Advertisement

Enhancing Feasibility of Human-Driven Processes by Transforming Process Models to Process Checklists

  • Michaela Baumann
  • Michael Heinrich Baumann
  • Stefan Schönig
  • Stefan Jablonski
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 175)

Abstract

In traditional approaches business processes are executed on top of IT-based Workflow-Management Systems (WfMS). The key benefits of the application of a WfMS are task coordination, step-by-step guidance through process execution and traceability supporting compliance issues. However, when dealing with human-driven workflows, conventional WfMS turn out to be too restrictive. Especially, the only way to handle exceptions is to bypass the system. If users are forced to bypass WfMS frequently, the system is more a liability than an asset. In order to diminish the dependency from IT-based process management systems, we propose an alternative way of supporting workflow execution that is especially suitable for human-driven processes. We introduce the so-called process checklist representation of process models where processes are described as a paper-based step-by-step instruction handbook.

Keywords

process modelling process checklists paper-based process execution 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Jablonski, S.: Do We Really Know How to Support Processes? Considerations and Reconstruction. In: Engels, G., Lewerentz, C., Schäfer, W., Schürr, A., Westfechtel, B. (eds.) Nagl Festschrift. LNCS, vol. 5765, pp. 393–410. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zairi, M.: Business Process Management: a Boundaryless Approach to Modern Competitiveness. Business Process Management Journal 3, 64–80 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Reichert, M., Weber, B.: Enabling Flexibility in Process-aware Information Systems. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Van der Aalst, W., Weske, M., Grünbauer, D.: Case handling: A new paradigm for business process support. Data & Knowledge Engineering 53(2), 129–162 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Condon, C.: The Computer Won’t Let Me: Cooperation, Conflict and the Ownership of Information. In: CSCW, pp. 171-185 (1993)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Luff, P., Heath, C., Greatbatch, D.: Tasks-in-interaction: paper and screen based documentation in collaborative activity. In: CSCW (1992)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Melenovsky, M.: Business process managements success hinges on business-led initiatives, Gartner Research, Stamford, CT, pp. 1-6 (July 2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Object Management Group Inc.: Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) Version 2.0 (2011), http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0
  9. 9.
    Wolff, A., Taylor, S., McCabe, J.: Using checklists and reminders in clinical pathways to improve hospital inpatient care. MJA 2004 181, 428–431 (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hales, B.M., Pronovost, P.J.: The checklist – A tool for error management and performance improvement. Journal of Critical Care 21(3), 213–235 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hauser, R., Friess, M., Küster, J.M., Vanhatalo, J.: Combining Analysis of Unstructured Workflows with Transformation of Structured Workflows. In: Proc. 10th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference, EDOC (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Koehler, J., Hauser, R., Küster, J., Ryndina, K., Vanhatalo, J., Wahler, M.: The Role of Visual Modeling and Model Transformation in Business-driven Development. In: Proc. 5th International Workshop on Graph Transformation and Visual Modeling Techniques (GT-VMT 2006), Vienna, Austria (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    zur Muehlen, M., Recker, J.: How Much Language Is Enough? Theoretical and Practical Use of the Business Process Modeling Notation. In: Bellahsène, Z., Léonard, M. (eds.) CAiSE 2008. LNCS, vol. 5074, pp. 465–479. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pešić, M.: Constraint-Based Workflow Management Systems, Shifting Control to Users (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michaela Baumann
    • 1
  • Michael Heinrich Baumann
    • 1
  • Stefan Schönig
    • 1
  • Stefan Jablonski
    • 1
  1. 1.University of BayreuthGermany

Personalised recommendations