I/ITSEC, pp. 1–14 (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mayer, R.E.: Designing Instruction for Constructivist Learning. In: Reigeluth, C.M. (ed.) Instructional-design Theories and Models, vol. 2, pp. 141–159. Erlbaum, Mahwah (1999)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dickey, M.D.: Murder on Grimm Isle: The impact of game narrative design in an educational game-based learning environment. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 42, 456–469 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Campion, N., Martins, D., Wilhelm, A.: Contradictions and Predictions: Two Sources of Uncertainty That Raise the Cognitive Interest of Readers. Discourse Process. 46, 341–368 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    van der Spek, E.D., van Oostendorp, H., Ch. Meyer, J.-J.: Introducing surprising events can stimulate deep learning in a serious game. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 44, 156–169 (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wouters, P., Van Oostendorp, H., Boonekamp, R., Van Der Spek, E.: The role of Game Discourse Analysis and curiosity in creating engaging and effective serious games by implementing a back story and foreshadowing. Interact. Comput. 23, 329–336 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gunter, G.A., Kenny, R.F., Vick, E.H.: Taking educational games seriously: Using the RETAIN model to design endogenous fantasy into standalone educational games. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 56, 511–537 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Paras, B., Bizzocchi, J.: Game, motivation, and effective learning: An integrated model for educational game design. In: Proceedings of DiGRA 2005 (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schell, J.: The Art of Game Design: A book of lenses. CRC Press (2008)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
    Wouters, P., Van der Spek, E.D., Van Oostendorp, H.: Measuring learning in serious games: a case study with structural assessment. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 59, 741–763 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Poels, K., de Kort, Y., IJsselsteijn, W.: It is always a lot of fun!: exploring dimensions of digital game experience using focus group methodology. In: Proceedings of the 2007 Conference on Future Play, pp. 83–89 (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erik D. van der Spek
    • 1
  • Tatiana Sidorenkova
    • 1
  • Paul Porskamp
    • 2
  • Matthias Rauterberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Eindhoven University of TechnologyEindhovenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.T-XchangeEnschedeThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations