Abstract
Almost all mammal penises have a foreskin, which in humans first appears at 8 weeks gestation as a ridge of thickened epithelium; the prepuce grows forward over the developing glans, and it is complete by 16 weeks gestation. In contrast to the glans, which is innervated principally by free nerve endings mediating poorly localized sensations, the prepuce has a rich somatosensory innervation forming an important component of the normal complement of penile erogenous tissue.
Aposthia is a rare congenital condition in humans in which the foreskin of the penis is missing in a normally developed penis and urethra; it is a very rare congenital anomaly; however, in the last few years, various cases had been reported. It is suggested that the extensive study on aposthia may be helpful for properly understanding the importance of circumcision and reducing the controversy in medical sciences. Microposthia is a condition of having a very small foreskin; it is diagnosed if the glans penis could be seen partially in a flaccid penis.
Congenital megaprepuce is a rare condition that has only recently received recognition as an entity in its own right, and it is possible that it represents a genuinely new pathology.
Some boys may present with one or more yellowish lumps on the penis that are often diagnosed by the general practitioner as sebaceous cysts or lipoma of the penile shaft, but it is proved to be collections of retained smegma trapped by surrounding preputial adhesions which are called smegmoma. Balanitis Xerotica Obliterans is a chronic and atrophic mucocutaneous condition affecting epidermis and dermal connective tissue that most commonly involves the genital and perianal skin of both males and females.
Keywords
Penile Cancer Mometasone Furoate Clobetasol Propionate Free Nerve Ending Glans PenisReferences
Prepuce
- 1.Radojicic ZI, Perovic SV. Classification of prepuce in hypospadias according to morphological abnormalities and their impact in hypospadias repair. J Urol. 2004;172(1):301–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aposthia
- 2.Sadeghipour Roudsari S, Esmailzadehha N. Aposthia: a case report. J Pediatr Surg. 2010;45(8):17–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Amin Ud Din M, Salam A, Rafiq MA, Khaliq I, Ansar M, Ahmad W. Aposthia: a birth defect or normal quantitative recessive human genetic trait? East Mediterr Health J. 2007;13(2):280–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 4.Talbot ES. Inheritance of circumcision effects. Medicine. 1898;4:473–5.Google Scholar
Congenital Megaprepuce (CM)
- 5.O’Brien A, Shapiro AMJ, Frank JD. Phimosis or congenital megaprepuce. Br J Urol. 1994;73:719–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Summerton DJ, McNally J, Denny AJ, Malone PS. Congenital megaprepuce: an emerging condition – how to recognize and treat it. BJU Int. 2000;86(4):519–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preputial Cysts and Smegmoma
- 7.Parkash S, Rao R, Venkatesan K, et al. Sub-preputial wetness – its nature. Ann Nat Med Sci. 1982;18:109–12.Google Scholar
- 8.Cold CJ, Taylor JR. The prepuce. Br J Urol. 1999;83(1):34–44.Google Scholar
Balanitis Xerotica Obliterans (BXO)
- 9.Thomas RM, Ridley CM, Black MM. The association of lichen sclerosus et atrophicus related disease in males. Br J Dermatol. 1983;109:661–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Kumaran MS, Kanwar AJ. Squamous cell carcinoma in untreated lichen sclerosus of the penis: a rare complication. J Dermatol. 2004;31:239–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar