Phylogenetic Prediction to Identify “Evolutionary Singularities”

Chapter

Abstract

Understanding adaptive patterns is especially difficult in the case of “evolutionary singularities,” i.e., traits that evolved in only one lineage in the clade of interest. New methods are needed to integrate our understanding of general phenotypic correlations and convergence within a clade when examining a single lineage in that clade. Here, we develop and apply a new method to investigate change along a single branch of an evolutionary tree; this method can be applied to any branch on a phylogeny, typically focusing on an a priori hypothesis for “exceptional evolution” along particular branches, for example in humans relative to other primates. Specifically, we use phylogenetic methods to predict trait values for a tip on the phylogeny based on a statistical (regression) model, phylogenetic signal (λ), and evolutionary relationships among species in the clade. We can then evaluate whether the observed value departs from the predicted value. We provide two worked examples in human evolution using original R scripts that implement this concept in a Bayesian framework. We also provide simulations that investigate the statistical validity of the approach. While multiple approaches can and should be used to investigate singularities in an evolutionary context—including studies of the rate of phenotypic change along a branch—our Bayesian approach provides a way to place confidence on the predicted values in light of uncertainty about the underlying evolutionary and statistical parameters.

References

  1. Allman JM, Martin B (2000) Evolving brains. Scientific American Library, Nueva YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnold C, Matthews LJ, Nunn CL (2010) The 10kTrees website: a new online resource for primate phylogeny. Evol Anthropol 19:114–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barrett R, Kuzawa CW, McDade T, Armelagos GJ (1998) Emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases: the third epidemiologic transition. Annu Rev Anthropol 27:247–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barton RA (1996) Neocortex size and behavioural ecology in primates. Proc R Soc Lond (Biol) 263:173–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barton RA, Venditti C (2013) Human frontal lobes are not relatively large. PNAS 110:9001–9006PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cooper N, Kamilar JM, Nunn CL (2012) Longevity and parasite species richness in mammals. PLoS OneGoogle Scholar
  7. Deaner RO, Isler K, Burkart J, van Schaik C (2007) Overall brain size, and not encephalization quotient, best predicts cognitive ability across non-human primates. Brain Behav Evol 70:115–124PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deaner RO, Nunn CL, van Schaik CP (2000) Comparative tests of primate cognition: different scaling methods produce different results. Brain Behav Evol 55:44–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Diniz-Filho JAF, De Sant’ana CER, Bini LM (1998) An eigenvector method for estimating phylogenetic inertia. Evolution 52:1247–1262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Diniz-Filho JAF, Bini LM (2005) Modelling geographical patterns in species richness using eigenvector-based spatial filters. Global Ecol Biogeogr 14:177–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dunbar RIM (1993) Coevolution of neocortical size, group size and language in humans. Behav Brain Sci 16:681–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fagan WF, Pearson YE, Larsen EA, Lynch HJ, Turner JB, Staver H, Noble AE, Bewick S, Goldberg EE (2013) Phylogenetic prediction of the maximum per capita rate of population growth. Proc R Soc Lond (Biol) 280:20130523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Felsenstein J (1985) Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am Nat 125:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Freckleton RP, Harvey PH, Pagel M (2002) Phylogenetic analysis and comparative data: a test and review of evidence. Am Nat 160:712–726PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Garland T, Bennett AF, Rezende EL (2005) Phylogenetic approaches in comparative physiology. J Exp Biol 208:3015–3035PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Garland T, Dickerman AW, Janis CM, Jones JA (1993) Phylogenetic analysis of covariance by computer simulation. Syst Biol 42:265–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Garland T, Ives AR (2000) Using the past to predict the present: confidence intervals for regression equations in phylogenetic comparative methods. Am Nat 155:346–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Garland T, Midford PE, Ives AR (1999) An introduction to phylogenetically based statistical methods, with a new method for confidence intervals on ancestral values. Am Zool 39:374–388Google Scholar
  19. Gelman A (2004) Bayesian Data Analysis. Chapman & Hall/CRC, London/Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  20. Grafen A (1989) The phylogenetic regression. Philos Trans R Soc Lond (Biol) 326:119–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harvey PH, Pagel MD (1991) The comparative method in evolutionary biology., Oxford Series in Ecology and EvolutionOxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  22. Hastings WK (1970) Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov Chains and their applications. Biometrika 57(1):97–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hughes AL, Hughes MK (1995) Small genomes for better flyers. Nature 377:391. doi:10.1038/377391a0 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jungers WL (1978) Functional significance of skeletal allometry in megaladapis in comparison to living prosimians. Am J Phys Anthropol 49:303–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kappeler PM, Silk JB (eds) (2009) Mind the gap: tracing the origins of human universals. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  26. Lieberman D (2011) The evolution of the human head. Belknap Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  27. Liu J (2003) Monte Carlo strategies in scientific computing. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  28. Maddison WP, Midford PE, Otto SP (2007) Estimating a binary character’s effect on speciation and extinction. Syst Biol 56:701–710PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Martin R (2002) Primatology as an essential basis for biological anthropology. Evol Anthropol 11:3–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Martin RD (1990) Primate origins and evolution. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  31. Martins EP (1994) Estimating the rate of phenotypic evolution from comparative data. Am Nat 144:193–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Martins EP, Hansen TF (1997) Phylogenies and the comparative method: a general approach to incorporating phylogenetic information into the analysis of interspecific data. Am Nat 149:646–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McPeek MA (1995) Testing hypotheses about evolutionary change on single branches of a phylogeny using evolutionary contrasts. Am Nat 145:686–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mundry R, Nunn CL (2009) Stepwise model fitting and statistical inference: turning noise into signal pollution. Am Nat 173:119–123PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Napier JR (1970) The roots of mankind. Smithsonian Institution Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  36. Napier JR, Walker AC (1967) Vertical clinging and leaping—a newly recognized category of locomotor behaviour of primates. Folia Primatol 6:204–219PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nee S (2006) Birth-death models in macroevolution. Ann Rev Ecol Evol S 37:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nunn CL (2002) A comparative study of leukocyte counts and disease risk in primates. Evolution 56:177–190PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nunn CL (2011) The comparative approach in evolutionary anthropology and biology. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nunn CL, Gittleman JL, Antonovics J (2000) Promiscuity and the primate immune system. Science 290:1168–1170PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nunn CL, Lindenfors P, Pursall ER, Rolff J (2009) On sexual dimorphism in immune function. Philos Trans Roy Soc B Biol Sci 364:61–69. doi:10.1098/Rstb.2008.0148 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nunn CL, van Schaik CP (2002) Reconstructing the behavioral ecology of extinct primates. In: Plavcan JM, Kay RF, Jungers WL, Schaik CPv (eds) Reconstructing behavior in the fossil record. Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York, pp 159–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. O’Hara RB, Sillanpaay MJ (2009) A review of bayesian variable selection methods: what, how and which. Bayesian Anal 4(1):85–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. O’Meara BC, Ane C, Sanderson MJ, Wainwright PC (2006) Testing for different rates of continuous trait evolution using likelihood. Evolution 60:922–933PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Organ CL, Nunn CL, Machanda Z, Wrangham RW (2011) Phylogenetic rate shifts in feeding time during the evolution of Homo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:14555–14559PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Organ CL, Shedlock AM (2009) Palaeogenomics of pterosaurs and the evolution of small genome size in flying vertebrates. Biol Lett 5:47–50PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Organ CL, Shedlock AM, Meade A, Pagel M, Edwards SV (2007) Origin of avian genome size and structure in non-avian dinosaurs. Nature 446:180–184PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Orme D, Freckleton R, Thomas G, Petzoldt T, Fritz S, Isaac N (2011) Caper: comparative analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R. http://R-Forge.R-project.org/projects/caper/
  49. Pagel M (1997) Inferring evolutionary processes from phylogenies. Zool Scr 26:331–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pagel M (1999) Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature 401:877–884PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pagel M (2002) Modelling the evolution of continuously varying characters on phylogenetic trees: the case of hominid cranial capacity. In: MacLeod N, Forey PL (eds) Morphology, shape and phylogeny. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 269–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pagel M, Lutzoni F (2002) Accounting for phylogenetic uncertainty in comparative studies of evolution and adaptation. In: Lässig M, Valleriani A (eds) Biological evolution and statistical physics. Springer, Berlin, pp 148–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pagel M, Meade A (2007) Bayes traits (http://www.evolution.rdg.ac.uk). 1.0 edn., Reading, UK
  54. Pagel MD (1994) The adaptationist wager. In: Eggleton P, Vane-Wright RI (eds) Phylogenetics and Ecology. Academic, London, pp 29–51Google Scholar
  55. Paradis E, Claude J, Strimmer K (2004) APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20:289–290PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Reader SM, Laland KN (2002) Social intelligence, innovation, and enhanced brain size in primates. PNAS 99:4436–4441PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Revell L (2010) Phylogenetic signal and linear regression on species data. Methods Ecol Evol 1:319–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Revell LJ (2008) On the analysis of evolutionary change along single branches in a phylogeny. Am Nat 172:140–147PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Revell LJ (2011) Phytools: an R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things). Methods Ecol EvolGoogle Scholar
  60. Rodseth L, Wrangham RW, Harrigan AM, Smuts BB, Dare R, Fox R, King B, Lee P, Foley R, Muller J, Otterbein K, Strier K, Turke P, Wolpoff M (1991) The human community as a primate society. Curr Anthropol 32:221–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rohlf FJ (2001) Comparative methods for the analysis of continuous variables: geometric interpretations. Evolution 55:2143–2160PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Safi K, Pettorelli N (2010) Phylogenetic, spatial and environmental components of extinction risk in carnivores. Global Ecol Biogeogr 19:352–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sherwood CC, Bauernfeind AL, Bianchi S, Raghanti MA, Hof PR (2012) Human brain evolution writ large and small. In: Hofman M, Falk D (eds) Evolution of the primate brain: from neuron to behavior, vol 195. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 237–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sherwood CC, Subiaul F, Zawidzki TW (2008) A natural history of the human mind: tracing evolutionary changes in brain and cognition. J Anat 212:426–454PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Tennie C, Call J, Tomasello M (2009) Ratcheting up the ratchet: on the evolution of cumulative culture. Philos Trans R Soc Lond (Biol) Biol Sci 364:2405–2415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tooby J, DeVore I (1987) The reconstruction of hominid behavioral evolution through strategic modeling. In: Kinzey WG (ed) The evolution of human behavior: primate models. State University of New York Press, Albany, pp 183–237Google Scholar
  67. van Schaik CP, van Noordwijk MA, Nunn CL (1999) Sex and social evolution in primates. In: Lee PC (ed) Comparative primate socioecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 204–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wrangham RW (2009) Catching fire: how cooking made us human. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Evolutionary AnthropologyDuke UniversityDurhamUSA
  2. 2.Department of StatisticsHarvard UniversityCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations