Advertisement

Toolbox for test planning and test realization of scenario-based field tests for automated and connected driving

  • Thomas OttoEmail author
  • Rico Auerswald
Conference paper
Part of the Proceedings book series (PROCEE)

Zusammenfassung

Current test and validation procedures for automated and connected driving functions use field tests on public roads primarily to identify unknown critical scenarios. These scenarios are then validated or varied within simulations or on closed proving grounds. In order to validate complex urban driving scenarios, this approach may need to be supplemented by the method of scenario-based field tests in real traffic environments. Scenario-based tests constitutes the methodical basis for an efficient and purposive test of automated and connected driving functions in public testbeds.

This paper focuses on concepts for the design, planning and implementation of scenario-based tests of automated and connected driving functions under real traffic conditions. The developed toolbox will be explained using the example of the “Digital Testbed Dresden / Saxony” as part of the initiative “Synchrone Mobilität 2023”.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. [1].
    J. Krimmling: “Das Dresdner Verkehrsmanagementsystem VAMOS,” in Verkehrsmanagementzentralen in Kommunen: Eine vergleichende Darstellung, M. Sandrock and G. Riegelhuth, Eds. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 2014, pp. 157–197.Google Scholar
  2. [2].
    https://www.asam.net/standards/detail/opendrive/ (as consulted online on 11.02.2019)
  3. [3].
    https://www.asam.net/standards/detail/openscenario/(as consulted online on 11.02.2019)
  4. [4].
    Steimle, Markus; Bagschik, Gerrit; Menzel, Till; Timo Wendler, Jan; Maurer, Markus: „Ein Beitrag zur Terminologie für den szenarienbasierten Testansatz automatisierter Fahrfunktionen.“ AAET 2018 – Automatisiertes und vernetztes Fahren, 14. bis 15. März 2018, BraunschweigGoogle Scholar
  5. [5].
    Groh, Korbinian; Kuehbeck, Thomas; Fleischmann, Benjamin; Schiementz, Mark; Chibelushi, Claude: „Towards a Scenario-Based Assessment Method for Highly Automated Driving Functions”. In: 8th Conference on Driver Assistance, 22 – 23 November 2017, Munich, Germany.Google Scholar
  6. [6].
    Kloeppel, M., Grimm, J., Strobl, S., and Auerswald, R. (2019). Performance evaluation of GLOSA-algorithms under realistic traffic conditions using C2Icommunication. In Nathanail, E. G. and Karakikes, I. D., editors, Data Analytics: Paving the Way to Sustainable Urban Mobility. CSUM 2018, volume 879 of Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, pages 44–52, Cham. Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  7. [7].
    Heinz, Aaron; Wolfram Remlinger, Johann Schweiger: „Track- / Scenariobased Trajectory Generation for Testing Automated Driving Functions” 8. Tagung Fahrerassistenz, München, 22.-23.11.2017Google Scholar
  8. [8].
    Till Menzel; Gerrit Bagschik; Markus Maurer: “Scenarios for Development, Test and Validation of Automated Vehicle” IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, 2018Google Scholar
  9. [9].
    FOT-Net consortium, 2017, D5.4 Updated Version of the FESTA (Field opErational teSt supporT Action) Handbook, Version 6, http://wiki.fot-net.eu

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fraunhofer-Institut für Verkehrs- und Infrastruktursysteme IVIDresdenDeutschland

Personalised recommendations