Teaching Improvement Technologies for Adaptive and Personalized Learning Environments

  • Moushir M El-Bishouty
  • Kevin Saito
  • Tingwen Chang
  • Kinshuk
  • Sabine Graf
Part of the Lecture Notes in Educational Technology book series (LNET)


Due to the widespread of online learning, learning management systems (LMSs) contain many of online courses but very little attention is paid to how well these courses actually support learners. Teachers build courses according to their preferred teaching methods; on the other hand, learners have different learning styles. The harmony between the learning styles that a course supports and the actual learning styles of students can help to magnify the efficiency of the learning process. In this chapter, an interactive tool is presented for analyzing existing course contents in learning management systems based on learning styles. This tool allows teachers to be aware of the course support level for different learning styles. It visualizes the suitability of a course for students’ learning styles and helps teachers to improve the course support level of their courses. It aims at supporting teachers in adaptive and personalized learning environments to decide-making efficient modifications in the course structure in order to meet the need of different students’ learning styles.


Interactive course analyzer Learning styles Learning management systems 



The authors acknowledge the support of NSERC, iCORE, Xerox, and the research-related gift funding by Mr. A. Markin.


  1. Carver, C. A., Howard, R. A., & Lane, W. D. (1999). Addressing different learning styles through course hypermedia. IEEE Transactions on Education, 42(1), 33–38.Google Scholar
  2. Clay, J., & Orwig, C.J. (1999). Your learning style and language learning. Lingual links library, Summer Institute of Linguistic, Inc (SIL) International version 3.5.Google Scholar
  3. El-Bishouty, M.M., Chang, T.-W., Kinshuk, & Graf, S. (2012). A framework for analyzing course contents in learning management systems with respect to learning styles. In Biswas, G. et al. (eds.) 20th International Conference on Computers in Education (ICCE 2012) (pp. 91–95). Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education, Singapore.Google Scholar
  4. El-Bishouty, M.M., Saito, K., Chang, T.-W., Kinshuk, & Graf, S. (2013). An interactive course analyzer for improving learning styles support level. In Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Human-Computer Interaction and Knowledge Discovery in Complex, Unstructured, Big Data (HCI-KDD 2013), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, 7947 (pp. 136–147).Google Scholar
  5. Felder, R., & Silverman, L. (1988). Learning and teaching styles. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 674–681.Google Scholar
  6. Felder, R.M., & Soloman, B.A. (1997). Index of Learning Styles Questionnaire. North Carolina State University, Retrieved October, 2013, from
  7. Galusha, J. (1997). Barriers to learning in distance education. In Interpersonal Computing and Technology: An Electronic Journal for the 21st Century, (3/4), 6–14.Google Scholar
  8. Gaudioso, E., Montero, M., & Hernandez del Olmo, F. (2012). Supporting teachers in adaptive educational systems through predictive models: A proof of concept. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(1), 621–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Graf, S., & Kinshuk, (2007). Providing Adaptive Courses in Learning Management Systems with Re-spect to Learning Styles. In G. Richards (Ed.), The world conference on e-learning in corporate, government, healthcare, and higher education (e-learn) (pp. 2576–2583). Chesapeake, VA: AACE Press.Google Scholar
  10. Graf, S., Kinshuk, & Liu, T. C. (2009). Supporting teachers in identifying students’ learning styles in learning management systems: An automatic student modelling approach. Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 3–14.Google Scholar
  11. Hamada, M. (2007). Web-based tools for active learning in information theory. In Proceedings of the 38th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education (SIGCSE) 60–64.Google Scholar
  12. Helic, D., Maurer, H., & Scherbakov, N. (2000). Web-based training: what do we expect from the system. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Computers in Education, 1689–1694. Taiwan.Google Scholar
  13. Honey, P., & Mumford, A. (1982). The manual of learning styles. Maidenhead: Peter Honey.Google Scholar
  14. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  15. Kosba, E., Dimitrova, V., & Boyle, R. (2007). Adaptive feedback generation to support teachers in web-based distance education. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 17, 379–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kuljis, J., Liu, & F. (2005). A Comparison of Learning Style Theories on the Suitability for Elearning. In: Hamza, M.H. (ed.) The IASTED Conference on Web Technologies, Applications, and Services, 191–197. ACTA Press.Google Scholar
  17. Macfadyen, L. P., & Dawson, S. (2010). Mining LMS data to develop an early warning system for educators: A proof of concept. Computers & Education, 54, 588–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mejía, C., Baldiris, S., Gómez, S., & Fabregat, R.(2008). Adaptation process to deliver content based on user learning styles. International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation (ICERI 2008), IATED, Madrid (pp. 5091–5100).Google Scholar
  19. Onyejegbu, L. N., & Asor, V. E. (2011). An efficient model for detecting learning style preferences in a personalized e-learning management system. Cyber Journals: Multidisciplinary Journals in Science and Technology, Journal of Selected Areas in Software Engineering (JSSE), May Edition.Google Scholar
  20. Paredes, P., & Rodríguez, P. (2004). A mixed approach to modelling learning styles in adaptive educational hypermedia. Advanced Technology for Learning, 1(4), 210–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pask, G. (1976). Styles and strategies of learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 128–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Popescu, E. (2010). Adaptation provisioning with respect to learning styles in a web-based educational system: An experimental study. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 26, 243–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rivera, J., & Rice, M. (2002). A comparison of student outcomes and satisfaction between traditional and web-based course offerings. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 5(3),∼distance/ojdla/fall53/rivera53.html.
  24. Romero, C., & Ventura, S. (2007). Educational data mining: A survey from 1995 to 2005. Expert Systems with Applications, 32(1), 135–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Romero, C., & Ventura, S. (2010). Educational data mining: A review of the state of the art. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews, 40(6), 601–618.Google Scholar
  26. Romero, C., Ventura, S., Zafra, A., & de Bra, P. (2009). Applying web usage mining for personalizing hyperlinks in web-based adaptive educational systems. Computers & Education, 53, 828–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tsai, C. J., Tseng, S. S., & Lin, C. Y. (2001). A two-phase fuzzy mining and learning algorithm for adaptive learning environment. In Proceeding of the International Conference of Computational Science (ICCS), San Francisco (pp. 429–438).Google Scholar
  28. Tseng, J. C. R., Chu, H. C., Hwang, G. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2008). Development of an adaptive learning system with two sources of personalization information. Computers & Education, 51, 776–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Vialardi, C., Bravo, J., & Ortigosa, A. (2008). Improving AEH courses through log analysis. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 14(17), 1798–2777.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Moushir M El-Bishouty
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Kevin Saito
    • 1
    • 4
  • Tingwen Chang
    • 1
    • 3
  • Kinshuk
    • 1
    • 3
  • Sabine Graf
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.University DriveAthabasca UniversityEdmontonCanada
  2. 2.City for Scientific Research and Technological ApplicationsUniversities and Research Center DistrictAlexandriaEgypt
  3. 3.EdmontonCanada
  4. 4.CalgaryCanada

Personalised recommendations