Innovation and Creativity in Project Teams

  • Günter W. MaierEmail author
  • Ute R. Hülsheger
  • Neil Anderson
Part of the Management for Professionals book series (MANAGPROF)


In present-day organizations, new products and services are almost invariably not invented or developed by one individual, but by project teams. Research into innovation in project team has flourished, and we now know a lot about which factors affect innovative behavior, innovative processes, and innovative outcomes in project teams.


Team Member Innovation Process Project Team Transformational Leadership Leadership Style 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 123–167.Google Scholar
  2. Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, N., & King, N. (1993). Innovation in organizations. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 1–34). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, N., & West, M. (1996). The team climate inventory: Development of the TCI and its applications in teambuilding for innovativeness. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5, 53–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson, N. R., & West, M. A. (1998). Measuring climate for work group innovation: Development and validation of the team climate inventory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 235–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anderson, N., West, M., & Bradley, H. (1997). Team climate inventory: Team facilitator’s handbook. Windsor: Nfer-Nelson.Google Scholar
  7. Beal, D. J., Cohen, R. R., Burke, M. J., & McLendon, C. L. (2003). Cohesion and performance in groups: A meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 989–1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bledow, R., Frese, M., Anderson, N., Erez, M., & Farr, J. (2009). Extending and refining the dialectic perspective on innovation: There is nothing as practical as a good theory; nothing as theoretical as a good practice. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 2, 363–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Caird, S. (1994). How do award winners come up with innovative ideas? Creativity and Innovation Management, 3, 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dougherty, D. (1992). Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organization Science, 3, 179–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Edmondson, A. C. (1996). Learning from mistakes is easier said than done: Group and organizational influences on the detection and correction of human error. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 32, 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Elsbach, K. D., & Kramer, R. M. (2003). Assessing creativity in Hollywood pitch meetings: Evidence for a dual-process model of creativity judgments. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 283–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Homans, G. C. (1950). The human group. New York: Hartcourt.Google Scholar
  14. Hülsheger, U. R., Anderson, N. R., & Salgado, J. F. (2009). Team-level predictors of innovation at work: A comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1128–1145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kanter, R. M. (1988). When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 169–211.Google Scholar
  16. Kasof, J. (1995). Social determinants of creativity: Status expectations and the evaluation of original products. Advances in Group Processes, 12, 167–220.Google Scholar
  17. Keller, R. T. (1992). Transformational leadership and the performance of research and development project groups. Journal of Management, 18, 489–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lovelace, K., Shapiro, D. L., & Weingart, L. R. (2001). Maximizing cross-functional new product teams’ innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communications perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 779–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Maier, G. W., Streicher, B., Jonas, E., & Frey, D. (2007). Kreativität und Innovation [Creativity and innovation]. In D. Frey & L. von Rosenstiel (Eds.), Enzyklopädie der Psychologie: Wirtschaftspsychologie (pp. 809–855). Stuttgart: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  20. Monge, P., Cozzens, M., & Contractor, N. (1992). Communication and motivational predictors of the dynamics of organizational innovation. Organization Science, 3, 250–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mumford, M. D. (2012). Handbook of organizational creativity. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  22. Redmond, M. R., Mumford, M. D., & Teach, R. (1993). Putting creativity to work: Effects of leader behavior on subordinate creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55, 120–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rosing, K., Frese, M., & Bausch, A. (2011). Explaining the heterogeneity of the leadership-innovation relationship: Ambidextrous leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 22, 956–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Saavedra, R., Earley, P. C., & van Dyne, L. (1993). Complex interdependence in task-performing groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 580–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shalley, C. E., & Gilson, L. L. (2004). What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity. Leadership Quarterly, 15, 33–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Staw, B. M., & Boettger, R. D. (1990). Task revision: A neglected form of work performance. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 534–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. van der Vegt, G., & van de Vliert, E. (2002). Intragroup interdependence and effectiveness: Review and proposed directions for theory and practice. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 17, 50–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Waldman, D. A., & Bass, B. M. (1991). Transformational leadership at different phases of the innovation process. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 2, 169–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ward, T. B., Smith, S. M., & Finke, R. A. (1999). Creative cognition. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 189–212). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Weisberg, R. W. (1993). Creativity: Beyond the myth of creativity. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
  32. West, M. A. (1990). The social psychology of innovation in groups. In M. A. West & J. L. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work (pp. 309–333). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  33. West, M. A., & Farr, J. L. (1990). Innovation at work. In M. A. West & J. L. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies (pp. 3–13). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  34. Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 682–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Günter W. Maier
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ute R. Hülsheger
    • 2
  • Neil Anderson
    • 3
  1. 1.Work and Organizational PsychologyBielefeld UniversityBielefeldGermany
  2. 2.Department of Work and Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and NeuroscienceMaastricht UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Brunel University LondonUxbridgeUK

Personalised recommendations