Abstract

Supply chain management is concerned with decisions related to the physical perspective of the enterprise and how the flow of goods and services is arranged. A wide set of strategies have evolved over time to provide guidelines for the decision makers but many of these strategies share a common foundation in process management that is based on decoupling points and decoupling zones. The strategies concerned here are segmentation, leagility, customization, postponement, servitization, sustainability, outsourcing, and visibility.

Keywords

Decoupling points segmentation leagility customization postponement servitization closed-loop outsourcing visibility 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Wikner, J.: On decoupling points and decoupling zones. Production & Manufacturing Research, 167–215 (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sharma, A., Lambert, D.M.: Segmentation of markets based on customer service. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 20(7), 19–27 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    van der Veeken, D.J.M., Rutten, W.G.M.M.: Logistics service management: Opportunities for differentiation. International Journal of Logistics Management 9(2), 91–98 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mason-Jones, R., Naylor, B., Towill, D.R.: Engineering the leagile supply chain. International Journal of Agile Management Systems 2(1), 54–61 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Naylor, B., Naim, J.M.M., Berry, D.: Leagility: Integrating the lean and agile manufacturing paradigms in the total supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics 62(1-2), 107–118 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lampel, J., Mintzberg, H.: Customizing Customization. Sloan Management Review 38(1), 21–30 (1996)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Davis, S.M.: Future perfect (1987)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hicks, C., McGovern, T., Earl, C.F.: Supply chain management: A strategic issue in engineer to order manufacturing. International Journal of Production Economics 65(2), 179–190 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Alderson, W.: Marketing Efficiency and the Principle of Postponement. Cost and Profit Outlook 4 (September 1950)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bucklin, L.P.: Postponement, speculation and the structure of distribution channels. Journal of Marketing Research 2(1), 26–31 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pagh, J.D., Cooper, M.C.: Supply chain postponement and speculation strategies: How to choose the right strategy. Journal of Business Logistics 19(2), 13–33 (1998)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wise, R., Baumgartner, P.: Go Downstream: The New Profit Imperative in Manufacturing. Harvard Business Review 77(5), 133–141 (1999)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vandermerwe, S., Rada, J.: Servitization of business: Adding value by adding services. European Management Journal 6(4), 314–324 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Thierry, M., et al.: Strategic issues in product recovery management. California Management Review 37(2) (1995)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Daniel, V., Guide Jr., R., Wassenhove, L.: Closed-loop Supply Chains. In: Klose, A., Speranza, M.G., Wassenhove, L. (eds.) Quantitative Approaches to Distribution Logistics and Supply Chain Management, pp. 47–60. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Linton, J.D., Klassen, R., Jayaraman, V.: Sustainable supply chains: An introduction. Journal of Operations Management 25(6), 1075–1082 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ford, H., Crowther, S.: Today and tomorrow, 281 p. Doubleday, Page & Company, Garden City, NY (1926)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Prahalad, C.K., Hamel, G.: The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review 68(3), 79–91 (1990)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bettis, R.A., Bradley, S.P., Hamel, G.: Outsourcing and Industrial Decline. The Executive 6(1), 7 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Forrester, J.W.: Industrial dynamics: a major breakthrough for decision makers. Harvard Business Review 36(4), 37–66 (1958)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lamming, R.C., Caldwell, N.D., Harrison, D.A., Phillips, W.: Transparency in supply relationships: Concept and practice. Journal of Supply Chain Management 37(4), 4–10 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hultman, J., Axelsson, B.: Towards a typology of transparency for marketing management research. Industrial Marketing Management 36(5), 627–635 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hoekstra, S., Romme, J. (eds.): Integral logistic structures: developing customer-oriented goods flow, xii, 164 p. Industrial Press, New York (1992)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hilletofth, P.: How to develop a differentiated supply chain strategy. Industrial Management & Data Systems 109(1), 16–33 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wikner, J., Rudberg, M.: Integrating production and engineering perspectives on the customer order decoupling point. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 25(7/8), 623–641 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rudberg, M., Wikner, J.: Mass customization in terms of the customer order decoupling point. Production Planning & Control 15(4), 445–458 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wikner, J., Bäckstrand, J.: Decoupling points and product uniqueness impact on supplier relations. In: 4th World Conference P&OM, Amsterdam (2012)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Towill, D.R.: Decoupling for supply chain competitiveness (material flow decoupling). Manufacturing Engineer 84(1), 36–39 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    García-Dastugue, S.J., Lambert, D.M.: Interorganizational time-based postponement in the supply chain. Journal of Business Logistics 28(1), 57–81 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wikner, J., Wong, H.: Postponement based on the positioning of the differentiation and decoupling points. In: Olhager, J., Persson, F. (eds.) APMS 2007. IFIP AICT, vol. 246, pp. 143–150. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Fließ, S., Kleinaltenkamp, M.: Blueprinting the service company: Managing service processes efficiently. Journal of Business Research 57(4), 392–404 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Moeller, S.: Customer Integration—A Key to an Implementation Perspective of Service Provision. Journal of Service Research 11(2), 197–210 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wikner, J.: A service decoupling point framework for logistics, manufacturing, and service operations. International Journal of Services Sciences 4(3), 330–357 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Blackburn, J.D., Daniel, V., Guide Jr., R., Souza, G.C., Van Wassenhove, L.N.: Reverse supply chains for commercial returns. California Management Review 46(2), 6–22 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wikner, J., Tang, O.: A structural framework for closed-loop supply chains. The International Journal of Logistics Management 19(3), 344–366 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mello, M.H., Semini, M., Haartveit, D.E.: A framework to integrate engineering, procurement, and production on the customer order decoupling point. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Working Seminar on Production Economics, Innsbruck, Austria, February 20-24 (2012)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wikner, J., Bäckstrand, J.: Aligning operations strategy and purchasing strategy. In: EurOMA Conference, Cambridge, UK (2011)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Mason-Jones, R., Towill, D.R.: Using the information decoupling point to improve supply chain performance. International Journal of Logistics Management 10(2), 13–26 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joakim Wikner
    • 1
  1. 1.Jönköping UniversitySweden

Personalised recommendations