Skip to main content

Zukunft der Aus- und Weiterbildung in der Markt- und Sozialforschung

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Marktforschung für die Smart Data World

Zusammenfassung

Die Nachfrage nach gut ausgebildeten DatenwissenschaftlerInnen, die sowohl die Fähigkeiten besitzen, Daten auf „traditionellem Weg“ zu erheben und auszuwerten und ebenso mit großen semi- oder gar unstrukturierten Datensätzen zu arbeiten, steigt kontinuierlich an. In diesem Beitrag beschreiben wir, welche Kompetenzen Sozial- und MarktforscherInnen heutzutage benötigen, um am Arbeitsmarkt erfolgreich zu sein. Wir diskutieren Herausforderungen und Chancen im Bereich der Lehre dieser neuen Inhalte und deren Potenzial, den steigenden Bedarf an Fachkräften im Bereich Datenerhebung und Datenanalyse in den kommenden Jahren zu decken.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • ADM (2019) Die Marktforschung in Zahlen. https://www.adm-ev.de/die-branche/mafo-zahlen/. Zugegriffen: 3. Juni 2019

  • Antoun C, Katz J, Argueta J, Wang L (2018) Design heuristics for effective smartphone questionnaires. Soc Sci Comput Rev 36:557–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beyer MA, Laney D (2012) The importance of “Big Data”: a definition. Gartner, Stamford

    Google Scholar 

  • Brick JM (2011) The future of survey sampling. Public Opin Q 75:872–888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calderwood L, Lessof C (2009) Enhancing longitudinal surveys by linking to administrative data. In: Lynn P (Hrsg) Methodology of longitudinal surveys. Wiley, Chichester, S 55–72

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Callegaro M, Yang Y (2018) The role of surveys in the era of “Big Data”. In: Vannette D, Krosnick J (Hrsg) The Palgrave handbook of survey research. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, S 175–192

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Capgemini (2017) Studie IT-Trends 2017. Überfordert Digitalisierung etablierte Unternehmensstrukturen? https://www.capgemini.com/de-de/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2017/02/it-trends-studie-2017.pdf. Zugegriffen: 7. Juni 2019

  • Carpenter J, Kenward M (2012) Multiple imputation and its application. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Civey (2019) Erfahren Sie, was Deutschland denkt! https://civey.com/. Zugegriffen: 3. Juni 2019

  • Connelly R, Playford CJ, Gayle V, Dibben C (2016) The role of administrative data in the big data revolution in social science research. Soc Sci Res 59:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couper MP, Antoun C, Mavletova A (2017) Mobile web surveys: a total survey error perspective. In: Biemer PP et al (Hrsg) Total survey error in practice. Wiley, Hoboken, S 133–154

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ehlers U-D, Kellermann SA (2019) Future skills – the future of learning and higher education. Results of the International Future Skills Delphi Survey, Karlsruhe

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott MR, Valliant R (2017) Inference for nonprobability samples. Stat Sci 32:249–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat (2019) Digital economy and society: ICT usage in households and by individuals. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/digital-economy-and-society/data/database. Zugegriffen: 4. Juni 2019

  • Fellegi IP, Holt D (1976) A systematic approach to automatic edit and imputation. J Am Stat Assoc 71:17–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Few S (2012). Show me the numbers. Designing tables and graphs to enlighten. Analytics Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster I, Heus P (2016) Databases. In: Foster I, Ghani R, Jarmin RS, Kreuter F, Lane J (Hrsg) Big data and social science research: theory and practical approaches. Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton, S 93–124

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Geisen E, Romano Bergstrom J (2017) Usability testing for survey research. Morgan Kaufmann, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghani R, Schierholz M (2016) Machine learning. In: Foster I, Ghani R, Jarmin RS, Kreuter F, Lane J (Hrsg) Big data and social science research: theory and practical approaches. Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton, S 147–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Groen JA (2012) Sources of error in survey and administrative data: the importance of reporting procedures. J Off Stat 28:173–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Groves RM, Lyberg L (2010) Total survey error: past, present, and future. Public Opin Q 74:849–879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harms C, Schmidt S (2019) Marktforschung im Daten-Zeitalter: Software ist nur die halbe Miete. https://www.marktforschung.de/dossiers/themendossiers/plattformen-und-datensysteme-2019/dossier/marktforschung-im-daten-zeitalter-software-ist-nur-die-halbe-miete/. Zugegriffen: 7. Juni 2019

  • Japec L, Kreuter F, Berg M, Biemer P, Decker P, Lampe C, Lane J, O‘Neil C, Usher A (2015). Big data in survey research. AAPOR task force report. Public Opin Q 79:839–880

    Google Scholar 

  • Jünger J (2018) Mapping the field of automated data collection on the web: Collection approaches, data types, and research logic. In: Stutzer CM, Welker M, Egger M (Hrsg) Computational social science in the age of big data. Concepts, methodologies, tools, and application. Herbert van Halem, Köln, S 104–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Jungherr A (2016) Twitter use in election campaigns: a systematic literature review. J Inf Technol Polit 13:72–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klochikhin E, Boyd-Graber J (2016) Text analysis. In: Foster I, Ghani R, Jarmin RS, Kreuter F, Lane J (Hrsg) Big data and social science research: theory and practical approaches. Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, S 187–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler U (2016) Anforderungen an Hochschulabsolventen. In: König C, Stahl M, Wiegand E (Hrsg) Human resources. Springer, Wiesbaden, S 43–77

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kreuter F, Müller G, Trappmann M (2010) Nonresponse and measurement error in employment research: making use of administrative data. Public Opin Q 74:880–906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreuter F, Keusch F, Somailova E, Frößinger K (2018) International Program in Survey and Data Science. In: König C, Schröder J, Wiegand E (Hrsg) Big Data – Chancen, Risiken, Entwicklungstendenzen. Springer VS, Wiesbaden, S 27–41

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lane J, Stodden V, Bender S, Nissenbaum H (2014) Privacy, big data, and the public good: frameworks for engagement. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lazer D, Pentland A, Adamic L, Aral S, Barabási A-L, Brewer D, Christakis N et al (2009) Computational social science. Science 323(5915):721–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leek JT, Peng RD (2015) What is the question? Science 347(6228):1314–1315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchetti S, Giusti C, Pratesi M, Salvati N, Giannotti F, Pedreschi D, Salvatore R, Luca P, Gabrielli L (2015) Small area model-based estimators using big data sources. J Off Stat 31:263–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Munzert S, Rubba C, Meißner P, Nyhuis D (2014) Automated data collection with R: a practical guide to web scraping and text mining. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Neylon C (2016) Working with web data and APIs. In: Foster I, Ghani R, Jarmin RS, Kreuter F, Lane J (Hrsg) Big data and social science research: theory and practical approaches. Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton, S 23–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaumer Knaflic C (2015) Storytelling with data. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppeln-Bronikowski Sv (2018) Begrüßung durch die Direktorin beim Statistischen Bundesamt. In König C, Schröder J, Wiegand E (Hrsg) Big Data – Chancen, Risiken, Entwicklungstendenzen. Springer VS, Wiesbaden, S 9–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Pashler H, Wagenmakers EJ (2012) Editors’ introduction to the special section on replicability in psychological science: a crisis of confidence? Perspect Psychol Sci 7:528–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng R (2015) The reproducibility crisis in science: a statistical counterattack. Significance 12(3):30–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng RD, Matsui E (2015) The art of data science. A guide for anyone who works with data. Leanpub

    Google Scholar 

  • Penke M (2017) Marktforschungs-Startup Dalia bekommt sieben Millionen Dollar. https://www.gruenderszene.de/allgemein/marktforschung-dalia-research-investment. Zugegriffen: 3. Juni 2019

  • Perkel JM (2018) A toolkit for data transparency takes shape. Nature 560:513–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reich J, Ruipérez-Valiente JA (2019) The MOOC pivot. Science 363(6423):130–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rieder Y, Kühne S (2018) Geo-spatial analysis of social media data – a practical framework and applications using Twitter. In: Stutzer CM, Welker M, Egger M (Hrsg) Computational social science in the age of big data. Concepts, methodologies, tools, and application. Herbert van Halem, Köln, S 418–441

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakshaug J, Antoni M (2017) Errors in linking survey and administrative data. In: Biemer PP et al (Hrsg) Total survey error in practice. Wiley, Hoboken, S 557–573

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Samoilova E, Keusch F, Kreuter F (2018) Integrating survey and learning analytics data for a better understanding of engagement in MOOCs. In: Jiao H, Lissitz RW, Van Wie A (Hrsg) Data analytics and psychometrics: informing assessment practices. Information Age Publishing, Charlotte, S 247–261

    Google Scholar 

  • SAP News (2018). SAP SE to acquire Qualtrics International Inc., Sees experience management as the future of business [Press release]. https://news.sap.com/2018/11/sap-to-acquire-qualtrics-experience-management/. Zugegriffen: 7. Juni 2019

  • Schnell R (2018) ,Big Data‘ aus wissenschaftssoziologischer Sicht: Warum es kaum sozialwissenschaftliche Studien ohne Befragungen gibt. German Record Linkage Center Working Paper Series, No. WP-GRLC-2018-01

    Google Scholar 

  • Stier S, Breuer J, Siegers P, Thorson K (2019) Integrating survey data and digital trace data: key issues in developing an emerging field. Social Science Computer Review. Online first publiziert am 24. April 2019 auf https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439319843669

  • Stützer CM, Welker M, Egger M (2018) Computational social science in the age of big data. Herbert von Harlem, Köln

    Google Scholar 

  • Tokle J, Bender S (2016) Record linkage. In: Foster I, Ghani R, Jarmin RS, Kreuter F, Lane J (Hrsg) Big data and social science research: theory and practical approaches. Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton, S 71–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Usher A (2015) Skills required to integrate big data into public opinion research. Paper präsentiert auf der 70th Annual Conference of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Hollywood, Florida

    Google Scholar 

  • Vo H, Silver C (2016) Scaling up through parallel and distributed computing. In: Foster I, Ghani R, Jarmin RS, Kreuter F, Lane J (Hrsg) Big data and social science research: theory and practical approaches. Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton, S 125–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang W, Rothschild D, Goel S, Gelman A (2015) Forecasting elections with non-representative polls. Int J Forecast 31:980–991

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts DJ (2013) Computational social science: exciting progress and future directions. Bridge Front Eng 43(4):5–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiengarten L, Zwick M (2018) Integration neuer digitaler Datenquellen in der amtlichen Statistik. In: König C, Schröder J, Wiegand E (Hrsg) Big Data – Chancen, Risiken, Entwicklungstendenzen. Springer VS, Wiesbaden, S 43–60

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Willems K (2015) Choosing R or Python for data analysis? An infographic. [Blog post] https://www.datacamp.com/community/tutorials/r-or-python-for-data-analysis. Zugegriffen: 7. Juni 2019

  • Wissenschaftsrat (2019) Empfehlungen zu hochschulischer Weiterbildung als Teil des lebenslangen Lernens. Vierter Teil der Empfehlungen zur Qualifizierung von Fachkräften vor dem Hintergrund des demographischen Wandels. Drs. 7515-19. Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Yalcin MA, Plaisant C (2016) Information visualization. In: Foster I, Ghani R, Jarmin RS, Kreuter F, Lane J (Hrsg) Big data and social science research: theory and practical approaches. Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton, S 243–264

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Florian Keusch .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Keusch, F., Kreuter, F. (2020). Zukunft der Aus- und Weiterbildung in der Markt- und Sozialforschung. In: Keller, B., Klein, HW., Wachenfeld-Schell, A., Wirth, T. (eds) Marktforschung für die Smart Data World. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-28664-4_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-28664-4_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-28663-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-28664-4

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics