Advertisement

Fault Tolerance Time Interval

How to define and handle
  • Thomas FreseEmail author
  • Torsten Leonhardt
  • Denis Hatebur
  • Isabelle Côté
  • Hans-Jörg Aryus
  • Maritta Heisel
Chapter
  • 373 Downloads

Zusammenfassung

The Fault Tolerant Time Interval (FTTI) is a relevant part of ISO 26262 and other Functional Safety standards, however not satisfactorily defined or guided by the standards themselves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. [1].
    International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Road Vehicles – Functional Safety, ISO 26262, 2011.Google Scholar
  2. [2].
    International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Road Vehicles – Functional Safety, ISO 26262, 2018.Google Scholar
  3. [3].
    International Electromechanical Commission (IEC), Functional safety of electrical/electronic/programmable electronic safety-relevant systems, IEC 61508, 2000.Google Scholar
  4. [4].
    K. Beckers, I. Côté, T. Frese, D. Hatebur, M. Heisel, Systematic Derivation of Functional Safety Requirements for Automotive Systems, in: Proceedings of SAFECOMP, LNCS 8666, Springer, 65–80, 2014.Google Scholar
  5. [5].
    K. Beckers, I. Côté, T. Frese, D. Hatebur, M. Heisel, A Structured and Systematic Model-based Development Method for Automotive Systems, considering the OEM/Supplier Interface in: Reliability Engineering & System Safety, Vol 158, 172 – 184, 2017Google Scholar
  6. [6].
    A. Nardi, A. Armato, Functional Safety Methodologies for Automotive Applications, Pages 970–975 in: Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Computer-Aided Design, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2017Google Scholar
  7. [7].
  8. [8].
    H. Martin, K. Tschabuschnig, O. Bridal, D. Watzenig, Functional Safety of Automated Driving Systems: Does ISO 26262 Meet the Challenges?, Pages 387–416 in: Automated Driving: Safer and More Efficient Future Driving, Springer, Cham, 2017Google Scholar
  9. [9].
    A. Schnellenbach, Fail-operational automotive systems, TU Graz, November 2016Google Scholar
  10. [10].
    D. Denomme, S. Hooson, J. Winkelman, A Fault Tolerant Time Interval Process for Functional Safety Development, SAE, 2019Google Scholar
  11. [11].
    R. Gulati, V. Easwaran, P. Karandikar, M. Mody, P. Shankar, Resolving ADAS imaging subsystem functional safety quagmire, in: IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE), 2015Google Scholar
  12. [12].
    A. Knapp. M. Ott, Ein Ansatz zur Ableitung von Timing Anforderungen aus den Fehlertoleranzzeiten des Systems, Talk on Safetronic 2018Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas Frese
    • 1
    Email author
  • Torsten Leonhardt
    • 1
  • Denis Hatebur
    • 2
  • Isabelle Côté
    • 3
  • Hans-Jörg Aryus
    • 4
  • Maritta Heisel
    • 2
  1. 1.Ford-Werke GmbHKölnDeutschland
  2. 2.Universität Duisburg-EssenDuisburgDeutschland
  3. 3.ITESYS Inst. f. tech. Sys. GmbHDortmundDeutschland
  4. 4.SystemA Engineering Gesellschaft für Systemanalyse mbHImmenstaad am BodenseeDeutschland

Personalised recommendations