Tuning the Alt-Ergo SMT Solver for B Proof Obligations

  • Sylvain Conchon
  • Mohamed Iguernelala
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8477)

Abstract

In this paper, we present recent developments in the Alt-Ergo SMT-solver to efficiently discharge proof obligations (POs) generated by Atelier B. This includes a new plugin architecture to facilitate experiments with different SAT engines, new heuristics to handle quantified formulas, and important modifications in its internal data structures to boost performances of core decision procedures. Experiments realized on more than 10,000 POs generated from industrial B projects show significant improvements.

Keywords

SMT solvers B Proof Obligations B Method 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Burel, G.: Experimenting with Deduction Modulo. In: Bjørner, N., Sofronie-Stokkermans, V. (eds.) CADE 2011. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6803, pp. 162–176. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Conchon, S., Contejean, E., Iguernelala, M.: Canonized Rewriting and Ground AC Completion Modulo Shostak Theories: Design and Implementation. Logical Methods in Computer Science 8(3) (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Conchon, S., Contejean, E., Kanig, J., Lescuyer, S.: CC(X): Semantic Combination of Congruence Closure with Solvable Theories. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 198(2), 51–69 (2008)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Delahaye, D., Doligez, D., Gilbert, F., Halmagrand, P., Hermant, O.: Proof Certification in Zenon Modulo: When Achilles Uses Deduction Modulo to Outrun the Tortoise with Shorter Steps. In: International Workshop on the Implementation of Logics (IWIL), Stellenbosch (South Africa). EasyChair (December 2013) (to appear)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Delahaye, D., Doligez, D., Gilbert, F., Halmagrand, P., Hermant, O.: Zenon Modulo: When Achilles Outruns the Tortoise Using Deduction Modulo. In: McMillan, K., Middeldorp, A., Voronkov, A. (eds.) LPAR-19. LNCS, vol. 8312, pp. 274–290. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Filliâtre, J.-C., Paskevich, A.: Why3 — Where Programs Meet Provers. In: Felleisen, M., Gardner, P. (eds.) ESOP 2013. LNCS, vol. 7792, pp. 125–128. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mentré, D., Marché, C., Filliâtre, J.-C., Asuka, M.: Discharging Proof Obligations from Atelier B Using Multiple Automated Provers. In: Derrick, J., Fitzgerald, J., Gnesi, S., Khurshid, S., Leuschel, M., Reeves, S., Riccobene, E. (eds.) ABZ 2012. LNCS, vol. 7316, pp. 238–251. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    The Bware Project (2012), http://bware.lri.fr/

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sylvain Conchon
    • 1
    • 2
  • Mohamed Iguernelala
    • 3
    • 1
  1. 1.LRIUniversité Paris-SudOrsayFrance
  2. 2.INRIA Saclay – Ile-de-France, ToccataOrsayFrance
  3. 3.OCamlPro SASGif-sur-YvetteFrance

Personalised recommendations