Advertisement

Savegame pp 83-94 | Cite as

The Importance of Being Playful

Addiction Prevention in the Context of Online Gaming
  • Nadja SpringerEmail author
  • Nestor Kapusta
  • Nika Schoof
Chapter
Part of the Perspektiven der Game Studies book series (PEGAST)

Abstract

The current DSM-5 research diagnosis of Internet Gaming Disorder has led to a great number of publications, dealing with the importance of differentiating between normal, extensive and addictive gaming. Online cultures and online social relations have become more and more important for people of all ages and gaming is one of the most common leisure activities of all children and adolescents. How can we distinguish healthy gaming from pathological gaming respecting individual differences and still define the right moment for interventions if they are needed in terms of either prevention or treatment for individuals with internet gaming disorder? Results from our SEYLA (Saving and Empowering Young Lives in Austria)-Study, where baseline data from school-aged adolescents (14–20 years old) has been collected regarding health and well-being in Austrian adolescents indicate that we do not need to prevent children and adolescents from gaming in order to prevent addiction. Instead, we need to support them so that they can play for fun and not as a mechanism to avoid or cope with other problems. Further research from a multiprofessional approach is needed to build a realistic and comprehensive understanding of this ‘gaming-continuum’, because those gamers who experience addiction-related symptoms require professional support without being stigmatized.

Keywords

Excessive gaming Online gaming disorder Addiction prevention SEYLA MMORPGs Online activities Videogames 

Referenecs

  1. Austrian Federal Ministry of Health (BMG). 2015. The Austrian addiction prevention strategy. https://broschuerenservice.sozialministerium.at/Home/Download?publicationId=643.
  2. Bauernhofer, Kathrin, Ilona Papousek, Andreas Fink, Friedrich H. Unterrainer, und Elisabeth M. Weiss. 2016. Problematic internet use (PIN)–a review of assessment questionnaires and risk factors. Neuropsychiatrie 30 (1): 2–9.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40211-015-0169-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carr, Nicholas. 2010. Wer bin ich, wenn ich online bin…: und was macht mein Gehirn solange? Munich: Blessing.Google Scholar
  4. Cole, Helena, and Mark D. Griffiths. 2007. Social interactions in massively multiplayer online role-playing gamers. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10 (4).  https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.9988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Deleuze, Jory, Jiang Long, Tie-Qiao Liu, Pierre Maurage, and Joel Billieux. 2018. Passion or addiction? Correlates of healthy versus problematic use of videogames in a sample of French-speaking regular players. Addicitve Behaviors 82:114–121.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.02.031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Faust, Kylie A., and Judith J. Prochaska. 2018. Internet gaming disorder: A sign of the times, or time for our attention? Addictive Behaviors 77:272–274.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.07.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fuchs, Martin, David Riedl, Astrid Bock, Gerhard Rumpold and Kathrin Sevecke. 2018. Pathological internet use – An important comorbidity in child and adolescent psychiatry: Prevalence and correlation patterns in a naturalistic sample of adolescent inpatients. BioMed Research International, Vol 2018, Article ID 1629147.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1629147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gentile, Douglas A., Hyekyung Choo, Albert Liau, Timothy Sim, Dongdong Li, Daniel Fung, and Angeline Khoo. 2011. Pathological Video Game use among youths: A two-year longitudinal study. Pediatrics 127 (2): 319–329.  https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-1353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gentile, Douglas A., Kira Bailey, Daphne Bavalier, Jeanne F. Brockmyer, Hilarie Cash, and Sarah Coyne M. et al. 2017. Internet gaming disorder in children and adolescents. Pediatrics 140 (S81).  https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-1758h.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Griffiths, Mark D. 2010. The role of context in online gaming excess and addiction: Some case study evidence. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction 8 (1): 119–125.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-009-9229-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Grusser, Sabine M., Ralf Thalemann, und Mark D. Griffiths. 2007. Excessive computer game playing: Evidence for addiction and aggression? Cyberpsychology and Behavior 10 (2): 290–292.  https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2006.9956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Király, Orsolya, Robert Urban, Mark D. Griffiths, Csilla Agoston, Katalin Nagygyorgy, Gyongyi Kokonyei, und Zsolt Demetrovics. 2015. The mediating effect of gaming motivation between psychiatric symptoms and problematic online gaming: An online survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research 17 (4): e88.  https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kuss, Daria J., Mark D. Griffiths, and Halley M. Pontes. 2017. DSM-5 diagnosis of internet gaming disorder: Some ways forward in overcoming issues and concerns in the gaming studies field. Journal of Behavioral Addictions 6 (2).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kühn, Simone, Tobias Gleich, Robert C. Lorenz, Ulman Lindenberger, und Jurgen Gallinat. 2014. Playing Super Mario induces structural brain plasticity: Gray matter changes resulting from training with a commercial Video Game. Molecular Psychiatry 19:265–271.  https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2013.120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Medienpädagogischer Forschungsverbund Südwest (Ed.). 2018. JIM-Studie 2018. Basisuntersuchung zum Medienumgang 12-19-Jähriger. mpfs. https://www.mpfs.de/fileadmin/files/Studien/JIM/2018/Studie/JIM_2018_Gesamt.pdf. Accessed 26 Nov 2018.
  16. Moggi, Franz, Hrsg. 2002. Doppeldiagnosen. Bern: Huber.Google Scholar
  17. Newzoo. 2019. Most popular core PC games | global. Newzoo. https://newzoo.com/insights/rankings/top-20-core-pc-games/. Accessed 1 Dec 2018.
  18. Raver, Cybele C. 2004. Placing emotional self-regulation in sociocultural and socioeconomic contexts. Child Development 75:346–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schenk, Sabrina, Robert K. Lech, und Boris Suchan. 2017. Games people play: How Video Games improve probabilistic learning. Behavioural Brain Research 335:208–214.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2017.08.027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sheffield-Morris, Amanda, Silk S. Jennifer, Laurence Steinberg, Sonya S. Myers, und Lara R. Robinson. 2007. The role of the family context in the development of emotion regulation. Social Development 16 (2): 361–388.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2007.00389.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rooij, Van, J. Antonius, Tim M. Schoenmakers, AdA Vermulst, Regina Van den Eijnden, und Dike Van de Mheen. 2011. Online Video Game addiction: Identification of addicted adolescent gamers. Addiction 106 (1): 205–212.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03104.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Waddell, Margot. 2018. On adolescence. The Tavistock clinic series. London: Karnac.Google Scholar
  23. Winnicott, Donald W. 1971. Playing and reality. London: Tavistock Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  24. World Health Organization. 1992. The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: Clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  25. Zaheer, Hussain, and Mark D. Griffiths. 2011. Online gaming addiction: Classification, prediction and associated frisk factors. Addiction Research and Theory 20 (5): 359–371.  https://doi.org/10.3109/16066359.2011.640442 (October 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zaheer, Hussain and Mark D. Griffiths. 2014. A qualitative analysis of online gaming: Social Interaction, community, and game design. International Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning, 4 (2): 41–57.  https://doi.org/10.4018/ijcbpl.2014040104 (April-June 2014.41).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations