On the role of optimization in the cardiovascular system
Summary
This essay discusses in a very simple manner several aspects of the meaning of optimization in general and, particularly, the role of optimization in relation to the work and action of the heart. Starting out with historical considerations the role of the properties of the heart as a pump, its relation to the arterial system, the problem of pulsatility and blood pressure and the role of time intervals and coronary perfusion is discussed. Mathematical methods permit the calculation of the time course of the cardiac ejection which, under certain constraints, minimizes the energy consumption of the heart. The saving of energy by this optimization compared with a nonoptimal ejection pattern is rather small — in the order of a few percent. It is therefore interesting and important to discuss the physiological meaning of small variations of the cost-effect function. It seems that unexplained phenomena like synchronization of heart beat and respiration have something to do with an optimization process. The most important conclusion is that any optimization has to be seen as a process related to the functioning of the organism as a whole.
Key words
optimization cost function heart arterial systemPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Broemser PH (1935) Über die optimalen Beziehungen zwischen Herztätigkeit und physikalischen Konstanten des Gefäßsystems. Z Biol 96: 1–10Google Scholar
- 2.D’Argenio DZ (1979) Minimum Energy Expenditure as a Basis for Myocardial Regulation. Ph D Dissertation, University of Southern CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
- 3.Hämäläinen RP, Hämäläinen J, Miekkala U (1982) Optimal Control Modelling of Ventricular Ejection — do the Endpoint Conditions Dominate the Performance Criteria? Proceedings International Federation for Information Processing, Ghent, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
- 4.Kenner T (1979) Physical and Mathematical Modeling in Cardiovascular Systems. In: Hwang NHC, Gross Dr, Patel DJ (eds) Quantitative Cardiovascular Studies. Clinical Research Applications and Engineering Principles. Univ Park Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
- 5.Kenner T (1971) Dynamics and Control of Flow and Pressure in the Circulation. Kybernetik 9: 215–225PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Kenner T (1977) Zur Frage der Optimierung in der Abstimmung zwischen Herztätigkeit und Kreislauf. In: Festschrift zum 65. Geburtstag von H Reichel, HamburgGoogle Scholar
- 7.Kenner T, Pessenhofer H, Schwaberger G (1976) Method for the Analysis of the Entrainment between Heart Rate and Ventilation Rate. Pflügers Arch 363: 263–265PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Ono K, Uozumi T, Yoshimoto C, Kenner T (1982) The optimal Cardiovascular Regulation of the Arterial Blood Pressure. In: Kenner T, Busse R, Hinghofer-Szalkay H (eds) Cardiovascular System Dynamics: Models and Measurements. Plenum, London New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 9.Pennock B, Attinger EO (1968) Optimization of the Oxygen Transport System. Biophysical J 8: 879–896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Pfeiffer KP, Kenner T (1982) The optimal Strategy of Cardiac Ejection. In: Kenner T, Busse R, Hinghofer-Szalkay H (eds) Cardiovascular System Dynamics: Models and Measurements. Plenum Press, London New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 11.Pfeiffer KP, Kenner T, Schaefer J (1984) Application of Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Interval related Cardiac Performance Variations during Cardiac Arrhythmia in Man. Cardiovasc Res 18: 80–98PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Rosen R (1967) Optimality Principles in Biology. Butterworths, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 13.Suga H (1979) Minimal Oxygen consumption and optimal Contractility of the Heart: Theoretical Approach to Principle of Physiological Control of Contractility. Bull Math Biol 41: 139–150PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Wetterer E, Kenner T (1968) Dynamik des Arterienpulses. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar