Models of Adjunction in Minimalist Grammars
Three closely related proposals for adding (cyclic) adjunction to Minimalist grammars are given model-theoretic definitions and investigated with respect to their linguistic and formal properties. While they differ with respect to their linguistic adequacy, they behave largely the same on a computational level. Weak generative capacity is not affected, and while subregular complexity varies betweeen the three proposals, it does not exceed the complexity imposed by Move. The closure of Minimalist derivation tree languages under intersection with regular tree languages, however, is lost.
KeywordsMinimalist grammars adjunction derivation trees subregular tree languages closure properties
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Collins, C.: Argument sharing in serial verb constructions. Linguistic Inquiry 28, 461–497 (1997)Google Scholar
- 2.Fowlie, M.: Order and optionality: Minimalist grammars with adjunction. In: Kornai, A., Kuhlmann, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 13th Meeting on the Mathematics of Language (MoL 2013), pp. 12–20 (2013)Google Scholar
- 3.Frey, W., Gärtner, H.M.: On the treatment of scrambling and adjunction in minimalist grammars. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Formal Grammar (FGTrento), Trento, pp. 41–52 (2002)Google Scholar
- 6.Graf, T.: Local and Transderivational Constraints in Syntax and Semantics. Ph.D. thesis, UCLA (2013)Google Scholar
- 7.Graf, T.: The syntactic algebra of adjuncts. In: Proceedings of CLS49 (to appear)Google Scholar
- 11.Mönnich, U.: Grammar morphisms, ms. University of Tübingen (2006)Google Scholar