Flowering Plants · Monocotyledons pp 425-428 | Cite as
Taccaceae
Abstract
Perennial herbs from a solid, starchy, tuberous, globose, or elongated, vertical or horizontal rhizome; indumentum of minute pluricellular hairs present on young parts. Leaves all basal, large, long-petiolate with entire, pinnatifid, palmately partite, or palmatisect blade with pinnately divided segments, appearing together with the inflorescence; venation palmate or pinnate, with a secondary network. Inflorescence borne on a radical scape, involucrate, cymose, umbel-like; involucral bracts (2−)4(−12); floral bracts numerous, filiform, drooping, sometimes inconspicuous. Flowers bisexual, actinomorphic, epigynous; tepals 6, all dark-coloured, more or less petaloid; stamens 6 in 2 whorls, attached to perianth tube or to base of tepals; filaments short, flat and somewhat petaloid, forming, together with the broad connectives, a sort of hood over the inflexed anther; anther tetrasporangiate and dithecal, introrse, opening by longitudinal slits; ovary 6-ribbed, inferior, tricarpellate, unilocular, with more or less intruded parietal placentas, each with numerous ovules; septal nectaries present in several species; disc rarely (T. leontopetaloides) present but nectar secretion doubtful; style 1, provided with 3 incised wings; stigmatic branches 3, obcordate, often petaloid; ovules pendulous, anatropous, bitegmic, crassinucellar. Fruit a berry or a loculicidal capsule; seeds strongly ribbed, sometimes with a thin fleshy aril and fleshy raphe; embryo small; endosperm copious, more or less cartilaginous, storing protein and fat, but no starch and no or little hemicellulose. n = 15.
Keywords
General Reference Secondary Network Floral Bract Involucral Bract Arnold ArborPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Selected Bibliography
- Bouman, F.: 1995. Seed structure and systematics in Dioscoreales. In: Rudall, P.J., Cribb, P.J., Cutler, D.F., Humphries, C.J. (eds.) Monocotyledons: systematics and evolution. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, pp. 139–156.Google Scholar
- Burkill, I.H.: 1960. The organography and evolution of Dioscoreaceae, the family of yams. J. Linn. Soc. Lond. Bot. 56: 319–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Carter, S.: 1962. Taccaceae. In: Flora of Tropical East Africa. 4 pp. London: Crown Agents.Google Scholar
- Chase, M.W. et al. 1995. See general references.Google Scholar
- Dahlgren, R., Clifford, H.T.: 1982. See general references. Daumann, E. 1970. Das Blütennektarium der Monocotyledonen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung seiner systematischen und phylogenetischen Bedeutung. Feddes Repert. 80: 463–590.Google Scholar
- Davis, G.L.: 1966. See general references.Google Scholar
- Drenth, E.: 1972. A revision of the family Taccaceae. Blumea 20: 367–406.Google Scholar
- Drenth, E.: 1976. Taccaceae. In: van Steenis, C.G.G.J. (ed.) Flora Males. I, 7: 806–819. Leyden: Noordhoff.Google Scholar
- Eichler, A.W.: 1879. In: LXVII. Sitzung vom 27. Juni 1879, pp. 106–108.Google Scholar
- Eichler, A.W.: Sitzungsber. Bot. Ver. Prov. Brandenburg 21: 106–108.Google Scholar
- Endress, P.K.: 1995. Major evolutionary traits of monocot flowers. pp. 43–79. In: Rudall et al. 1995. See general references.Google Scholar
- Fahn, A.: 1954. Metaxylem elements in some families of the monocotyledons. New Phytol. 53: 530–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Goebel, K.: 1931. Blütenbildung und Sproßgestaltung. Zweiter Ergänzungsband zur Organographie der Pflanzen. Jena: G. Fischer.Google Scholar
- Hegnauer, R.: 1963, 1986. See general references.Google Scholar
- Huber, H.: 1969, 1991. See general references.Google Scholar
- Limpricht, W.: 1928. Taccaceae. In: Engler, A. (ed.) Das Pflanzenreich IV. 42. Leipzig: W. Engelmann.Google Scholar
- Ling Ping-Ping: 1981. Stomatal studies in Chinese Taccaceae with a discussion on its taxonomical significance. Bull. Nanjing Bot. Gard. Mem. Sun Yat Sen 1981: 20–24.Google Scholar
- Rao, V.S.: 1969. The vascular anatomy of Tacca pinnatifida. J. Univ. Bombey 38. 65: 18–24.Google Scholar
- Saw, L.G.: 1993. Tacca: flowering and fruiting behaviour. Nat. Malaysiana 18: 3–6.Google Scholar
- Takhtajan, A.L.: 1982. See general references.Google Scholar
- Zavada, M.S.: 1983. Comparative morphology of monocot pollen and evolutionary trends of apertures and pollen wall structures. Bot. Rev. 49: 331–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar