Pluralism, socioeconomics and de-coloniality

Notes from a recent Argentine experience
  • Leandro Marcelo BonaEmail author
Part of the Sozioökonomische Bildung und Wissenschaft book series (SOBIWI)


It is a well-known fact that the neoclassical school of thought dominates economic teaching. In order to provide alternatives, develop a pluralistic approach towards the teaching of economics and integrate the social and political dimensions of an economy, this paper offers some teaching tools incorporating such a pluralistic approach. The methodology is based on induction, through the experiences during the courses taught at secondary school and university degree levels. The study attempts to answer the following questions: How to start a course with a pluralistic approach in economics? What type of bibliography is relevant? What group practices are more stimulating? What complementary resources (e. g. films, videos, lectures etc.) can generate interest among students? Some of the main findings of this paper are: 1) it is fundamental to begin by surveying students’ interests; 2) it is better to resort to original authors (such as Smith, Ricardo, Marx, Marshall, Schumpeter, and Keynes) than to the textbooks; 3) programmed debates stimulate interest while suggesting alternative ways of thinking, such as role-play (different actors involved in a public policy, economists with different views on the same problem); 4) in addition to the written tests, students should be encouraged to produce knowledge through papers and essays on topics of their interest on a range of socioeconomic issues; 5) interviews and field visits broaden the perspective of students and show them that economic analysis is not simply circumscribed to academics; 6) movies are an excellent resource to address issues such as finance, crisis, labour market, international trade, core-periphery economies, among others; 7) socioeconomics, de-coloniality and pluralism are fundamental in order to provide a democratic approach.


Teaching economics de-coloniality socio-economics critical thinking pluralist teaching teaching resources 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Acemoglu, D. and Robinson, J. (2012). Why Nations Fall? The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. Chicago: Crown Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  2. Barrera, F. (2011) De mitos vive la ortodoxia. Relato de una experiencia de enseñanza de economía crítica. In Actas de III Jornadas sobre Enseñanza de la Economía, Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento (UNGS), Buenos Aires, octubre.Google Scholar
  3. Barrera, F. (2013). Desmitificar la enseñanza de la economía en Argentina. RELACSO. Revista Estudiantil Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, 3 (1), 1–21.Google Scholar
  4. Bartlett, R. (2012). Integrating race, gender and class. In Hoyt, G. and McGoldrick, K. (ed.), International Handbook on Teaching and Learning Economics (pp. 213–222). Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  5. Basualdo, E. (comp.), Barrera, M., Bona, L., González, M., Manzanelli, P. and Wainer, A. (2017). Endeudar y Fugar. Un análisis de la historia económica argentina de Martínez de Hoz a Macri. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI editors.Google Scholar
  6. Becker, W. and Watts, M. (1996). Chalk and Talk: A National Survey on Teaching Undergraduate Economics. American Economic Review, 86 (2), 344–349.Google Scholar
  7. Becker, W. and Watts, M. (2000). Teaching Economics in the 21st Century. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14 (1), 109–119.Google Scholar
  8. Becker, W. and Watts, M. (2001). Teaching Economics at the Start of the 21st Century: Still Chalk-and-Talk. American Economic Review, 91 (2), 446–451.Google Scholar
  9. Beckman, M. and Stirling, K. (2000). Promoting Critical Thinking in Economics Education. Retrieved from
  10. Bhaduri, A. (1999). Macroeconomics. The Dynamics of Commodity Production. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  11. Bona, L. (2016). Subdesarrollo y excedente económico. Una conexión posible entre los aportes de Paul Baran y Celso Furtado. Cuadernos de Economía Crítica, 2 (4), 95–120.Google Scholar
  12. Brinia, V., Panagiota, K. and Stavrakouli, K. (2016). A New Teaching Method for Teaching Economics in Secondary Education. Journal of Research and Method in Education, 6 (2), 86–93.Google Scholar
  13. Brookfield, S. (1987). Developing critical thinkers: Challenging adults to explore alternative ways of thinking and acting. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  14. Bourdieu, P. (2011). Les structures sociales en économie. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
  15. Bowles, S., Edwards, R. and Roosevelt (2005). Understanding capitalism: competition, comend and change. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Buraschi, S. and others (2015). La formación de los economistas en Argentina y Uruguay: la distribución de la carga horaria por áreas temáticas en nuestros planes de estudio. Cuadernos de Economía Crítica, 2 (3), 155–164.Google Scholar
  17. Cardoso, F. and Faletto, E. (2006). Dominación y dependencia en América Latina. Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
  18. Carrasco, C. et al. (2018). Economía Feminista. Desafíos, propuestas, alianzas. Buenos Aires: Madreselva.Google Scholar
  19. Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo de la Educación-CIDE (1990). Técnicas participativas para la educación popular. Santiago de Chile: CIDE.Google Scholar
  20. Coraggio, J. (2007). Introducción. In Coraggio, J. (Org.). La Economía Social desde la Periferia: contribuciones latinoamericanas. Colección de lecturas de economía social (pp. 17-58). Buenos Aires: UNGS-Altamira Ed.Google Scholar
  21. De Loach, S. (2012). What every economist should know about the evaluation of teaching: a review of the literature. In Hoyt, G. and McGoldrick, K. (ed.). International Handbook on Teaching and Learning Economics (pp. 363–372). Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  22. De Santis, G., Naclerio, A. and Narodowsky, P. (2007). Pensar y hacer Macroeconomia. La Plata: Ediciones de la UNLP.Google Scholar
  23. Dobb, M. (1973). Theories of Value and Distribution since Adam Smith. Cambrigde: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Dornbusch, R. and Fischer, S. (1994). Macroeconomía. Madrid: MacGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  25. Edwards, R. and Mac Ewan, A. (2015) La enseñanza de la economía. Un enfoque crítico de la economía: bases para un nuevo currículum. Cuadernos de Economía Crítica, 2 (3), 17–47.Google Scholar
  26. Emami, Z. and Davis, J. (2009). Democracy, Education and Economics. International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education, 1/2, 37–45.Google Scholar
  27. Farías, C. and Balardini, F. (2018). Teaching social economics: Bringing the real world into the classroom and taking the classroom into the real world. International Journal of Social Economics,
  28. Fernández Retamar, R. (2006). Pensamiento de nuestra América. Autorreflexiones y propuestas. Buenos Aires: Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales (CLACSO).Google Scholar
  29. Forcinito, K. (2010). La enseñanza de la economía por paradigmas y en interdisciplinariedad con el resto de las ciencias sociales. Reflexiones acerca de los desafíos involucrados en la práctica docente y el proceso de aprendizaje. In Wainer, V. and Maza, G. (ed.), Primera Jornada de Enseñanza de la Economía (pp. 7–21). Malvinas Argentinas: UNGS.Google Scholar
  30. Freire, P. (2008). Pedagogía del oprimido. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI editors.Google Scholar
  31. Furtado, C. (1978). Prefacio para una nueva economía política. Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
  32. Garnett, R., Reardon, J. and Reardon, J. (2012). Pluralism in economics education. In Hoyt, G. and McGoldrick, K. (ed.). International Handbook on Teaching and Learning Economics (pp. 242–249). Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  33. Goldsmith, A. and Casey, J. (2012). The interdisciplinary approach to teaching economics. In Hoyt, G. and McGoldrick, K. (ed.), International Handbook on Teaching and Learning Economics (pp. 234–241). Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  34. Granovetter, M. (1974). Getting a job: A study of contacts and careers. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  35. Grosfoguel, R. (2006). La descolonización de la economía política y los estudios poscoloniales: Trasmodernidad, pensamiento fronterizo y colonialidad global. Tabula Rasa, 4 (1), 18–48.Google Scholar
  36. Harvey, D. (2005). A Brief History of Neoliberalism. London: Oxford.Google Scholar
  37. Hoyt, G. and McGoldrick, K. (ed.) (2012). International Handbook on Teaching and Learning Economics. Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  38. Institute for New Economic Thinking (2018). Retrieved from
  39. International Journal of Pluralism and Economic’s Education (2019). Retrieved from
  40. Lander, E. (ed.) (2000). Colonialidad del saber. Eurocentrismo y ciencias sociales. Buenos Aires: Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales (CLACSO).Google Scholar
  41. Maden, K. and Dimand, R. (ed.) (2018). The Routledge Handbook of the History of Women’s Economic Thought. London and New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  42. Miguez, P. and Santarcangelo, J. (2010). La economía a la luz de la economía política. Wainer, V. and Maza, G.(ed.), Primera Jornada de Enseñanza de la Economía. Malvinas Argentinas: UNGS.Google Scholar
  43. Noyola Vázquez, J. (2009). El desarrollo económico y la inflación en México y otros países latinoamericanos. Ola financiera, 2 (3), 161–177.Google Scholar
  44. Pérez Orozco, A. (2014). Subversión feminista de la economía: aportes para un debate sobre el conflicto capital-vida. Madrid: Traficantes de sueños.Google Scholar
  45. Polanyi, K. (2001). The Great Transformation. The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  46. Portelli, H. (2011). Gramsci y el bloque histórico. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI editors.Google Scholar
  47. Prebisch, R. (1981): Capitalismo periférico: crisis y transformación. Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
  48. Prieto Puga Farina, R. (2013). Enseñar economía para formar conciencies cívicas y críticas. La crisis en el aula. Investigación en la escuela (IES Santiago de Compostela), 81, 57–99.Google Scholar
  49. Quijano, A. (2014). Colonialidad del poder, eurocentrismo y América Latina. In Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales, Cuestiones y horizontes: de la dependencia histórico-estructural a la colonialidad/descolonialidad del poder. Buenos Aires: Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales (CLACSO).Google Scholar
  50. Reteaching Economics (2018). Retrieved from
  51. Rethinking Economics (2018). Manifesto for Curriculum Reform. Retrieved from
  52. Revista de Economía Crítica (2019). Quiénes somos. Retrieved from
  53. Ricardo, D. (2001): On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. London: Batouche Books.Google Scholar
  54. Robin, M. (2008). Le Monde selon Monsanto. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
  55. Ruiz Valiente, R. (2006). Principales doctrinas del pensamiento económico. La Habana: Ediciones de la Universidad.Google Scholar
  56. Screpanti, E. and Zamagni, S. (1997). Panorama de historia del pensamiento económico. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
  57. SEC – Sociedad de Economía Crítica (2010). Documento sobre Planes de Estudio. Retrieved from
  58. SEC – Sociedad de Economía Crítica (2014). Cuadernos de Economía Crítica 1 (1), 1–158.Google Scholar
  59. Steiner P. (2004). La sociologie économique. Repères: La Découverte.Google Scholar
  60. Tran, L. and Cahen-Fourot, L. (2015). From Terrible to Terrific Undergraduate Economics Curricula. Retrieved from
  61. Wullweber, J. (2018). Monism vs. pluralism, the global financial crisis, and the methodological struggle in the field of International Political Economy. Competition and Change, 23 (3), 287–311.Google Scholar
  62. Yumatle, C. (2015). Pluralism. In Gibbons, M. (ed.) The Encyclopedia of Political Thought. Harvard: Wiley & Sons.

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Buenos AiresArgentinien

Personalised recommendations