A Web Content Accessibility Evaluation Process for Learning Objects in the Context of a Virtual Learning Environment

  • Cecilia Avila
  • Silvia Baldiris
  • Ramon Fabregat
  • Juan Carlos Guevara
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7697)


A wide variety of web content editors that are included on virtual learning environments, help teachers to create learning objects as web pages to support their teaching processes, those editors add some accessibility features to the generated web content . However in most of the cases, the generated web content is not always according to all Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG 2.0). As a result, teachers and students with disabilities could not properly use the web content in their learning or teaching process. In this paper, we introduce a plug-in for the TinyMCE web content editor to support the web content accessibility manual evaluation process by applying the Case Based Reasoning technique. It is useful, when teachers use the TinyMCE editor upon the ATutor virtual learning environment, because teachers can identify web accessibility failures that can be improved by using recommendations provided by human evaluators.


virtual learning environment learning objects web content accessibility accessibility evaluation case based reasoning 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Dunn, S.: Return to SENDA (Special Educational Needs and Disability Act)? Implementing accessibility for disabled students in virtual learning environments in UK further and higher education,
  2. 2.
    W3C - World Wide Web Consortium,
  3. 3.
    W3C - World Wide Web Consortium. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 (2012),
  4. 4.
    W3C - World Wide Web Consortium.: WCAG 2.0 Guidelines,
  5. 5.
    W3C - World Wide Web Consortium,
  6. 6.
    W3C - World Wide Web Consortium.: Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI),
  7. 7.
    Alonso, F., Fuertes, J.L., González, A.L., Martínez, L.: On the testability of WCAG 2.0 for beginners. In: 2010 International Cross Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A). ACM, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Branjnik, J., Yesilada, Y., Harper, S.: Testeability and validity of WCAG 2.0: The Expertise Effect. In: The 12th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. ACM, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Government of Ontario.: Achecker,
  10. 10.
    Wiratunga, N., Craw, S., Taylor, B., Davis, G.: Case-based reasoning for matching SMARTHOUSE technology to people’s needs. Knowledge-Based Systems 17, 139–146 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Menkovski, V., Metafas, D.A.: AI Model for Computer games based on Case Based Reasoning and AI Planning. In: The 3rd International Conference on Digital Interactive Media in Entertainment and Arts, pp. 295–302 (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mascarenhas, S.: Case Based Reasoning & Game AI (2010),
  13. 13.
    Finnie, G., Sun, Z.: R5 model for case-based reasoning. Knowledge-Based Systems 16, 59–65 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    ALTER-NATIVA.: European ALTER-NATIVA Project,
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
  17. 17.
  18. 18.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cecilia Avila
    • 1
  • Silvia Baldiris
    • 1
  • Ramon Fabregat
    • 1
  • Juan Carlos Guevara
    • 2
  1. 1.Institut D’informàtica i AplicacionsUniversitat de GironaGironaSpain
  2. 2.Facultad TecnológicaUniversidad Distrital Francisco José de CaldasBogotáColombia

Personalised recommendations