Adaptation to Motion Presented with a Tactile Array

  • Sarah McIntyre
  • Tatjana Seizova-Cajic
  • Ingvars Birznieks
  • Alex O. Holcombe
  • Richard M. Vickery
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8618)

Abstract

We investigated the effects of adaptation to 2 min of tactile apparent motion along the proximo-distal axis of the finger pad, produced with a vibrotactile array (Optacon), and developed a novel method to reveal the tactile motion aftereffect. Participants continuously reported perceived direction during adaptation to motion in the distal or proximal direction. The clarity of the direction percept weakened over time. Following this adaptation phase, participants judged the direction of a dynamic test stimulus composed of simultaneous motion in both directions. A tactile motion aftereffect (tMAE) resulted - the test stimulus was felt to move in the direction opposite to the adapting motion. The tMAE was robust to changes in the stimulus including speed and spatial features of the moving pattern, but there was a general bias to perceive distal motion. The implication for tactile devices is that motion signals should be brief and varied to avoid adaptation artifacts.

Keywords

Tactile Adaptation Motion Psychophysics Vibrotactile 

References

  1. 1.
    McIntyre, S., Holcombe, A.O., Birznieks, I., Seizova-Cajic, T.: Tactile motion adaptation reduces perceived speed but shows no evidence of direction sensitivity. PLoS ONE 7, e45438 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    von Rausch, E.: Über kinaesthetische nachwirkungen. Psychol. Beiträge. 5, 232–320 (1960)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Watanabe, J., Hayashi, S., Kajimoto, H., Tachi, S., Nishida, S.: Tactile motion aftereffects produced by appropriate presentation for mechanoreceptors. Exp. Brain Res. 180, 577–582 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wohlgemuth, A.: On the aftereffect of seen movement. Br. J. Psychol. (Monograph Suppl.) 1, 1–117 (1911)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hazlewood, V.: A note on failure to find a tactile motion aftereffect. Aust. J. Psychol. 23, 59–62 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lerner, E.A., Craig, J.C.: The prevalence of tactile motion aftereffects. Somatosens. Mot. Res. 19, 24–29 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Planetta, P.J., Servos, P.: The tactile motion aftereffect revisited. Somatosens. Mot. Res. 25, 93–99 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Thalman, W.: The after-effect of movement in the sense of touch. Am. J. Psychol. 33, 268–276 (1922)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bliss, J.: Optical-to-tactile image conversion aids for the blind. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 48, 352–353 (1967)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gardner, E.P., Sklar, B.F.: Discrimination of the direction of motion on the human hand: a psychophysical study of stimulation parameters. J. Neurophysiol. 71, 2414–2429 (1994)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Essick, G.K., Rath, E.M., Kelly, D.G., James, A., Murray, R.A., Bolanowski, S.J.: A novel approach for studying direction discrimiuation. In: Franzén, O., Johansson, R.S., Terenius, L. (eds.) Somesthesis and the Neurobiology of the Somatosensory Cortex, pp. 59–72. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel/Switzerland (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Konkle, T., Wang, Q., Hayward, V., Moore, C.I.: Motion aftereffects transfer between touch and vision. Curr. Biol. 19(9), 745–750 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.cub.2009.03.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sarah McIntyre
    • 1
    • 2
  • Tatjana Seizova-Cajic
    • 3
  • Ingvars Birznieks
    • 1
    • 4
  • Alex O. Holcombe
    • 2
  • Richard M. Vickery
    • 5
  1. 1.Neuroscience Research AustraliaSydneyAustralia
  2. 2.School of PsychologyUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia
  3. 3.Faculty of Health SciencesUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia
  4. 4.School of Science and HealthUniversity of Western SydneySydneyAustralia
  5. 5.School of Medical SciencesUNSW AustraliaSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations