Advertisement

Multiple Sklerose

  • H. Wiethölter
Chapter
  • 63 Downloads

Zusammenfassung

Die multiple Sklerose (MS) ist eine der häufigsten neurologischen Erkrankungen, für deren Ursache es bislang keine einheitliche Erklärung gibt. Grundpfeiler der Diagnostik ist die Klinik, ergänzt durch die Magnetresonanztomographie (MRT). Eine Liquoruntersuchung zum Nachweis der entzündlichen Genese nachgewiesener multifokaler Störungen ist bei allen unklaren Fällen und bei älteren Patienten erforderlich. Zur Bestätigung und Verlaufskontrolle sind elektrophysiologische Verfahren hilfreich.

Literatur

Zitierte Literatur

  1. Bates D (1994) The diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Proceedings of the MS forum modern management workshop. Professional Postgraduate Services Europe, Worthing, U.K.Google Scholar
  2. Brønnum-Hansen H, Koch-Hendriksen N, Hyllested K (1994) Survival of patients with multiple sclerosis in Denmark: A nationwide, longterm epidemiologic survey. Neurology 44: 1901–1907PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burn DJ, Bull J, Lees AJ et al. (1991) A case of progressive encephalomyelitis with rigidity and positive antiglutamatic acid dehydrogenase antibodies. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 54:449–451PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fazekas F, Offenbacher H, Fuchs S et al. (1988) Criteria for an increased specificity of MRI interpretation in elderly subjects with suspected multiple sclerosis. Neurology 38:1822 – 1825PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Heckl RW (1994) Multiple Sklerose: Klinik, Differentialdiagnose, Behandlung. Thieme, Stuttgart New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Hohlfeld R (1995) Multiple Sklerose. Akt Neurol 22:125–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kesselring J, Ormerod IEC, Miller DH, Boulay EPGH du, McDonald WI (1989) Magnetic resonance imaging in multiple sclerosis — an atlas of diagnosis and differential diagnosis. Thieme, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  8. Krupp LB, Alvarez LA, LaRocca NG et al. (1988) Fatigue in multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol 45:435–437PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kurtzke JF (1983) Epidemiology of multiple sclerosis. In: Hallpike JF, Adams CWM, Tourtellotte WW (eds) Multiple sclerosis. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 47–95Google Scholar
  10. Mumford CJ, Wood NW, Kellar-Wood H (1994) The British isles survey of multiple sclerosis in twins. Neurology 44:11 – 15PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Paty DW, Li DK, the UBC MS/MRI Study Group and the IFNB Multiple Sclerosis Study Group (1993) Interferon beta-lb is effective in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. II. MRI analysis results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Neurology 43: 662 – 667PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Poser S, Wikström J, Bauer HJ et al. (1979) Clinical data and identification of special forms of multiple sclerosis in 1271 cases studied with a standardized documentation system. J Neurol Sci 40:159–168PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Poser CM, Paty DW, Scheinberg L et al. (1983) New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines for research protocols. Ann Neurol 13:227–231PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Robinson I (1991) The context and consequences of communicating the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. In: Wiethölter H, Dichgans J, Mertin J (eds) Current Concepts in Multiple Sclerosis. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 17 – 22Google Scholar
  15. Scheglmann K (1995) Multiple Sklerose: Multimodal evozierte Potentiale in der Diagnose. TW Neurol Psychiatr 9: 562–573Google Scholar
  16. Steinbrecher A, Dichgans J, Martin R (1995) Diagnostik und Therapie der multiplen Sklerose. Nervenheilkunde 14: 180–188Google Scholar
  17. Ter Meulen V (1988) Autoimmune reactions against myelin basic protein induced by corona and measles viruses. Ann N Y Sci 540: 202–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Weinshenker BC, Bass R, Rice GPA et al. (1989) The natural history of multiple sclerosis: a geographically based study. I. Clinical course and disability. Brain 112:133 – 146PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wood DD, Bilbao JM, O’Connors P, Moscarello MA (1996) Acute multiple sclerosis (Marburg type) is associated with de-velopementally immature myelin basic protein. Ann Neurol 40:18–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weiterführende Literatur

  1. Betts CD, Jones SJ, Fowler CG, Fowler CJ (1994) Erectile dysfunction in multiple sclerosis; associated neurological and neurophysiological deficits, and treatment of the condition. Brain 117:1303–1310PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Giovannoni G, Hartung H-P (1996) The immunopathogenesis of multiple sclerosis and Guillain-Barré syndrome. Curr Op Neurol 9:165–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Kesselring J (1993) Multiple Sklerose. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart Berlin KölnGoogle Scholar
  4. Matthews WB (ed) (1991) McAlpine’s Multiple Sclerosis. Churchill Livingstone, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  5. McFarland HF, Frand JA, Albert PS et al. (1992) Using gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging lesions to monitor disease activity in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 32:758–766PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Moulin DE (1989) Pain in multiple sclerosis. Neurol Clin 7: 321–331PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Poser S (1996) Diagnose. In: Poser S (Hrsg) Taschenbuch Multiple Sklerose. Blackwell, Berlin Wien, S 53 – 87Google Scholar
  8. Seidel D (1995) Multiple Sklerose — Symptomatische Therapie und Rehabilitation. TW Neurol Psychiatr 9: 574–582Google Scholar
  9. The IFNB Multiple Sclerosis Study Group (1993) Interferon beta-lb is effective in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. I. Clinical results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Neurology 43: 655–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Wiethölter H (1992) Multiple Sklerose. In: Hopf H Ch, Poeck K, Schliack H (Hrsg) Neurologie in Praxis und Klinik. Thieme, Stuttgart New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Wiethölter

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations