Metrics for supply chain sustainability

  • Roland Clift
Chapter

Abstract

Most interpretations of sustainable development recognise that there are constraints on long-term human activities imposed by material and energy availability and by the capacity of the planet to accommodate wastes and emissions; inter-and intra-generational equity within these constraints is then an ethical principle underlying sustainability. This leads to identifying three dimensions of sustainable development: techno-economic, ecological and social. This paper reviews the development of indicators to reflect these three dimensions, applicable to industrial sectors, companies and broad groups of products or services. Indicators of environmental and economic performance are relatively well established. They can be combined to indicate the sustainability of products, services and supply chains. Indicators of social performance are more problematic, particularly indicators to describe the social value of products and services. Cases from the process, petroleum and petrochemicals, electronics and fast moving consumer goods sectors are reviewed, showing that social indicators must be developed through public participation.

Keywords

Supply Chain Gross Domestic Product Social Indicator Mobile Telephone Global Reporting Initiative 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Azapagic A, Perdan S (2000) Indicators of sustainable development for industry: a general framework, Trans. IChemE 73B: 243–261Google Scholar
  2. Banner M (1999) Why and how (not) to value the environment. Chapter 5 in “Christian eth-ics and contemporary moral problems”, Cambridge University Press, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Behmanesh N, Roque JA, Allen D (1993) An analysis of normalized measures of pollution prevention, Poll. Prey. Rev. Spring 1993: 161–166.Google Scholar
  4. Biswas G, Clift R, Davis G, Ehrenfeld J, Förster R, Jolliet O, Knoepfel I, Luterbacher U, Russell D, Hunkeler D (1998) Ecometrics: identification, categorisation, and life cycle validation. International Journal of LCA 3: 184–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clarke L, Clift R, Wehrmeyer W, King H, McKeown P (2002) Addressing employees’ concerns to facilitate environmentally conscious decision making innovation. 10th In- ternational Conference of the Greening of Industry Network, Göteborg, JuneGoogle Scholar
  6. Clayton AHJ, Radcliffe NJ (1996) Sustainability — a systems approach. Earthscan, London Clift R (1998) Engineering for the Environment: The New Model Engineer and Her Role. Trans. IChemE Vol. 76B: pp. 151–160Google Scholar
  7. Clift R (2000) Contribution to Forum on sustainability, Clean Products and Processes 2: 67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clift R (2001) Clean technology and industrial ecology. Chapter 16 (pp. 411–444) in R.M. Harrison, ed., “Pollution: causes, effects and control”, Royal Society of Chemistry, London (4th ed.)Google Scholar
  9. Clift R, Wright L (2000) Relationships between environmental impacts and added value along the supply chain. Tech. Forecasting and Social Change, 65, 281–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cunningham B, Wehrmeyer W, Clift R, Brewer L (2002) Integrating social concerns into the decision-making process associated with the petroleum industry. 10th International Conference of the Greening of Industry Network, Göteborg, JuneGoogle Scholar
  11. DETR (1999) A better quality of life. UK Depart. of Env., Transport and Rural Affairs, The Stationery Office, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. DETR (1999) Monitoring Progress: indicators for the strategy for sustainable development in the United Kingdom, UK Dept. of Env., Transport and Rural Affairs, The Stationery Office, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. ECTEL (1997) End-of-life management of cellular phones: an industry perspective and response, ECTEL Cellular Phones Takeback Working Group, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. IChem E (2002) The Sustainability Metrics — sustainable development progress metrics recommended for use in the Process Industries, Institution of Chemical Engineers, RugbyGoogle Scholar
  15. Jackson T (1996) Material concerns — pollution, profit and quality of life, Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. Jackson T, Clift R (1998) Where’s the profit in industrial ecology? J.Ind.Ecol. 2: 3–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lehni M (1999) Measuring eco-efficiency with cross-comparable indicators. WBCSD, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  18. Maslow A (1954) Motivation and personality. Harper and Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Max-Neef M, Elizade A, Hopenhayn M (1991) Human scale development — conception, application and further reflections. Apex Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. McLaren J, Parkinson SD, Jackson T (2000) Modelling material cascades — frameworks for the environmental assessment of recycling systems. Resources Conservation and Recycling 31: 83–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. OECD (2000) Framework for integrating socio-economic analysis in chemical risk management decision-making. Report ENV/JM/MONO (2000)5, Organisation for Economic and Cultural Development, ParisGoogle Scholar
  22. OECD (2002) Technical guidance document on the use of socio-economic analysis in chemical risk management decision-making. Report ENV/JM/MONO (2002)10, Organisation for Economic and Cultural Development, ParisGoogle Scholar
  23. Oxley Green AS, Wright L, Burningham K, Clift R (2002) Assessing the environmental views and concerns of Nokia employees as part of stakeholder participation. 10th International Conference of the Greening of Industry Network, Göteborg, JuneGoogle Scholar
  24. Ransome T, Clift R (2002) The supply, use and waste management of domestic clothes washing. Appendix C (pp. 205–230 ) in N. Wrisberg and H.A. Udo de Haes, eds. Analytical tools for environmental design and management in a systems perspective, Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  25. RCEP (1998) Setting Environmental Standards. 21st Report of the Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution, The Stationery Office, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. RCEP (2000) Energy: the changing climate. 22nd report of the Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution, The Stationery Office, LondonGoogle Scholar
  27. RCEP (2003) Chemicals in Products. 24th Report of the Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution, The Stationery Office, LondonGoogle Scholar
  28. Reid D (1995) Sustainable Development — an introductory guide. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  29. Saling P (2002) Realising more sustainable products and processes in different fields of business by application of the eco-efficiency analysis. NATO Advanced Research Workshop, MariborGoogle Scholar
  30. Taylor AP, Postlethwaite D (1996) Overall Business Impact Assessment (0B1A). 4`“ LCA Case Studies Symp, pp. 181–187, SETAC-Europe, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  31. WCED (1987) World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Fu-ture, Report of the Brundtland Commission. Oxford University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  32. Wilkinson R (2000) Mind the gap — hierarchies, health and human evolution. Weidenfeld and Nicolson, LondonGoogle Scholar
  33. Wright M, Allen D, Clift R, Sas H (1997) Measuring corporate environmental perform-ance: the ICI Environmental Burden system. Journal of Industrial ecology 1: 117–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zakotnik I, Radej B (2002) Environment as a factor of national competitiveness in manu-facturing. NATO Advanced Research Workshop, MariborGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roland Clift
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Environmental StrategyUniversity of SurreyGuildford, SurreyUK

Personalised recommendations