Advertisement

Creative Re-instrumentation of Collective Learning Activity

  • Terje Väljataga
  • Sebastian H. D. Fiedler
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7697)

Abstract

The implementation of networked, digital media applications in formal higher education provides opportunities for supporting and re-instrumenting various conversational and productive actions of creative collaboration. Successful re-instrumentation of collective learning activity depends to a large degree on the construction of viable, distributed environments of instruments and resources and a compatible perception of the potentials for actions (affordances) within its boundaries. This paper discusses some selected examples from an intervention study in higher education that focused on the self-directed re-instrumentation of collective learning activity and the formation and development of distributed learning environments.

Keywords

re-instrumentation creative collaboration learning contract affordances collective learning activity distributed learning environment 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Albrechtsen, H., Andersen, H.H.K., Bødker, S., Pejtersen, A.M.: Affordances in activity theory and cognitive systems engineering. Risø National Laboratory, Roskilde (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anderson, G., Boud, D.: Introducing learning contracts: a flexible way to learn. Innovation in Education and Teaching International 33(4) (1996)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anderson, G., Boud, D., Sampson, J.: Learning contracts: a practical guide. Routledge, New York (1996)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barab, S.A., Roth, W.-M.: Intentionally-bound systems and curricular-based ecosystems: An ecological perspective on knowing. Educational Researcher 35(5), 3–13 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boak, G.: A complete guide to learning contracts. Gower Publishing, Ltd., Hampshire (1998)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dede, C.: Emerging technologies and distributed learning. American Journal of Distance Education 10(2), 4–36 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Erdmann, J.W., Rückriem, G.: Lernkultur oder Lernkulturen – was ist neu an der Kultur des Lernens? In: Rückriem, G., Giest, H. (eds.) Tätitgkeitsteorie und (Wissens-)Gesellschaft, pp. 15–52. Lehmans Media, Berlin (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fiedler, S.H.D.: Emancipating and developing learning activity: Systemic intervention and re-instrumentation in higher education (2012), https://doria17-kk.lib.helsinki.fi/handle/10024/77017
  9. 9.
    Fiedler, S., Pata, K.: Distributed learning environments and social software: In search for a framework of design. In: Hatzipanagos, S., Warburton, S. (eds.) Handbook of Research on Social Software and Developing Community Ontologies, pp. 151–164. Information Science Reference, Hershey (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fiedler, S., Väljataga, T.: Interventions for second-order change in higher education: challenges and barriers. Electronic Journal of e-Learning 8(2), 85–92 (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fiedler, S., Väljataga, T.: Expanding the concept of learner control in higher education: consequences for intervention design. In: Aedo, I., Chen, N.-S., Sampson, D.G., Spector, J.M., Kinshuk (eds.) Proceedings of the 2011 11th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, pp. 262–264. IEEE Computer Society, Athens (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fiedler, S.H.D., Väljataga, T.: Personal learning environments: A conceptual landscape revisited. eLearning Papers (35), 1–16 (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gaver, W.W.: Situating action II: Affordances for interaction: The social is material for design. Ecological Psychology 8(2), 111–129 (1996)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gibson, J.J.: The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin, Boston (1979)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Giesecke, M.: Von den Mythen der Buchkultur zu den Visionen der Informationsgesellschaft: Trendforschung zur aktuellen Medienökologie. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a. M (2002)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Greeno, J.G.: Gibson’s affordances. Psychological Review 101(2), 236–342 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Harri-Augstein, S., Cameron-Webb, I.M.: Learning to change. A resource for trainers, managers and learners based on self organised learning. McGraw-Hill, London (1996)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Harri-Augstein, S., Thomas, L.: Learning conversations: the self-organised way to personal and organisational growth. Routledge, London (1991)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Harri-Augstein, S., Thomas, L.: A conversational framework for self-organised learning: Modelling personal meaning for effective action in the world. In: Luppicini, R. (ed.) Handbook of Conversation Design for Instructional Applications, pp. 308–342. IGI Global, New York (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Henri, F., Charlier, B., Limpens, F.: Understanding PLE as an essential component of the learning process. In: Luca, J., Weippl, E. (eds.) Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2008, pp. 3766–3770. Association for the Advancement of Computers in Education, Chesapeake (2008)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P.A., Jochems, W.: The sociability of computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Journal of Educational Technology & Society 5(1), 8–22 (2002)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lompscher, J., Hedegaard, M.: Learning activity and development: Introduction. In: Hedegaard, M., Lompscher, J. (eds.) Learning Activity and Development, pp. 10–21. Aarhus University Press, Aarhus (1999)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Stephenson, J., Laycock, M.: Using learning contracts in higher education. Kogan Page, London (1993)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Väljataga, T., Fiedler, S.: Competence advancement supported by social media. In: Kalz, M., Koper, R., Hornung-Prähauser, V., Luckmann, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the TEN Competence Special Technology Track on Technology Support for Self-Organised Learners, pp. 54–66 (2008)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Väljataga, T., Fiedler, S.: Supporting students to self-direct intentional learning projects with social media. Journal of Educational Technology & Society 12(3), 58–69 (2009)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Väljataga, T.: Learner control and responsibility: Expanding the concept of self-direction in higher education. Tampere University of Technology, Tampere (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Terje Väljataga
    • 1
  • Sebastian H. D. Fiedler
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Educational TechnologyTallinn UniversityTallinnEstonia

Personalised recommendations