Taccaceae

  • K. Kubitzki
Chapter
Part of the The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants book series (FAMILIES GENERA, volume 3)

Abstract

Perennial herbs from a solid, starchy, tuberous, globose, or elongated, vertical or horizontal rhizome; indumentum of minute pluricellular hairs present on young parts. Leaves all basal, large, long-petiolate with entire, pinnatifid, palmately partite, or palmatisect blade with pinnately divided segments, appearing together with the inflorescence; venation palmate or pinnate, with a secondary network. Inflorescence borne on a radical scape, involucrate, cymose, umbel-like; involucral bracts (2−)4(−12); floral bracts numerous, filiform, drooping, sometimes inconspicuous. Flowers bisexual, actinomorphic, epigynous; tepals 6, all dark-coloured, more or less petaloid; stamens 6 in 2 whorls, attached to perianth tube or to base of tepals; filaments short, flat and somewhat petaloid, forming, together with the broad connectives, a sort of hood over the inflexed anther; anther tetrasporangiate and dithecal, introrse, opening by longitudinal slits; ovary 6-ribbed, inferior, tricarpellate, unilocular, with more or less intruded parietal placentas, each with numerous ovules; septal nectaries present in several species; disc rarely (T. leontopetaloides) present but nectar secretion doubtful; style 1, provided with 3 incised wings; stigmatic branches 3, obcordate, often petaloid; ovules pendulous, anatropous, bitegmic, crassinucellar. Fruit a berry or a loculicidal capsule; seeds strongly ribbed, sometimes with a thin fleshy aril and fleshy raphe; embryo small; endosperm copious, more or less cartilaginous, storing protein and fat, but no starch and no or little hemicellulose. n = 15.

Keywords

General Reference Secondary Network Floral Bract Involucral Bract Arnold Arbor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Selected Bibliography

  1. Bouman, F.: 1995. Seed structure and systematics in Dioscoreales. In: Rudall, P.J., Cribb, P.J., Cutler, D.F., Humphries, C.J. (eds.) Monocotyledons: systematics and evolution. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, pp. 139–156.Google Scholar
  2. Burkill, I.H.: 1960. The organography and evolution of Dioscoreaceae, the family of yams. J. Linn. Soc. Lond. Bot. 56: 319–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carter, S.: 1962. Taccaceae. In: Flora of Tropical East Africa. 4 pp. London: Crown Agents.Google Scholar
  4. Chase, M.W. et al. 1995. See general references.Google Scholar
  5. Dahlgren, R., Clifford, H.T.: 1982. See general references. Daumann, E. 1970. Das Blütennektarium der Monocotyledonen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung seiner systematischen und phylogenetischen Bedeutung. Feddes Repert. 80: 463–590.Google Scholar
  6. Davis, G.L.: 1966. See general references.Google Scholar
  7. Drenth, E.: 1972. A revision of the family Taccaceae. Blumea 20: 367–406.Google Scholar
  8. Drenth, E.: 1976. Taccaceae. In: van Steenis, C.G.G.J. (ed.) Flora Males. I, 7: 806–819. Leyden: Noordhoff.Google Scholar
  9. Eichler, A.W.: 1879. In: LXVII. Sitzung vom 27. Juni 1879, pp. 106–108.Google Scholar
  10. Eichler, A.W.: Sitzungsber. Bot. Ver. Prov. Brandenburg 21: 106–108.Google Scholar
  11. Endress, P.K.: 1995. Major evolutionary traits of monocot flowers. pp. 43–79. In: Rudall et al. 1995. See general references.Google Scholar
  12. Fahn, A.: 1954. Metaxylem elements in some families of the monocotyledons. New Phytol. 53: 530–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goebel, K.: 1931. Blütenbildung und Sproßgestaltung. Zweiter Ergänzungsband zur Organographie der Pflanzen. Jena: G. Fischer.Google Scholar
  14. Hegnauer, R.: 1963, 1986. See general references.Google Scholar
  15. Huber, H.: 1969, 1991. See general references.Google Scholar
  16. Limpricht, W.: 1928. Taccaceae. In: Engler, A. (ed.) Das Pflanzenreich IV. 42. Leipzig: W. Engelmann.Google Scholar
  17. Ling Ping-Ping: 1981. Stomatal studies in Chinese Taccaceae with a discussion on its taxonomical significance. Bull. Nanjing Bot. Gard. Mem. Sun Yat Sen 1981: 20–24.Google Scholar
  18. Rao, V.S.: 1969. The vascular anatomy of Tacca pinnatifida. J. Univ. Bombey 38. 65: 18–24.Google Scholar
  19. Saw, L.G.: 1993. Tacca: flowering and fruiting behaviour. Nat. Malaysiana 18: 3–6.Google Scholar
  20. Takhtajan, A.L.: 1982. See general references.Google Scholar
  21. Zavada, M.S.: 1983. Comparative morphology of monocot pollen and evolutionary trends of apertures and pollen wall structures. Bot. Rev. 49: 331–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Kubitzki

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations