Key Success-Determinants of Crowdfunded Projects: An Exploratory Analysis

  • Thomas MüllerleileEmail author
  • Dieter William Joenssen
Conference paper
Part of the Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization book series (STUDIES CLASS)


Crowdfunding, a process with which enterprises or individuals seek to secure project funding, has received much attention recently, not only from the media. The boon in visibility provided to crowdfunding by Internet platforms has made securing project funding, by soliciting pledges from potential donors, simpler than ever. A popular way of allocating funding, and thus bypassing traditional venture capital providers, is by setting a reserve pledge-sum. If this pledge-sum is achieved, the promised pledges are collected from the project supporters. Upon project completion, these pledgers receive a compensation, which is usually non-monetary and based on the magnitude of their contribution. Projects funded in this way include a wide topic variety, ranging from hardware manufacturing to fine arts and even disaster relief. This study investigates possible key success factors for attaining the reserve pledge-sum. To this end, data on 45,400 crowdfunding campaigns was collected and key success factors were analyzed using the results of a logistic-regression. The results indicate that communications and professionalism have a high impact on funding success, and that such communication measures as having a unique website set a minimum standard. Further conclusions allow practitioners to positively influence the campaign outcome and researchers to build upon the results of this study.


  1. Agrawal, A., Catalini, C., & Goldfarb, A. (2011). The geography of crowdfunding. Working Paper No. 10-08, NET Institute.Google Scholar
  2. Belleflamme, P., Lambert, T., & Schwienbacher, A. (2011). Crowdfunding: Tapping the right crowd. CORE Discussion Paper, 2011/32.Google Scholar
  3. Cellan-Jones, R. (2013). Fast fibre: A community shows the way. Accessed 28 July 2013.
  4. Hemer, J. (2011). A snapshot on crowdfunding. Working Papers Firms and Region No. R2/2011, Frauenhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research.Google Scholar
  5. Kickstarter (2013). Kickstarter stats. www.kickstarter/help/stats. Accessed 21 February 2014.
  6. Kuppuswamy, V., & Bayus, B. L. (2013). Crowdfunding creative ideas: The dynamics of project backers in kickstarter. Working Paper. Accessed 28 July 2013.Google Scholar
  7. Ley, A., & Weaven, S. (2011). Exploring agency dynamics of crowdfunding in start-up capital financing. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 17, 85–110.Google Scholar
  8. Long, J. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks: Sage.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Mcfadden, D. (1973). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In P. Zarembka (Ed.), Frontiers in econometrics (pp. 105–142). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  10. Mcfadden, D. (1978). Quantitative methods for analyzing travel behaviour of individuals: Some recent developments. In D. Hensher & P. Stopher (Eds.), Behavioural travel modelling (pp. 279–318). London: Croom Helm London.Google Scholar
  11. Menard, S. W. (1995). Applied logistic regression analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Nagelkerke, N. J. D. (1991). A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika, 78, 691–693.CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. Ordanini, A., Miceli, L., Pizzetti, M., & Parasuraman, A. (2011). Crowdfunding: Transforming customers into investors through innovative service platforms. Journal of Service Management, 22, 443–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pope, N. (2011). Crowdfunding microstartups: It’s time for the securities and exchange commission to approve a small offering exemption. Journal of Business Law, 13, 101–129.Google Scholar
  15. Wojciechowski, A. (2009). Models of charity donations and project funding in social networks. Computer Science, 5872, 454–463.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ilmenau University of TechnologyIlmenauGermany

Personalised recommendations