Advertisement

An Analysis of the Influence of a Pseudo-haptic Cue on the Haptic Perception of Weight

  • Karljohan Lundin Palmerius
  • Daniel Johansson
  • Gunnar Höst
  • Konrad Schönborn
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8618)

Abstract

Haptics provides powerful cues about forces but cannot easily be integrated in all relevant applications, such as education. Pseudo-haptic cues, visual information that simulate haptic sensations, have been raised as an alternative. It is, however, largely unknown how (or even if) pseudo-haptic cues are perceived by the haptic sensory modality. In this paper we present an approach that applies theories on multimodal integration to testing if a pseudo-haptic cue is triggering haptic perception. This approach is subsequently applied in designing an experiment that tests a pseudo-haptic cue based on a visual force-causes-displacement metaphor, similar to a rubber band.

Keywords

Pseudo-haptics Perception Cross-modal effects Multimodal integration 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the Swedish Research Council (VR) grant 2011–37694-88055-31. We thank Dr. Camilla Forsell for advice on the design of the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Biocca, F., Kim, J., Choi, Y.: Visual touch in virtual environments: an exploratory study of presence, multimodal interfaces, and cross-modal sensory illusions. Presence 10(3), 247–265 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ernst, M.O.: A Bayesian View on Multimodal Cue Integration, Chap. 6, pp. 105–131. Oxford University Press (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lécuyer, A.: Simulating haptic feedback using vision: a survey of research and applications of pseudo-haptic feedback. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environ. 18(1), 39–53 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lécuyer, A., Coquillart, S., Coiffet, P.: Simulating haptic information with haptic illusions in virtual environments. In: Proceedings of the NATO RTA/Human Factors and Medicine Panel Workshop (2000)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Leek, M.R.: Adaptive procedures in psychophysical research. Percept. Psychophysics 63(8), 1279–1292 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Levitt, H.: Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 49(2), 467–477 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Paljic, A., Burkhardt, J.M., Coquillart, S.: Evaluation of pseudo-haptic feedback for simulating torque: a comparison between isometric and elastic input devices. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pusch, A., Martin, O., Coquillart, S.: Hemp – hand-displacement-based pseudo-haptics: A study of a force field application. In: Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Richard, E., Tijou, A., Richard, P., Ferrier, J.L.: Multi-modal virtual environments for education with haptic and olfactory feedback. Virtual Reality 10(3–4), 207–225 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rodgers, M.E., Mandryk, R.L., Inkpen, K.M.: Smart sticky widgets: pseudo-haptic enhancements for multi-monitor displays. In: Butz, A., Fisher, B., Krüger, A., Olivier, P. (eds.) SG 2006. LNCS, vol. 4073, pp. 194–205. Springer, Heidelberg (2006) CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karljohan Lundin Palmerius
    • 1
  • Daniel Johansson
    • 1
  • Gunnar Höst
    • 1
  • Konrad Schönborn
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Science and TechnologyLinköping UniversityLinköpingSweden

Personalised recommendations