Advertisement

Who’s Up? Global Interpersonal Temporal Accessibility

  • Andrew S. Harvey
  • Paul A. Macnab
Part of the Advances in Spatial Science book series (ADVSPATIAL)

Abstract

A petroleum executive sitting at her desk in Houston knows when a satellite phone call might find her chief geologist hard at work in Uzbekistan, but this is nothing new. Since the end of the World War II, many a British veteran has maintained scheduled weekly contact with ham radio comrades half-a-day away in Australasia. And long before the Tokyo Stock Exchange operated on a 24-hour cycle, brokers in New York City knew when to reach colleagues at the office in Japan; if they weren’t certain, all they had to do was glance up at one of the half dozen or so clocks mounted on the wall. Even new initiates to the World Wide Web learn quickly that file transfers can be expedited by downloading from sites in countries where most of the population lies dormant. Computer-mediated communication across time zones surely must reach its zenith in emergency tele-medicine: interactive specialists in Toronto, Paris, and Auckland confer while viewing digital injuries sent from backpack transmitters by doctors on the ground in war-torn Bosnia. Fine and well, but when might a Japanese child log on in the classroom to chat with a virtual pen-pal in Canada? Chances are, never. Even in the near future of affordable webcams, speech recognition, and simultaneous translation, it will be impossible for students in Halifax to converse with sister-city pupils in Hakodate. Why? When Japanese students start school at 9 o’clock in the morning, it is 10 o’clock at night on Canada’s east coast. Simply put, one city or the other is always going to be asleep.

Keywords

Social Space General Social Survey Time Zone Social Circle Coupling Constraint 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allardt, E. 1990. Challenges for comparative social research. Acta Sociologica 33(3): 183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barker, R.G. 1951. One Boy’s Day: A Specimen Record of Behaviour. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  3. Batty, M. 1996. Visualizing Urban Dynamics. In Longley, P. and Batty, M. (eds.) Spatial Modelling in a GIS Environment. Cambridge UK: Geoinformation International, 297–320.Google Scholar
  4. Batty, M. 1997. Virtual geography. Future 29(4/5):337–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cairncross, F. 1995. The death of distance: a survey of telecommunications. The Economist 336(7934):5–28.Google Scholar
  6. Dodge, M. 1996. Mapping the World Wide Web. GIS Europe 5(9):22–4.Google Scholar
  7. Egenhofer, M.J. and Golledge, R.G. (eds.). 1998. Spatial and Temporal Reasoning in Geographic Information Systems. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Fellmann, J., Getis, A. and Getis J. 1990. Human Geography, Second Edition. Dubuque IA: Wm.Google Scholar
  9. C. Brown. Giddens, A. 1990. The Consequences of Modernity. California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Goodchild, M.F. and Janelle, D.G. 1984. The city around the clock: space-time patterns of urban ecological structure. Environment and Planning A 16:807–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Graham, S. and Marvin, S. 1996. Telecommunications and the City: Electronic Spaces, Urban Places. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hägerstrand, T. 1970. What about people in regional science? Papers and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association, 24:7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hägerstrand, T. 1973. The domain of human geography. In Chorley, R.J. (ed.) Directions in Geography. London: ethuen & Co. Ltd, 67–87.Google Scholar
  14. Harvey, A.S. 1997. From activities to activity settings. In Ettema, D. and Timmermans, H. (eds.) Activity-based Approaches to Travel Analysis. Tarrytown NY: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  15. Harvey, A.S. 1982. Role and context: Shapers of behaviour. Studies of Broadcasting 18:70–92.Google Scholar
  16. Harvey, A.S., Taylor, M.E., Ellis, S. and Aas, D. 1997. 24-Hour Society and Passenger Travel. Report cmmissioned by Transport Research Centre, Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management. Rotterdam.Google Scholar
  17. Information Highway Advisory Council. 1995. Access, Affordability and Universal Service on the Canadian Information Highway. Ottawa: Supply and Services Canada.Google Scholar
  18. Janelle, D.G. 1995. Metropolitan Expansion, Telecommuting, and Transportation. In S. Hanson, S. (ed.) The Geography of Urban Transportation, Second Edition. New York: Guilford Press, 407–34.Google Scholar
  19. Janelle, D.G., Klinkenberg, B. and Goodchild, M.F. 1998. The temporal ordering of urban space and daily activity patterns for population role groups. Geographical Systems 5:117–37.Google Scholar
  20. Jiang, B. and Ormeling, F.J. 1997. Cybermap: The map for cyberspace. The Cartographic Journal 34(2): 111–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kling, R. (ed.)- 1996. Computerization and Controversy: Value Conflicts and Social Choices. Second Edition. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  22. Langran, G. 1992. Time in Geographic Information Systems. Bristol PA: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  23. Lewin, K. 1951. Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  24. Neilsen Canada Ltd. Personal communication, 1998.Google Scholar
  25. MacEachren, A.M. 1995. How Maps Work: Representation, Visualization and Design. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  26. Maslow, A.H. 1954. Motivation and personality. Harper’s Psychological Series. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  27. Pirie, G.H. 1979. Measuring accessibility: A review and proposal. Environment and Planning 4:11:299–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rheingold, H. 1993. The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  29. Salomon, I. 1988. Geographical variations in telecommunications systems: The implications for location of activities. Transportation 14:311–27.Google Scholar
  30. Schneider, A. 1972. Patterns of Social Interaction. The Use of Time: Daily Activities of Urban and Suburban Populations in Twelve Countries. The Netherlands: Mouton & Co.Google Scholar
  31. Schüler, D. 1996. New Community Networks: Wired for Change. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley. Statistics Canada, General Social Survey,Google Scholar
  32. Cycle J, 1992. Vasiliev, I. 1996. Design issues to be considered when mapping time. In Wood, C.H, and Keller, C.P. (eds.) Cartographic Design: Theoretical and Practical Perspectives. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 137–46.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew S. Harvey
    • 1
  • Paul A. Macnab
    • 2
  1. 1.Time Use Research Program, Department of EconomicsHalifaxCanada
  2. 2.Department of GeographySaint Mary’s UniversityHalifaxCanada

Personalised recommendations