Procedural Shape Modeling in Digital Humanities: Potentials and Issues

  • Sven Havemann
  • Olaf Wagener
  • Dieter Fellner
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8355)

Abstract

Procedural modeling is a technology that has great potential to make the abundant variety of shapes that have to be dealt with in Digital Humanities accessible and understandable. There is a gap, however, between technology on the one hand and the needs and requirements of the users in the Humanities community. In this paper we analyze the reasons for the limited uptake of procedural modeling and sketch possible ways to circumvent the problem. The key insight is that we have to find matching concepts in both fields, which are on the one hand grounded in the way shape is explained, e.g., in art history, but which can also be formalized to make them accessible to digital computers.

Keywords

Shape modeling 3D-reconstruction procedural modeling digital humanities shape understanding domain-specific languages 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    EPOCH project website, EU FP6 NoE 2004-2008, http://www.epoch-net.org
  2. 2.
    3D-COFORM project website, EU FP7 IP 2008-2012, http://3dcoform.eu/
  3. 3.
    Tzompanaki, K., Doerr, M., Theodoridou, M., Havemann, S.: 3D-COFORM: A Large-Scale Digital Production Environment. ERCIM News 86 (July 2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pitzalis, D., Kaminski, J., Niccolucci, F.: 3D-COFORM: Making 3D documentation an everyday choice for the cultural heritage sector. Virtual Archaeology Review 2(4), 145–146 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Crofts, N., Doerr, M., Stiff, M.: Definition of the CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model, ISO, iSO/PRF 21127 (2005), http://www.cidoc-crm.org/
  6. 6.
    Center for Information Modelling in the Humanities (ZIMiG), Graz University, http://gams.uni-graz.at/
  7. 7.
    Cologne Center for eHumanities, http://www.cceh.uni-koeln.de/projektliste
  8. 8.
    Stiny, G., Mitchell, W.J.: The Palladian grammar. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 5(1), 5–18 (1978), http://ideas.repec.org/a/pio/envirb/v5y1978i1p5-18.html, doi:10.1068/b050005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Koning, H., Eizenberg, J.: The language of the prairie: Frank Lloyd Wright’s prairie houses. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 8(3), 295–323 (1981), http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pio:envirb:v:8:y:1981:i:3:p:295-323, doi:10.1068/b080295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Downing, F., Flemming, U.: The bungalows of Buffalo. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 8(3), 269–293 (1981), http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pio:envirb:v:8:y:1981:i:3:p:269-293, doi:10.1068/b080269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Flemming, U.: More than the sum of parts: the grammar of Queen Anne houses. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 14(3), 323–350 (1987), http://ideas.repec.org/a/pio/envirb/v14y1987i3p323-350.html, doi:10.1068/b140323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Buelinckx, H.: Wren’s language of city church designs: a formal generative classification. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 20(6), 645–676 (1993), http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pio:envirb:v:20:y:1993:i:6:p:645-676, doi:10.1068/b200645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Duarte, J.P.: Customizing mass housing: a discursive grammar for Siza’s Malagueira houses. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Architecture (2002), http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/8189
  14. 14.
    Duarte, J.P.: Towards the mass customization of housing: the grammar of Siza’s houses at Malagueira. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 32(3), 347–380 (2005), http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pio:envirb:v:32:y:2005:i:3:p:347-380, doi:10.1068/b31124MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Duarte, J.P., Rocha, J.A.M., Soares, G.D.: Unveiling the structure of the Marrakech Medina: A shape grammar and an interpreter for generating urban form. Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf. 21(4), 317–349 (2007), http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0890060407000315, doi:10.1017/S0890060407000315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Müller, P., Vereenhoghe, T., Wonka, P., Paap, I., Van Gool, L.: Procedural 3D Reconstruction of Puuc buildings in Xkipche. In: Proc. VAST 2006, pp. 139–146. Eurographics Association, Aire-la-Ville (2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dylla, K., Müller, P., Ulmer, A., Haegler, S., Frischer, B.: Rome Reborn 2.0: A Case Study of Virtual City Reconstruction Using Procedural Modeling Techniques. In: Proc. CAA 2009, Williamsburg, Virginia, pp. 62–66. Archaeopress, Oxford (2010)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fassi, F., Parri, S.: Complex Architecture in 3D: From Survey to Web. International Journal of Heritage in the Digital Era (IJHDE) 1(3), 379–398 (2012), http://dx.doi.org/10.1260/2047-4970.1.3.379, doi:10.1260/2047-4970.1.3.379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    De Luca, L., Veron, P., Florenzano, M.: A generic formalism for the semantic modeling and representation of architectural elements. The Visual Computer 23(3), 181–205 (2007), doi:10.1007/s00371-006-0092-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Havemann, S.: Generative Mesh Modeling. PhD thesis, Braunschweig University of Technology (2005)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Havemann, S., Fellner, D.W.: Generative parametric design of gothic window tracery. In: Proc. VAST 2004, pp. 193–201 (2004), doi:10.2312/VAST/VAST04/193-201Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gerth, B., Berndt, R., Havemann, S., Fellner, D.W.: 3D modeling for nonexpert users with the Castle Construction Kit v0.5. In: Proc. VAST 2005 Intl. Symp., pp. 49–57. Eurographics (2005), doi:10.2312/VAST/VAST05/049-057Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hohmann, B., Havemann, S., Krispel, U., Fellner, D.W.: A GML shape grammar for semantically enriched 3D building models. Computers & Graphics 34(4), 322–334 (2010), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2010.05.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zmugg, R., Krispel, U., Thaller, W., Havemann, S., Pszeida, M., Fellner, D.W.: A new approach for interactive procedural modelling in cultural heritage. In: Proceedings of the 40th Conference of Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (CAA 2012) (2012)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Havemann, S., Fellner, D.W.: Towards a New Shape Description Paradigm Using the Generative Modeling Language. In: Calude, C.S., Rozenberg, G., Salomaa, A. (eds.) Rainbow of Computer Science. LNCS, vol. 6570, pp. 200–214. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Thaller, W., Zmugg, R., Krispel, U., Posch, M., Havemann, S., Pszeida, M., Fellner, D.W.: Creating procedural window building blocks using the generative fact labeling method. In: Boehm, J., Kersten, T., Fuse, T., Remondino, F. (eds.) Proceedings of the 5th ISPRS International Workshop 3D-ARCH 2013, ISPRS (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sven Havemann
    • 1
  • Olaf Wagener
    • 3
  • Dieter Fellner
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Computer Graphics and Knowledge VisualizationGraz University of TechnologyAustria
  2. 2.Fraunhofer IGD and TU DarmstadtGermany
  3. 3.Institut für Europäische KunstgeschichteUniversity of HeidelbergGermany

Personalised recommendations