Sampling, Sample Preparation and Preservation
Abstract
Proper collection and handling of water samples is an essential part of producing meaningful analytical results, especially at the trace levels now reported. Aspects which must be considered include sample size and container, sample labels, sampling technique, sample preservation from time of collection until receipt by the laboratory, transport and storage of samples, and recordkeeping. The characteristics of the agricultural chemical to be analyzed, study objectives and design, and the nature of the water to be sampled are important factors in determining how each of this aspects should be addressed. For many agricultural chemicals, requirements for sample containers and sampling techniques can be simplified compared to those often used in other types of groundwater monitoring programs. Regardless of the specific procedures utilized, the challenge of collecting water samples in an environment where dust and surface soils may contain residues three to four orders of magnitude higher than the sensitivity of the analytical method dictates that samples always be collected by conscientious and trained personnel. Care must always be taken to avoid contamination by attention to cleanliness of the sampler, sample bottles, sampling equipment, and storage containers. Samples (or empty sample bottles) should not be transported in vehicles also used to transport agricultural chemicals or stored in containers or freezers previously containing agricultural chemicals. Sample labels and study records must be adequate to provide necessary information and fulfil any applicable regulatory requirements.
Keywords
Water Table Agricultural Chemical Sampling Equipment Applicable Regulatory Requirement Proper CollectionPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Nicholson HP, Grzenda AR, Lauer GJ, Cox WS, Teasley JI (1964) Limnol Ocean 9: 310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Department of the environment (1991) Drinking water 1990, A report by the chief inspector, Drinking water inspectorate. HMSO, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 3.Holden PW (1986) Pesticides and groundwater quality, Issues and problems in four states. National Academy Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- 4.Leistra M, Boesten JJTI (1989) Agric. Ecosystems Environ. 26: 369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Leonard RA (1990) In: Cheng HH (ed) Pesticides in the soil environment: Processes, impacts, and modeling. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, p 303 (SSSA Book Series 2)Google Scholar
- 6.Jones, RL (1994) In: Honeycutt RC Schabacker D, (eds) Mechanisms of pesticide movement into ground water. Lewis, Ann Arbor, MI p 125Google Scholar
- 7.Wauchope RD, Decoursey DG (1986) In: Camper ND (ed) Research methods in weed science, 3rd edn. Southern Weed Science Society, p 135Google Scholar
- 8.Jones RL, Norris FA (1991) In: Nash RG, Leslie, AR (eds) Groundwater residue sampling design. American Chemical Society, Washington, p 165 ( ACS Symp. Ser. 465 )Google Scholar
- 9.Kirkland SD, Jones RL, Norris FA (1991) In: Nash RG, Leslie AR (eds) Groundwater residue sampling design. American Chemical Society, Washington, p 214 ( ACS Symp. Ser. 465 )Google Scholar
- 10.Simmons ND (1991) In: Brighton crop protection conference weeds-1991, proceedings, vol. 3. p 1259Google Scholar
- 11.Robin MJL, Gilham RW (1987) Ground Water Monit Rev 7: 85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Barker JF, Dickhout R (1988) Ground Water Monit Rev 8: 112CrossRefGoogle Scholar