Determination of Mechanical Stress by Polarized Shear Waves

  • E. Schneider
  • K. Goebbels

Abstract

The determination of mechanical stress by ultrasonic techniques is based on the measurement of sound velocity which is influenced by stress. The physical background of this phenomenon is known since a long time, but the practical realization until now failed due to two reasons:
  • The influence of stress on the ultrasonic velocity is rather small, typically of the order of 10–3. Therefore, in order to determine the velocity, the pathlength and the time-of-flight have to be measured accurately. Whereas time-of-flight measurements with high precision can be easily achieved, it is difficult and time-consuming to obtain the same precision in measuring the pathlength.

  • Texture and microstructure also influence the sound velocity and hence these effects must be separated for the determination of stress. The first mentioned problem is solved by measuring the times-of-flight of two linearly polarized shear waves relative to each other. These two waves propagate along the same pathlength and from the theory of elasticity it follows that a stress determination is possible without accurate pathlength measurements.

Keywords

Residual Stress Shear Wave Sound Velocity Compressive Residual Stress Ultrasonic Velocity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Murnaghan, F.D.: Finite Deformation of an Elastic Solid. New York: Wiley 1951.MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hughes, D.S.; Kelly, J.L.: Second-Order Elastic Deformation of Solids. Phys. Rev 92 (1953) 1145–1149.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schneider, E.; Goebbels, K.: Determination of Residual Stress by Time-of-Flight Measurements with Linear-Polarized Shear Waves. Ultrasonics Symposium IEEE (1981) 95 6–959.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schneider, E.; Goebbels, K.: Zerstörungsfreie Bestimmung von (Eigen-)Spannungen mit linear-polarisierten Ultraschallwellen. VDI-Berichte Nr. 439 (1982) 91–96.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Granato, A.; Lücke, K.: Theory of Mechanical Damping Due to Dislocations. J. Appl. Phys. 27 (1956) 6, 583–593.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hikata, A.; Truell, R.: Frequency Dependence of Ultrasonic Attenuation and Velocity on Plastic Deformation. J. Appl. Phys. 28 (1957) 5, 522– 523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Granato, A.; Hikata, A.; Lücke, K.: Recovery of Damping and Modulus Changes Following Plastic Deformation. Acta Met. 6 (1958) 470–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. Schneider
    • 1
  • K. Goebbels
    • 1
  1. 1.Fraunhofer-Institut für zerstörungsfreie PrüfverfahrenSaarbrücken 11Germany

Personalised recommendations