Commelinaceae

  • R. B. Faden
Chapter
Part of the The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants book series (FAMILIES GENERA, volume 4)

Abstract

Perennial or occasionally annual, terrestrial, or rarely epiphytic, monoecious, or andromonoecious, rarely polygamomonoecious, small to large herbs, with erect to ascending, diffusely spreading or stoloniferous, occasionally rhizomatous, rarely scandent shoots. Roots fibrous or tuberous. Leaves sheathing the stem at the base, alternate or in pseudowhorls, spirally arranged or distichous, sheaths closed, eligulate; lamina simple, entire, often narrowed into a false petiole, commonly somewhat succulent, ptyxis involute, less commonly convolute or supervolute. Inflorescences terminal or terminal and axillary, in some genera all axillary and perforating the sheaths, commonly a paniclelike thyrse composed of several to many helicoid, cymose branches (cincinni), sometimes reduced to a single cincinnus or, rarely, to a single flower, sometimes enclosed in or closely subtended by a leafy bract (spathe). Flowers actinomorphic or zygomorphic, usually bisexual or bisexual and male, rarely female and bisexual or female, bisexual and male, remaining open for only a few hours, then deliquescing. Nectaries lacking. Calyx composed of 3, equal or unequal, free or partly fused, sepaline or petaline sepals. Corolla composed of 3, equal to dimorphic, free or basally fused, white or colored petals. Androecium composed of 6 stamens arranged in 2 whorls, sometimes all fertile and equal or unequal, often 2–3(−4) reduced to staminodes, occasionally 1–3 (rarely all) lacking, staminodes either alternating with the stamens or else arranged on one side of the flower and the stamens on the other, filaments glabrous or some or all bearded, anthers dehiscing longitudinally, rarely poricidally. Ovary superior, bi- or trilocular, locules equal or dorsal locule reduced, ovules uniseriate or biseriate, 1-many per locule. Style terminal on ovary, simple, usually slender, stigma terminal, simple, small, or enlarged. Fruit a dehiscent or rarely indehiscent capsule, berry-like indehiscent capsule, or berry. Seeds with an embryotega or operculum covering the embryo, hilum dorsal, lateral, semilateral, or terminal.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Selected Bibliography

  1. Brenan, J.P.M. 1966. The classification of Commelinaceae. J. Linn Soc. Bot. 59: 349–370.Google Scholar
  2. Bruckner, G. 1926. Beiträge zur Anatomie, Morphologie und Systematik der Commelinaceae. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 61, Beibl. 137: 1–70.Google Scholar
  3. Bruckner, G. 1930. Commelinaceae. In: Engler, A. (ed.) Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, 2nd edn, 15a. W. Engelmann Leipzig, pp. 159–181.Google Scholar
  4. Chase, M.W. et al. 1993. See general references.Google Scholar
  5. Chase, M.W. et al. 1995. See general references.Google Scholar
  6. Chase, M.W. et al. 1995a. See general references.Google Scholar
  7. Clarke, C.B. 1881. Commelinaceae. In: De Candolle, A., De Candolle, C. (eds.) Monographiae Phanerogamarum, T. 3, pp. 113–324. Paris: G. Masson.Google Scholar
  8. Dahlgren, R.M.T., Clifford, H.T. 1982. See general references. Dahlgren, R.M.T., Clifford, H.T., Yeo, P.F. 1985. See general references.Google Scholar
  9. Duvall, M.R., Clegg, M.T., Chase, M.W., Clark, W.D., Kress, W.J., Hills, H.G., Eguiarte, L.E., Smith, J.F., Gaut, B.S., Zimmer, E.A., Learn, G.H. Jr. 1993. Phylogenetic hypotheses for the monocotyledons constructed from rbcL sequence data. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 80: 607–619.Google Scholar
  10. Evans, T.M. 1995. A phylogenetic analysis of the Commelinaceae based on morphological and molecular data. Ph D Dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar
  11. Faden, R.B. 1983. Isolating mechanisms among five sympatric species of Aneilema R. Br. ( Commelinaceae) in Kenya. Bothalia 14: 907–1002.Google Scholar
  12. Faden, R.B. 1985. Commelinaceae. In: Dahlgren, R.M.T., Clifford, H.T., Yeo, P.F. (eds.) The families of monocotyledons. pp. 381–387. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  13. Faden, R.B. 1988a. Vegetative and reproductive features of forest and nonforest genera of African Commelinaceae. Monogr. Syst. Bot. Mo. Bot. Gard. 25: 521–526.Google Scholar
  14. Faden, R.B. 1988b. Reproductive biology of Palisota Reichb., an African endemic genus of Commelinaceae. Abstract, AETFAT, 12th Plenary Meeting, 4–10 September 1988, Hamburg, p. 58.Google Scholar
  15. Faden, R.B. 1991. The morphology and taxonomy of Aneilema R. Brown (Commelinaceae). Smithson. Contrib. Bot. 76: 1166.Google Scholar
  16. Faden, R.B. 1992. Floral attraction and floral hairs in the Commelinaceae. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 79: 46–52.Google Scholar
  17. Faden, R.B. 1993. Murdannia cryptantha ( Commelinaceae), a new species with cleistogamous flowers from Australia and Papua New Guinea. Novon 3: 133–136.Google Scholar
  18. Faden, R.B. 1995. Commelinaceae. In: Thulin, M. (ed.) Flora of Somalia, Vol. 4, pp. 79–94. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.Google Scholar
  19. Faden, R.B., Hunt, D.R. 1991. The classification of the Commelinaceae. Taxon 40: 19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Faden, R.B., Suda, Y. 1980. Cytotaxonomy of Commelinaceae: chromosome numbers of some African and Asiatic species. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 81: 301–325.Google Scholar
  21. Grootjen, C.J. 1983. Development of ovule and seed in Cartonema spicatum R. Br. (Cartonemataceae). Aust. J. Bot. 31: 297–305.Google Scholar
  22. Grootjen, C.J., Bouman, F. 1981. Development of ovule and seed in Stanfieldiella imperforata (Commelinaceae). Acta. Bot. Neerl. 30: 265–275.Google Scholar
  23. Hamann, U. 1961. Merkmalsbestand und Verwandtschaftbeziehungen der Farinosae. Ein Beitrag zum System der Monokotyledonen. Willdenowia 2: 639–768.Google Scholar
  24. Hamann, U. 1962. Weiteres über Merkmalsbestand und Verwandtschaftsbeziehungen der Farinosae. Willdenowia 3: 169–207.Google Scholar
  25. Handlos, W.L. 1975. The taxonomy of Tripogandra ( Commelinaceae ). Rhodora 77: 213–333.Google Scholar
  26. Harris, P.J., Hartley, R.D. 1980. See general references.Google Scholar
  27. Hasskarl, J.K. 1870. Commelinaceae Indicae, Imprimis Archipelagi Indica. Wien: M. Slazer.Google Scholar
  28. Hegnauer, R. 1963, 1986. See general references.Google Scholar
  29. Jones, K. 1974. Chromosome evolution by Robertsonian translocation in Gibasis ( Commelinaceae ). Chromosoma (Berl.) 45: 353–368.Google Scholar
  30. Jones, K. 1990. Robertsonian change in allies of Zebrina (Commelinaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 172: 263–271.Google Scholar
  31. Jones, K., Jopling, C. 1972. Chromosomes and the classification of the Commelinaceae. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 64: 129–162.Google Scholar
  32. Jones, K., Kenton, A., Hunt, D.R. 1981. Contributions to the cytotaxonomy of the Commelinaceae. Chromosome evolution in Tradescantia section Cymbispatha. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 83: 157–188.Google Scholar
  33. Kellogg, E.A., Linder, H.P. 1995. Phylogeny of Poales. In: Rudall, P.J., Cribb, P.J., Cutler, D.F., Humphries, C.J. (eds.) Monocotyledons: systematics and eolution. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, pp. 511–542.Google Scholar
  34. Lee, R.E. 1961. Pollen dimorphism in Tripogandra grandi-flora. Baileya 9: 53–56.Google Scholar
  35. Meisner, C.F. 1842. CCLXI Commelinaceae. In: Plantarum Vascularium Genera, Vol. 1. Leipzig: Weidmann, pp. 406–407.Google Scholar
  36. Ornduff, R. 1974. Heterostyly in South African plants: a conspectus. J. S. Afr. Bot. 40: 169–187.Google Scholar
  37. Owens, S.J. 1981. Self-incompatibility in the Commelinaceae. Ann. Bot 47: 567–581.Google Scholar
  38. Owens, S.J., Kimmins, F.M. 1981. Stigma morphology in Commelinaceae. Ann. Bot. 47: 771–783.Google Scholar
  39. Pichon, M. 1946. Sur les commélinacées. Not. Syst. ( Paris ) 12: 217–242.Google Scholar
  40. Poole, M.M., Hunt, D.R. 1980. Pollen morphology and the taxonomy of the Commelinaceae: an exploratory survey. American Commelinaceae: VIII. Kew Bull. 34: 639–660.Google Scholar
  41. Rohweder, O. 1956. Die Farinosae in der Vegetation von El Salvador. Abh. Auslandsk. 61 Reihe C Naturwiss. 18: 1197.Google Scholar
  42. Rohweder, O. 1963. Anatomische und histogenetische Untersuchungen an Laubsprossen und Blüten der Commelinaceen. Bot. Jahrb. 82: 1–99.Google Scholar
  43. Sigrist, M.R., Sazima, M. 1991. Biologia floral and polinizaçäo por vibraçäo em duas espécies simpâtricas de Dichorisandra (Commelinaceae). In: Resumos, 42nd Congr. Nacl. de Botânica Goiana, 20–26Google Scholar
  44. Janeiro 1991, Universidade Federal de Goias, Sociedade Botânica do Brasil, Goiânia, p. 484.Google Scholar
  45. Simpson, B.B., Neff, J.L., Dieringer, G. 1986. Reproductive biology of Tinantia anomala (Commelinaceae). Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 113: 149–158.Google Scholar
  46. Stevenson, D.W., Loconte, H. 1995. Cladistic analysis of monocot families. In: Rudall, P.J., Cribb, P.J., Cutler, D.F., Humphries, C.J. (eds.) Monocotyledons: systematics nd evolution. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, pp. 543–578.Google Scholar
  47. Takhtajan, A.L. (ed.) 1985. Comparative anatomy of the seeds, Vol. 1: Monocotyledons. Leningrad: Nauka Press.Google Scholar
  48. Tillich, H.-J. 1995. Seedlings and systematics in monocotyledons. In: Rudall, P.J., Cribb, P.J., Cutler, D.F., Humphries, C.J. (eds.) Monocotyledons: systematics and evolution. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, pp. 303–352.Google Scholar
  49. Tomlinson, P.B. 1966. Anatomical data in the classification of Commelinaceae. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 59: 371–395.Google Scholar
  50. Tomlinson, P.B. 1969. Commelinales-Zingiberales. In: Metcalfe, C.R. (ed.) Anatomy of the monocotyledons, Vol. III. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 1–446.Google Scholar
  51. Troll, W. 1961. Cochliostema odoratissimum Lem. Organisation und Lebenweise nebst vergleichenden Ausblicken auf andere Commelinaceen. Beitr. Biol. Pflanz. 36: 325389.Google Scholar
  52. Uphof, J.C.T. 1934. Vergleichende blütenmorphologische und blütenbiologische Studien an Commelina virginica L. Ber. Dtsch. Bot. Ges. 52: 173–180.Google Scholar
  53. Vogel, S. 1978. Evolutionary shifts from reward to deception in pollen flowers. In: Richards, A.J. (ed.) The Pollination of flowers by insects. Linnean Society Symposium Series No 6. New York: Academic Press, pp. 89–104.Google Scholar
  54. Woodson, R.E. 1942. Commentary on the North American genera of Commelinaceae. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 29: 141154.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. B. Faden

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations