Vibrotactile Stimuli for Distinction of Virtual Constraints and Environment Feedback

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8618)

Abstract

In virtual reality and teleoperation scenarios, active constraints can be used to guide a user, prevent him from entering forbidden regions, and assist him in general. On a haptic interface, this implies superimposing the forces generated by the active constraints on top of the forces that are generated by the environment (real or virtual). This creates the problem of distinguishing from which of these two sources does a stimuli come from while perceiving feedback.

In this paper, we present an approach that consists in adding a vibrating component on top of the forces generated by the virtual constraints, while the forces generated by the environment are kept untouched. Blind experiments in which users have to navigate through a scenario containing both active constraints and randomly positioned objects show that they manage to perceive more successfully the presence of the unexpected objects with our approach than with previously existing ones. Moreover, the penetration into the constraints is as good as with the classical approach.

References

  1. 1.
    Morris, D., Tan, H., Barbagli, F., Chang, T., Salisbury, K.: Haptic feedback enhances force skill learning. In: Second Joint EuroHaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems (WHC’07), pp. 21–26 (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ström, P., Hedman, L., Särnå, L., Kjellin, A., Wredmark, T., Felländer-Tsai, L.: Early exposure to haptic feedback enhances performance in surgical simulator training: a prospective randomized crossover study in surgical residents. Surg. Endosc. 20, 1383–1388 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hokayem, P.F., Spong, M.W.: Bilateral teleoperation: an historical survey. Automatica 42, 2035–2057 (2006)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Maddahi, Y., Zareinia, K., Olson, T., Mueller, W., Sepehri, N.: Live-line maintenance training using robotics technology. In: 2013 World Haptics Conference (WHC), pp. 587–592 (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Garcia-Hernandez, N., Parra-Vega, V.: Haptic teleoperated robotic system for an effective obstacle avoidance. In: 2009 Second International Conferences on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions, pp. 255–260. IEEE (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ren, J., Patel, R.V., McIsaac, K.A., Guiraudon, G., Peters, T.M.: Dynamic 3-D virtual fixtures for minimally invasive beating heart procedures. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 27, 1061–1070 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Park, J.W., Choi, J., Park, Y., Sun, K.: Haptic virtual fixture for robotic cardiac catheter navigation. Artif. Organs 35, 1127–1131 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nakao, M., Imanishi, K., Kuroda, T., Oyama, H.: Practical haptic navigation with clickable 3D region input interface for supporting master-slave type robotic surgery. Stud. Health Technol. Informatics 98, 265–271 (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jeon, S., Choi, S., Harders, M.: Rendering virtual tumors in real tissue mock-ups using haptic augmented reality. IEEE Trans. Haptics 5, 77–84 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Abbott, J., Hager, G., Okamura, A.: Steady-hand teleoperation with virtual fixtures. In: Proceedings of the 12th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, ROMAN 2003, pp. 145–151. IEEE (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Uneri, A., Balicki, M.A., Handa, J., Gehlbach, P., Taylor, R.H., Iordachita, I.: New steady-hand eye robot with micro-force sensing for vitreoretinal surgery. In: IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, pp. 814–819. (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ramos, A., Pacchierotti, C., Prattichizzo, D.: Vibrotactile stimuli for augmented haptic feedback in robot-assisted surgery. In: 2013 World Haptics Conference (WHC), pp. 473–478. IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bell, J., Bolanowski, S., Holmes, M.H.: The Structure and function of pacinian corpuscles: a review. Prog. Neurobiol. 42, 79–128 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cholewiak, R., Collins, A.: Sensory and physiological bases of touch (1991)Google Scholar
  15. 15.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Advanced RoboticsIstituto Italiano di TecnologiaGenovaItaly
  2. 2.Department of Information Engineering and MathematicsUniversity of SienaSienaItaly

Personalised recommendations