Meeting Educational Objectives in the Affective and Cognitive Domains: Personal and Social Constructivist Perspectives on Enjoyment, Motivation and Learning Chemistry

  • Keith S. Taber


Constructivist ideas about learning have been highly influential in science education over several decades. Debate continues between some educational scholars about the value of constructivism as the basis for informing effective instruction. However, in teaching the sciences, some core constructivist ideas have largely been accepted and indeed commonly even become taken for granted. Most commonly, constructivist accounts focus on learning, either as an individual act of knowledge construction or as participation within a community of practice, and have tended to relate to issues of knowledge and/or authenticity that reflect a cognitive focus. This chapter revisits constructivist ideas about learning to ask what they can offer when considering educational objectives in the affective domain. It is argued that guidance that largely derives from cognitive perspectives on learning often also makes good sense when our focus is on affect. It is suggested that the traditional emphasis of research within the constructivist research programme on what is learnt should be supplemented by a simultaneous consideration of how learning activities are experienced by the students.


Science Education Conceptual Change Educational Objective Constructivist Perspective Chemistry Teacher 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Ainley, M. (2006). Connecting with learning: motivation, affect and cognition in interest processes. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 391–405. doi: 10.1007/s10648-006-9033-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  3. Ausubel, D. P. (2000). The acquisition and retention of knowledge: A cognitive view. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baddeley, A. D. (2003). Working memory: Looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4(10), 829–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bektas, O., & Taber, K. S. (2009). Can science pedagogy in English schools inform educational reform in Turkey? Exploring the extent of constructivist teaching in a curriculum context informed by constructivist principles. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 6(3), 66–80.Google Scholar
  6. Bickhard, M. H. (1998). Constructivism and relativism: A shoppers guide. In M. R. Matthews (Ed.), Constructivism in science education: A philosophical examination (pp. 99–112). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bloom, B. S. (1968). The cognitive domain. In L. H. Clark (Ed.), Strategies and tactics in secondary school teaching: A book of readings (pp. 49–55). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  8. Bloom, B. S. (1972). Innocence in education. The School Review, 80(3), 333–352. doi: 10.2307/1084408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bodner, G. M. (1986). Constructivism: A theory of knowledge. Journal of Chemical Education, 63(10), 873–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bodner, G. M., Klobuchar, M., Geelan, D. (2001). The many forms of constructivism. Journal of Chemical Education 78(Online Symposium: Piaget, Constructivism, and Beyond):1107.Google Scholar
  11. Brock, R. (2006). Intuition and integration: Insights from intuitive students (M.Phil. thesis, Faculty of Education. University of Cambridge, Cambridge).Google Scholar
  12. Chalmers, A. F. (1982). What is this thing called science? (2nd ed.). Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Cole, R., Becker, N., Towns, M., Sweeney, G., Wawro, M., & Rasmussen, C. (2012). Adapting a methodology from mathematics education research to chemistry education research: documenting collective activity. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(1), 193–211. doi: 10.1007/s10763-011-9284-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Coll, R. K., & Taylor, T. G. N. (2001). Using constructivism to inform chemistry pedagogy. Chemistry Education: Research & Practice in Europe, 2(3), 215–226.Google Scholar
  15. Collins, H. (2010). Tacit and explicit knowledge. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cornwall, M. (1987). The social bases of religion: A study of factors influencing religious belief and commitment. Review of Religious Research, 29(1), 44–56. doi: 10.2307/3511951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: HarperPerennial.Google Scholar
  18. Driver, R. (1983). The pupil as scientist? Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Driver, R., & Easley, J. (1978). Pupils and paradigms: A review of literature related to concept development in adolescent science students. Studies in Science Education, 5, 61–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Driver, R., & Erickson, G. (1983). Theories-in-action: Some theoretical and empirical issues in the study of students’ conceptual frameworks in science. Studies in Science Education, 10, 37–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPping into argumentation: developments in the application of Toulmin’s argument pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88(915–933).Google Scholar
  23. Fensham, P. J. (2004). Defining an identity: The evolution of science education as a field of research. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gilbert, J. K., Osborne, R. J., & Fensham, P. J. (1982). Children’s science and its consequences for teaching. Science Education, 66(4), 623–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gilbert, J. K., & Watts, D. M. (1983). Concepts, misconceptions and alternative conceptions: Changing perspectives in science education. Studies in Science Education, 10(1), 61–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gould, S. J. (1992). The mismeasure of man. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  27. Grandy, R. E. (1998). Constructivisms and objectivity: Disentangling metaphysics from pedagogy. In M. R. Matthews (Ed.), Constructivism in science education: A philosophical examination (pp. 113–123). Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Haidet, P., & Stein, H. F. (2006). The role of the student-teacher relationship in the formation of physicians. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 21(S1), S16–S20. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00304.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hennessy, S. (1993). Situated cognition and cognitive apprenticeship: Implications for classroom learning. Studies in Science Education, 22, 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Herron, J. D., Cantu, L., Ward, R., & Srinivasan, V. (1977). Problems associated with concept analysis. Science Education, 61(2), 185–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jong, T. (2010). Cognitive load theory, educational research, and instructional design: Some food for thought. Instructional Science, 38(2), 105–134. doi: 10.1007/s11251-009-9110-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1996). Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  33. Kelly, G. (1963). A theory of personality: The psychology of personal constructs. New York: W W Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  34. Kleine-Staarman, J., & Mercer, N. (2010). The guided construction of knowledge: Talk between teachers and students. In K. Littleton, C. Wood, & J. K. Kleine-Staarman (Eds.), International handbook of research of psychology in education (pp. 75–104). Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar
  35. Kohlberg, L., & Hersh, R. H. (1977). Moral development: A review of the theory. Theory Into Practice, 16(2), 53–59. doi: 10.1080/00405847709542675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Koltko-Rivera, M. E. (2006). Rediscovering the later version of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs: Self-transcendence and opportunities for theory, research, and unification. Review of General Psychology, 10(4), 302–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. B. (1968). The affective domain. In L. H. Clark (Ed.), Strategies and tactics in secondary school teaching: A book of readings (pp. 41–49). New York: The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
  38. Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kusurkar, R. A., Ten Cate, T. J., van Asperen, M., & Croiset, G. (2011). Motivation as an independent and a dependent variable in medical education: A review of the literature. Medical Teacher, 33(5), e242–e262. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.558539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). The metaphorical structure of the human conceptual system. Cognitive Science, 4(2), 195–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated cognition: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lavigne, G. L., & Vallerand, R. J. (2010). The dynamic processes of influence between contextual and situational motivation: A test of the hierarchical model in a science education setting. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(9), 2343–2359. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00661.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Leach, J., & Scott, P. (2002). Designing and evaluating science teaching sequences: An approach drawing upon the concept of learning demand and a social constructivist perspective on learning. Studies in Science Education, 38, 115–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lewis, S. E., Shaw, J. L., Heitz, J. O., & Webster, G. H. (2009). Attitude counts: Self-concept and success in general chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 86(6), 744. doi: 10.1021/ed086p744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Liang, L. L., & Gabel, D. L. (2005). Effectiveness of a constructivist approach to science instruction for prospective elementary teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 27(10), 1143–1162. doi: 10.1080/09500690500069442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Losee, J. (1993). A historical introduction to the philosophy of science (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Luria, A. R. (1976). Cognitive development: Its cultural and social foundations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Lynch, D., & Trujillo, H. (2011). Motivational beliefs and learning strategies in organic chemistry. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(6), 1351–1365. doi: 10.1007/s10763-010-9264-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Marsh, H. W., & Martin, A. J. (2011). Academic self-concept and academic achievement: Relations and causal ordering. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(1), 59–77. doi: 10.1348/000709910x503501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Maslow, A. H. (1970). Religions, values, and peak-experiences. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  52. Mathy, F., & Feldman, J. (2012). What’s magic about magic numbers? Chunking and data compression in short-term memory. Cognition, 122(3), 346–362. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.11.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Matthews, M. R. (1993). Constructivism and science education: Some epistemological problems. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2(1), 359–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Matthews, M. R. (1994). Discontent with constructivism. Studies in Science Education, 24, 165–172. doi: 10.1080/03057269408560045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Matthews, M. R. (Ed.). (1998). Constructivism in science education: A philosophical examination. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  56. McClary, L. M., & Bretz, S. L. (2012). Development and assessment of a diagnostic tool to identify organic chemistry students’ alternative conceptions related to acid strength. International Journal of Science Education, 34(15), 2317–2341. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2012.684433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mosher, M. D., Mosher, M. W., & Garoutte, M. P. (2012). Organic mastery: An activity for the undergraduate classroom. Journal of Chemical Education, 89(5), 646–648. doi: 10.1021/ed200015v.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Nakamura, J. (1988). Optimal experience and the uses of talent. In M. Csikszentmihalyi & I. S. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness (pp. 319–326). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Osborne, R. J., & Wittrock, M. C. (1983). Learning science: A generative process. Science Education, 67(4), 489–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Osborne, R. J., & Wittrock, M. C. (1985). The generative learning model and its implications for science education. Studies in Science Education, 12, 59–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Perry, W. G. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  62. Peterson, C., & Park, N. (2010). What happened to self-actualization? Commentary on Kenrick et al. (2010). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(3), 320–322. doi: 10.1177/1745691610369471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Phillips, D. C. (Ed.). (2000). Constructivism in education: Opinions and second opinions on controversial issues. Chicago, IL: National Society for the Study of Education.Google Scholar
  64. Piaget, J. (1929/1973). The child’s conception of the World (trans: Tomlinson J, Tomlinson A). St. Albans: Granada.Google Scholar
  65. Piaget, J. (1970/1972). The principles of genetic epistemology (trans: Mays W). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  66. Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., & Boyle, R. A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63(2), 167–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Ryan, B. J. (2013). Line up, line up: Using technology to align and enhance peer learning and assessment in a student centred foundation organic chemistry module. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(3), 229–238. doi: 10.1039/c3rp20178c.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Scerri, E. R. (2003). Philosophical confusion in chemical education research. Journal of Chemical Education, 80(20), 468–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Schutz, A., & Luckmann, T. (1973). The structures of the life-World (trans: Zaner RM, Engelhardt HT). Evanston, IL: Northwest University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Scott, P. H. (1998). Teacher talk and meaning making in science classrooms: A review of studies from a Vygotskian perspective. Studies in Science Education, 32, 45–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Silvia, P. J. (2008). Interest—the curious emotion. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(1), 57–60. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00548.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Smardon, R. (2009). Sociocultural and cultural-historical frameworks for science education. In W.-M. Roth & K. Tobin (Eds.), The world of science education: Handbook of research in North America (The World of Science Education, Vol. 1, pp. 15–25). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  73. Solomon, J. (1983). Learning about energy: How pupils think in two domains. European Journal of Science Education, 5(1), 49–59. doi: 10.1080/0140528830050105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Solomon, J. (1992). Getting to know about energy—in school and society. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  75. Strong, K., & Hutchins, H. (2009). Connectivism: A theory for learning in a world of growing complexity Impact. Journal of Applied Research in Workplace E-learning, 1(1), 53–67.Google Scholar
  76. Taber, K. S. (1998). An alternative conceptual framework from chemistry education. International Journal of Science Education, 20(5), 597–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Taber, K. S. (2000). Chemistry lessons for universities?: A review of constructivist ideas. University Chemistry Education, 4(2), 26–35.Google Scholar
  78. Taber, K. S. (2001). Building the structural concepts of chemistry: Some considerations from educational research. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe, 2(2), 123–158.Google Scholar
  79. Taber, K. S. (2002). Chemical misconceptions—Prevention, diagnosis and cure: Theoretical background (Vol. 1). London: Royal Society of Chemistry.Google Scholar
  80. Taber, K. S. (2003). Examining structure and context—questioning the nature and purpose of summative assessment. School Science Review, 85(311), 35–41.Google Scholar
  81. Taber, K. S. (2006). Beyond constructivism: The Progressive Research Programme into Learning Science. Studies in Science Education, 42, 125–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Taber, K. S. (2009). Progressing science education: Constructing the scientific research programme into the contingent nature of learning science. Dordrecht: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-90-481-2431-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Taber, K. S. (2010a). Constructivism and direct instruction as competing instructional paradigms: An essay review of Tobias and Duffy’s constructivist instruction: Success or failure? Education Review, 13(8), 1–44.Google Scholar
  84. Taber, K. S. (2010b). Straw men and false dichotomies: Overcoming philosophical confusion in chemical education. Journal of Chemical Education, 87(5), 552–558. doi: 10.1021/ed8001623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Taber, K. S. (2011). Constructivism as educational theory: Contingency in learning, and optimally guided instruction. Educational theory. New York: Nova.Google Scholar
  86. Taber, K. S. (2012). Student-generated analogies. Retrieved from Scholar
  87. Taber, K. S. (2013a). A common core to chemical conceptions: Learners’ conceptions of chemical stability, change and bonding. In G. Tsaparlis & H. Sevian (Eds.), Concepts of matter in science education (pp. 391–418). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Taber, K. S. (2013b). Modelling learners and learning in science education: Developing representations of concepts, conceptual structure and conceptual change to inform teaching and research. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Taber, K. S. (Forthcoming). Epistemic relevance and learning chemistry in an academic context: The place of chemistry education in supporting the development of scientific curiosity and intellect. In I. Eilks & A. Hofstein (Eds.), Relevant chemistry education – from theory to practice. Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar
  90. Taber, K. S., & Bricheno, P. A. (2009). Coordinating procedural and conceptual knowledge to make sense of word equations: Understanding the complexity of a ‘simple’ completion task at the learner's resolution. International Journal of Science Education, 31(15), 2021–2055. doi: 10.1080/09500690802326243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Tobias, S., & Duffy, T. M. (Eds.). (2009). Constructivist instruction: Success or failure? New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  92. Tobin, K. (Ed.). (1993). The practice of constructivism in science education. Hilsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  93. Toulmin, S. (2003/1958). The uses of argument, updated edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  94. von Glasersfeld, E. (1989). Cognition, construction of knowledge, and teaching. Synthese, 80(1), 121–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Vygotsky, L. S. (1934/1986). Thought and language. London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  96. Vygotsky, L. S. (1934/1994). The development of academic concepts in school aged children. In: R. van der Veer, J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Vygotsky reader (pp. 355–370). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  97. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  98. Watson, J. B. (1967). What is behaviourism? In J. A. Dyal (Ed.), Readings in psychology: Understanding human behavior (2nd ed., pp. 7–9). New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.Google Scholar
  99. Whitebread, D., & Pino-Pasternak, D. (2010). Metacognition, self-regulation and meta-knowing. In K. Littleton, C. Wood, & J. Kleine-Staarman (Eds.), International handbook of psychology in education (pp. 673–711). Bingley, UK: Emerald.Google Scholar
  100. Wiltgen, B. J., Brown, R. A. M., Talton, L. E., & Silva, A. J. (2004). New circuits for old memories: The role of the neocortex in consolidation. Neuron, 44(1), 101–108. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Yager, R. E. (1995). Constructivism and the learning of science. In S. M. Glynn & R. Duit (Eds.), Learning science in the schools: Research reforming practice (pp. 35–58). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EducationUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations