Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Corporate Ethics and Management Theory

  • Chapter
Contemporary Economic Ethics and Business Ethics

Part of the book series: Studies in Economic Ethics and Philosophy ((SEEP))

Abstract

In what follows we try to develop a concise line of reasoning concerning a conceptual clarification of the relationship between corporate ethics and management. Our proposal will draw from philosophical considerations developed by philosophers of the methodical constructivism of the so-called Erlangen-School (Lorenzen 1968, 1981, 1982, 1987a, 1987b, Kambartel 1989). We use the term “corporate ethics” instead of (the more fuzzy term) “business ethics” to stress that the focus of our paper is the firm and not the economy as a whole. The word “management” denotes all actions which are directed towards the (purposeful) co-ordination of corporate activities by which the transformation of goods and services is accomplished (i.e., procurement, operations, logistics, marketing etc.). These actions are traditionally grouped in five “managerial functions” under the headings of (1) planning, (2) organising, (3) staffing, (4) leading (directing), and (5) control (Koontz/O’Donnell 1964). Management theory then is the body of knowledge about managerial functions developed to describe, understand (or explain) and improve management practice. Note that this definition implies an approach to the field of management which is guided by the theory of action (instead, e.g., by systems theory).

We would like to thank Stanley Deetz and Brigitte Kustermann for helpful comments on the earlier drafts of this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albert, H.: Treatise on Critical Reason, Princeton (University Press) 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Original: Traktat über kritische Vernunft, Tübingen (J. C. B. Mohr [P. S iebeck]) 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson, M., Willmott, H.: Making Sense of Management. A Critical Introduction, London (Sage) 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apel, K. -O.: Towards a Transformation of Philosophy, London (Routledge & Kegan Paul) 1980. Original: Transformation der Philosophie, Frankfurt a. M. (Suhrkamp) 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J., Debreu, G.: “Existence of an Equilibrium for a Competitive Economy”, Econometrica, 22 (1954), pp. 265–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J., Hahn, F.: General Competitive Analysis, San Francisco (HoldenDay) 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boddewyn, J. J.: “The Legitimacy of International-Business Political Behaviour”, The International Trade Journal, IX, No. 1 (1995), pp. 143–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christenson, Ch.: “Proposal for a Program of Empirical Research into the Properties of Triangles”, Decision Sciences, 4 (1976), pp. 631–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daft, R. L., Lewin, A. J.: “Where Are the Theories of the’New’ Organisational Forms? An Editorial Essay”, Organisational Science, 4 (1993), pp. i-vi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, D. R., Metzger, M. B., Hill, J. W.: “The “New” U.S. Sentencing Commission Guidelines: A Wake-Up Call for Corporate America”, Academy of Management Executive, 8 (1994), pp. 7–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Deetz, St.: Democracy in an Age of Corporate Colonization: Developments in Communication and the Politics of Everyday Life, Albany (State University of New York Press) 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deetz, St.: Transforming Communication, Transforming Business, Cresskill, N.J. (Hampton Press) 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbing, J. (Ed.): Infant Feeding. Anatomy of a Controversy 1973–1984, London 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunfee, Th. W.: “On the Synergistic, Interdependent Relationship of Business Ethics and Law”, American Business Law Journal, 34 (Winter 1996) 2, pp. 318–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, J. A.: The Limits of Reason. Indeterminacy in Law, Education, and Morality, New Brunswick (Transaction Publishers) 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, O. C., Leclair, D. T., Ferrell, L.: “The Federal Sentencing Guidelines for Organizations: A Framework for Ethical Comliance”, Journal of Business Ethics, 17 (1998), pp. 353–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, R. C., Fottler, M. D.: “Empowerment: A Matter of Degree”, Academy of Management Review, 9 (1995), pp. 21–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M.: Power/Knowledge, Brighton (Harvester Press) 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E.: Strategic Management. A Stakeholder Approach, Boston (Pitman) 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal, S., Moran, P.: “Bad for Practice: A Critique of the Transaction Cost Theory”, Academy of Management Review, 21 (1996), pp. 13–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A.: The Constitution of Society. Outline of the Theory of Structuration, Cambridge, Mass. (Polity Press), 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A.: Kritische Theoie der Spätmoderne, Wien (Passagen Verlag) 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greider, W.: One World, Ready or Not. The Manic Logic of Global Capitalism, New York (Simon & Schuster) 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, R. D.: “Ethics — A Global Business Challenge”, Vital Speeches of the Day, 60, No. 16 (1994), pp. 506–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J.: The Theory of Communicative Action. Volume 2, Cambridge (Polity Press) 1987. Original: Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, Band 2, Frankfurt a. M. (Suhrkamp) 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J.: “Discourse Ethics: Notes on a Program of Philosophical Justification”, in: J. Habermas: Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action, Cam- bridge, Mass. (The Mit Press) 1990, pp. 43–115. Original: “Diskursethik. Notizen zu einem Begründungsprogramm”, in: J. Habermas: Moralbewuβtsein und kommunikatives Handeln, Frankfurt a. M. (Suhrkamp) 1983, pp. 53–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J.: “Remarks on Discourse Ethics”, in: J. Habermas: Justification and Application. Remarks on Discourse Ethics, Cambridge, Mass. (The Mit Press) 1993, pp. 19–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Original: “Erläuterungen zur Diskursethik”, in: J. Habermas: Erläuterungen zur Diskursethik, Frankfurt a. M. (Suhrkamp) 1991, p. 119–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, N., Young, St.: The Economics of Multinational Enterprise, London (Longman) 1979:

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer, L. T.: “Why be Moral? A Different Rationale for Managers”, Business Ethics Quarterly, 4 (1994), pp. 191–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer, L. T.: “Why be Moral? A Reply to Shaw and Corvino”, Business Ethics Quarterly, 7 (1997), pp. 137–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janich, P.: Was ist Wahrheit?, München (Beck) 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kambartel, F.: “Vernunft: Kriterium oder Kultur?”, in: F. Kambartel: Philosophie der humanen Welt, Frankfurt a. M. (Suhrkamp) 1989, pp. 27–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kambartel, F.: “Die Vernunft und das Allgemeine. Zum Verständnis rationaler Sprache und Praxis”, in: V. Gerhard, N. Herold (Eds.): Perspektiven des Perspektivismus. Gedenkschriftzum Tode Friedrich Kaulbachs, Würzburg (Königshausen und Neumann) 1992, pp. 265–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kambartel, F.: Wahrheit und Begründung, Erlangen/Jena (Palm & Enke) 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kambartel, F.: “Vernunftkultur und Kulturrelativismus. Bemerkungen zu verschiedenen Problemen des Verstehens und Begründens”, in: H. Steinmann, A. G. Scherer (Eds.): Zwischen Universalismus und Relativismus. Philosophische Grundlagenprobleme des Interkulturellen Managements, Frankfurt a. M. (Suhrkamp) 1999, pp. 212–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koontz, H., O’Donnell, C.: Principles of Management, New York (Mc GrawHill) 3rd ed. 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B.: “Designing Global Strategies. Profiting from Operational Flexibility”, Sloan Management Review, 27 (1985), pp. 27–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korten, D. C.: When Corporations Rule the World, West Hartford (Kumarian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, J. W.: “Ethics in Business: What Managers Practice that Economists Ignore”, Business Ethics Quarterly, 2 (1992), pp. 305–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E. E.: The Ultimate Advantage. Creating the High-Involvement Organisation, San Francisco (Jossey-Bass) 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löhr, A.: Unternehmensethik und Betriebswirtschaftslehre. Untersuchungen zur theoretischen Stützung der Unternehmenspraxis, Stuttgart (M&P) 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzen, P.: “Methodical Thinking”, in: P. Lorenzen: Constructive Philosophy, Amherst, Mass. (The University of Massachusetts Press) 1987, pp. 3–29. Original: “Methodisches Denken”, in: P. Lorenzen: Methodisches Denken, Frankfurt a. M. (Suhrkamp) 1968, pp. 24–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzen, P.: “Political Anthropology”, in: P. Lorenzen: Constructive Philosophy, Amherst, Mass. (The University of Massachusetts Press) 1987, pp. 42–55. Original: “Politische Anthropologie”, in: O. Schwemmer (Ed.): Vernunft, Handlung und Erfahrung, München (Beck) 1981, pp. 104–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzen, P.: “Ethics and the Philosophy of Science”, in: D. E. Christensen et al. (Eds.): Contemporary German Philosophy, Volume 1, University Park (The Pennsylvania State University Press) 1982, pp. 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzen, P. (1987a): Constructive Philosophy, Amherst (The University of Massachusetts Press) 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzen, P. (1987b): Lehrbuch der konstruktiven Wissenschaftstheorie, Mannheim (Bi-Wissenschaftsverlag) 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzen, P.: “Philosophische Fundierungsprobleme einer Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik”, in: H. Steinmann, A. LÖHr (Eds.): Unternehmensethik, Stuttgart (Poeschel) 1989, pp. 25–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lueken, G.-L.: “Incommensurability, Rules of Argumentation, and Anticipation”, in: F. H. Van Eemeren et al. (Eds.): Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Argumentation, Amsterdam (SicSat) 1991, pp. 244–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lueken, G.-L.: Inkommensurabilität als Problem rationalen Argumentierens, Stuttgart-Bad-Cannstatt (Frommann-Holzboog) 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J.-F.: The Postmodern Condition, Manchester (Manchester University Press) 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, H.-P., Schumann, H.: Die Globalisierungsfalle. Der Angriff auf Demokratie und Wohlstand, Reinbek bei Hamburg (Rowohlt) 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H.: The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning, New York (Free Press) 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H., Waters, J. A.: “Of Strategies, Deliberate and Emergent”, Strategic Management Journal, 6 (1985), pp. 257–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittelstrass, J.: “Changing Concepts of the A Priori”, in: R. E. Butts, J. Hintikka (Eds.): Historical and Philosophical Dimensions of Logic. Methodology and Philosophy of Science, Dordrecht, (D. Reidel), 1977 pp. 3–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittelstrass, J.: “Scientific Rationality and Its Reconstruction”, in: N. Rescher (Ed.): Reason and Rationality in Natural Science, Lanham, Md (University Press of America) 1985, pp. 83–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohrman, S. A., Cohen, S. G., Mohrman, A. M. Jr.: Designing Team-Based Organisations. New Forms for Knowledge Work. San Francisco (Jossey-Bass) 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monks, R. A. G., Minow, N.: Corporate Governance, Cambridge, Mass. (Basil Blackwell) 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, I., Swenson, W. M.: “The Federal Sentencing Guidelines for Corporations: Their Development, Theoretical Underpinnings, and Some Thoughts About Their Future”, Washington University Law Quarterly, 71, 2 (1993) pp. 205–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H.: The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation, New York (Oxford University Press) 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohmae, K.: The End of the Nation State. The Rise of Regional Economics, New York (Free Press) 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orts, E. W.: “The Legitimacy of Multinational Corporations”, in: L. E. Mitchell (Ed.): Progressive Corporate Law, Boulder (Westview Press) 1995, pp. 247–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterloh, M., Frey, B.: “Managing Innovation: Crowding Effects in the Theory of the Firm”, in: Institut FüR Betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung: Diskussionsbeitrag Nr. 31, Zürich (Universität Zürich) 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paine, L. S. (1994a): “Organising with Integrity”, Harvard Business Review, 72 (March-April 1994), pp. 106–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paine, L. S. (1994b): “Law, Ethics, and Managerial Judgement”, The Journal of Legal Studies Education, 12 (Summer/Fall 1994) 2, pp. 153–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paine, L. S.: “Moral Thinking in Management: An Essential Capability”, Business Ethics Quarterly, 6 (1996), pp. 477–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. : Competitive Advantage Through People: Unleashing the Power of the Work Force, Boston (Harvard Business School Press) 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preble, J. F.: “Towards a Comprehensive System of Strategic Control”, Journal of Management Studies, 29 (1992), pp. 391–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preble, J. F.: “The Role of’Good Conversation’ in Strategic Control”, Journal ofManagement Studies, 33 (1996), pp. 381–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sagal, P. T.: “Paul Lorenzen’s Constructivism and the Recovery of Philosophy”, Synthesis Philosophica, 3 (1987), pp. 173–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A. G., Dowling, M. J.: “Towards a Reconciliation of the TheoryPluralism in Strategic Management - Incommensurability and the Constructivist Approach of the Erlangen-School”, Advances in Strategic Management, 12A (1995), pp. 195–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A. G., Steinmann, H.: “Some Remarks on the Problem of Incommensurability in Organisation Studies”, paper presented at the Academy of Management annual meeting, Boston, Mass., Aug. 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, D.: “Unternehmensethik und Gewinnprinzip in der Betriebswirtschaftslehre”, Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, 42 (1990), pp. 869–891.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreyögg, G., Steinmann, H.: “Strategic Control. A New Perspective”, Academy of Management Review, 12 (1987), pp. 91–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, R.: Levers of Control - How Managers Use Innovative Control Systems to Drive Strategic Renewal, Boston, Mass. (Harvard Business School Press) 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, R. C.: “Corporate Roles, Personal Virtues: An Aristotelian Approach to Business Ethics”, Business Ethics Quarterly, 2 (1992), pp. 317–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spender, J.-C.: “Strategic Theorizing: Expanding the Agenda”, Advances in Strategic Management, 8 (1992), pp. 3–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spender, J.-C.: “Villain, Victim or Visionary?: The Insights and Flaws in F. W. Taylor’s Ideas”, in: J.-C. Spender, H. J. Kijne (Eds.): Scientific Management. Frederick Winslow Taylor’s Gift to the World? Boston/Dordrecht/London (Kluwer) 1996, pp. 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinmann, H., Kustermann, B.: “Die Managementlehre auf dem Weg zu einem neuen Steuerungsparadigma”, Journal fiir Betriebswirtschaft, 46, No. 5–6 (1996), pp. 265–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinmann, H., Kustermann, B.: “Management Theory on the Way to a New Paradigm? Critical Reflections on the Concept of Robert Simons”, in: S. Urban (Ed.): Europe’s Economic Future, Wiesbaden (Gabler) (in print).

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinmann, H., Löhr, A.: Grundlagen der Unternehmensethik, Stuttgart (Poeschel) 2nd ed. 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinmann, H., Löhr, A.: “A Republican Concept of Corporate Ethics”, in S. Urban (Ed.): Europe’s Challenges. Economic Efficiency and Social Solidarity, Wiesbaden (Gabler) 1996, pp. 21–60:

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinmann, H., Olbrich, Th.: “Business Ethics in U.S.-Corporations. Some Preliminary Results from an Interview Series”, Journal für Betriebswirtschaft, 45 (1995), pp. 317–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinmann, H., Olbrich, Th.: “Ethik-Management: Integrierte Steuerung ethischer und ökonomischer Prozesse”, in: G. Blickle (Ed.): Ethik in Organisationen, Göttingen (Verlag für angewandte Phsychologie) 1998, pp. 95–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinmann, H., Scherer, A. G.: “Lernen durch Argumentieren: Theoretische Probleme konsensorientierten Handelns”, in: Albach, H. (Ed.). Globale Soziale Marktwirtschaft. Ziele - Wege - Akteure. Festschrift für Santiago Garcia Ecchevaria, Wiesbaden (Gabler) 1994, pp. 263–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinmann, H., Scherer, A. G.: “Corporate Ethics and Global Business. Philosophical Considerations on Intercultural Management”, in: B. N. Kumar, H. Steinmann (Eds.): Ethics in International Business, Berlin/New York (De Gruyter) 1998, pp. 13–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinmann, H., Scherer, A. G.: “Interkulturelles Management zwischen Universalismus und Relativismus. Kritische Anfragen der Betriebswirtschaftslehre an die Philosophie”, in: H. Steinmann, A. G. Scherer (Eds.): Zwischen Universalismus und Relativismus. Philosophische Grundlagenprobleme des Interkulturellen Managements, Frankfurt a. M. (Suhrkamp) 1999, pp. 23–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinmann, H., Schreyg, G.: Management. Grundlagen der Unternehmensführung, Wiesbaden (Gabler) 4th ed. 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinmann, H., Zerfaββ, A.: “Privates Unternehmertum und öffentliches Interesse”, in: G. R. Wagner (Ed.): Betriebswirtschaft und Umweltschutz, Stuttgart (Schäffer-Poeschel) 1993, pp. 3–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, Ch. D.: Where the Law Ends, New York (Harper and Row) 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, R. S., Clermont, K. M., Hillman, R. A., Johnson, S. L., Barcelo, J. J. Iii, Provone, D. M.: Law: Its Nature, Functions, and Limits, St. Paul (West Publishing) 3rd ed. 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurow, L. C.: The Future of Capitalism. How Today’s Economic Forces Shape Tomorrow’s World, New York (William Morrow & Co) 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, P.: Transformation der ökonomischen Vernunft. Fortschrittsperspektiven der modernen Industriegesellschaft, Bern/Stuttgart (Haupt) 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, P.: Integrative Wirtschaftsethik. Grundlagen einer lebensdienlichen Ökonomie, Stuttgart/Wien (Haupt) 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department Of Commerce: Model Business Principles, New York Times, May 27, 1995, p. 17, http://www.depaul.edu/ethics/principles.html

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department Of State: Promoting the Model Business Principles, Publication 10486, Released June 1997, Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labour, http://www.state.gov/www/global/human rights/business principles.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, B.: Imperialism: Pioneer of Capitalism, London (Nlb) 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaeger, P. C.: The Limits of Law. Public Regulation of Private Pollution, Cambridge (Cambridge University Press) 1991.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Horst Steinmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andreas Georg Scherer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Ethical Economy and Business Culture, The Hannover Institute of Philosophical Research, Gerberstr. 26, D-30169, Hannover, Germany

    Peter Koslowski

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Steinmann, H., Scherer, A.G. (2000). Corporate Ethics and Management Theory. In: Koslowski, P. (eds) Contemporary Economic Ethics and Business Ethics. Studies in Economic Ethics and Philosophy. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04072-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04072-0_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-08591-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-04072-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation