Seeding the Design Process for Future Problems

  • Peter Newman
  • Stephen Forshaw
  • Will Simm
  • Maria Angela Ferrario
  • Jon Whittle
  • Adrian Friday
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8742)

Abstract

Designing with the community brings about a number of benefits, including tacit and contextual knowledge about the problem domain; this is especially apparent in rural settings. However, designing for problems that have yet to embed themselves in the fabric of society (i.e. future problems) poses a number of challenges, as they typically present intangible scenarios and concepts that have yet to be experienced by the wider-community. Using the OnSupply project as a case study, we share our experience in working with the Tiree community to address a future problem through a technology-mediated enquiry. Furthermore, we present a novel process that uses creative workshops augmented with physical artefacts to inform and learn from the community about a problem space, and to seed the design of a system that addresses it.

Keywords

User-driven Creative workshop Design Future problem 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Sanders, E.B.N., Stappers, P.J.: Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. Co-design 4(1), 5–18 (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Siew, S.-T., Yeo, A.W.: Employing participatory action research to augment software development for rural communities. In: Proc. of the 25th BCS Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, BCS-HCI 2011, pp. 171–176. British Computer Society, Swinton (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hunter, G., Ramamoorthy, K.: National airspace strategies for future demand scenarios in inclement weather. In: The 24th Digital Avionics Systems Conference, DASC 2005, vol. 1 ( October 2005) 3.E.2–31–12Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Widen, J.: Correlations between large-scale solar and wind power in a future scenario for sweden. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy 2(2), 177–184 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mancini, C., Rogers, Y., Bandara, A.K., Coe, T., Jedrzejczyk, L., Joinson, A.N., Price, B.A., Thomas, K., Nuseibeh, B.: Contravision: Exploring users’ reactions to futuristic technology. In: Proc. of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2010, pp. 153–162. ACM, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Carroll, J., Rosson, M., Chin, G., Koenemann, J.: Requirements development in scenario-based design. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 24(12), 1156–1170 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Go, K., Takamoto, Y., Carroll, J.: Designing a mobile phone of the future: requirements elicitation using photo essays and scenarios. In: 18th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications, AINA 2004, vol. 2, pp. 475–480 (March 2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    De Bono, E.: Six Thinking Hats. Little, Brown Book Group Limited (1985)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hansen, N.B., Dalsgaard, P.: The productive role of material design artefacts in participatory design events. In: Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Making Sense Through Design, NordiCHI 2012, pp. 665–674. ACM, New York (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Maiden, N., Jones, S.: The rescue requirements engineering process: An integrated user-centred requirements engineering process, version 4.1. Technical report (February 2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vyas, D., Nijholt, A., van der Veer, G.: Supporting cooperative design through ”living” artefacts. In: Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries, NordiCHI 2010, pp. 541–550. ACM, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kolb, D.: Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall (1984)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    UK Government: UK Renewable Energy Roadmap Update 2013 (2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
    Whittle, J., Ochu, E., Ferrario, M.A., Southern, J., McNally, R.: Beyond Research in the Wild: Citizen-Led Research as a Model for Innovation in the Digital Economy. In: Proc. Digital Futures (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Forshaw, S., Cruickshank, L., Dix, A.: Collaborative Communication Tools for Designing: Physical-Cyber Environments. In: Proc. of HCI 2012 - The 26th BCS Conference on Human Computer Interaction (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Newman
    • 1
  • Stephen Forshaw
    • 2
  • Will Simm
    • 1
  • Maria Angela Ferrario
    • 3
  • Jon Whittle
    • 1
  • Adrian Friday
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Computing and CommunicationsLancaster UniversityLancasterUK
  2. 2.Lancaster Institute for the Contemporary ArtsLancaster UniversityLancasterUK
  3. 3.Lancaster University Management SchoolLancaster UniversityLancasterUK

Personalised recommendations