Mobile Learning and Human-Artificial Cooperation in Logistics

  • M. KlumppEmail author
  • T. Neukirchen
  • W. Koop


An implication of the concept of digitization-induced Artificial Divide (Klumpp, 2017) is that whether AI measures can be accessed and successfully implemented has a separating effect on people and organizations for individual prospects and social participation likely are affected (see Fig. 1). Since human-artificial cooperation and willingness to adapt are required of individuals in logistics (Zijm, Klumpp, 2017), mobile learning environments can contribute to the required media literacy in general and convey particular skills efficiently. By having content for mandatory employee certification conveyed via mobile learning, employers can contribute to an easing of digitization transitions, and all participants can be sure that efforts in using novel approaches will not be done just for their own sake.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bernheim, D., (2016), The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: A Unified Approach to Behavioral Welfare Economics, Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 7(1), pp. 12-68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Book, M., Gruhn, V., Striemer, R., (2016), Erfolgreiche agile Projekte: Pragmatische Kooperation und faires Contracting, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  3. Brathwaite, B., Schreiber, I. (2009): Challenges for Game Designers, Boston 2009.Google Scholar
  4. Csikszentmihalyi, M., (2000), Happiness, Flow, and Economics Equality, American Psychologist, 55(10), pp. 1163-64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Deci, E., Ryan, R., (2004), Handbook of self-determination research, University of Rochester, Rochester.Google Scholar
  6. Deterding, S., (2011), Situated Motivational Affordances of Game Elements: A Conceptual Model. Presented at Gamification: Using Game Design Elements in Non-Gaming Contexts, a Workshop at CHI 2011.Google Scholar
  7. de Witt, C., Gloerfeld, C., (2013). Mobile Learning in der beruflichen Bildung – Grundlagen, Konzept, Best Practice, in: Handbuch für Aus- und Weiterbildung (HAW), 4318, pp. 1-22, Wolters Kluwer, Köln.Google Scholar
  8. ERC Guidelines 2015 Writing Group, (2015), European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for ResuscitationGoogle Scholar
  9. 2015, Resuscitation 95(10), pp.1-311.Google Scholar
  10. European Commission, Directorate General for Mobility and Transport, (2014), Cargo Securing for Road Transport, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg,
  11. Günthner, W. A., Mandl, H., Klevers, M., Sailer, M. (2015), GameLog – Gamification in der Intralogistik, AIF Whitepaper, Lehrstuhl für Fördertechnik Materialfluss Logistik, München.Google Scholar
  12. Hevner, A., March, S., Park, J. and Ram, S., (2004), Design science in information systems research, MIS Quarterly, 28, 1, 75-105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hense J., Klevers M., Sailer M., Horenburg T., Mandl H., Günthner W. (2014), Using Gamification to Enhance Staff Motivation in Logistics, in: Meijer S. A., Smeds, R. (Eds.) Frontiers in Gaming Simulation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8264, Springer, Cham.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Klumpp, M., (2016), Logistics Qualification: Best-Practice for a Knowledge-Intensive Service Industry, in: Zijm, W. H. M., Klumpp, M., Clausen, U., ten Hompel, M. (Eds.), Logistics and Supply Chain Innovation, p. 391-411. Springer, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  15. Klumpp, M., (2017), Artificial Divide: The New Challenge of Human-Artificial Performance in Logistics. In: Proff, H., Fojcik, T. (Eds), Innovative Produkte und Dienstleistungen in der Mobilität, p. 583-593, Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Klumpp, M., Bioly, S., Keuschen, T., (2015), Praxissituation der Berufskraftfahrenden, in: Logistik für Unternehmen, 9, pp. 55-57.Google Scholar
  17. Klumpp, M., Neukirchen, T., Jäger, S. (2016), Logistikqualifikation und Gamification – Der wissenschaftliche und fachpraktische Ansatz des Projektes MARTINA, ild Schriftenreihe Logistikforschung 51, Essen.Google Scholar
  18. Lucke, U., Rensing, C., 2014. A Survey on Pervasive Education. Pervasive and Mo-bile Computing. Special Issue on Pervasive Education, Elsevier.Google Scholar
  19. Meier, C., Mönnig, M., Koop, W., Kleffmann,M., Neukirchen, T., Jäger, S., Klumpp, M., (2017), Logistikqualifikation und Gamification – Softwareentwicklung und Pilotierung der MARTINAApp,ild Schriftenreihe Logistikforschung 55, Essen.Google Scholar
  20. Mekler, E. D., Brühlmann, F., Tuch, A. N., Opwis, K., (2015), Towards understanding the effects of individual gamification elements on intrinsic motivation and performance, in: Computers in Human Behavior, Scholar
  21. Neukirchen, T., Kleffmann, M., Koop, W., Jäger, S., Klumpp, M. (2017), Evaluation von mobilen Trainingsanwendungen in der Logistik: Nutzerfeedback der MARTINA-App, ild Schriftenreihe Logistikforschung 56, Essen.Google Scholar
  22. Reise, C., Müller, B., Seliger, G., (2015). Resource Efficiency Learning Game – Electric Scooter Game, in: Procedia CIRP, 15, p. 355-360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Richter, G., Raban, D. R., Rafaeli, S., (2015), A RECIPE for Meaningful Gamification, in: Reiners, T., Wood, L., C. (Eds.) Gamification in Education and Business. Springer, Cham, pp. 21-46.Google Scholar
  24. Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L., (2000), Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being. American Psychologist 55(1), S. 68-78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, (2015), European Agreement con-cerning the International Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Road. United Nations Publication 14.VIII.1.Google Scholar
  26. Vaishnavi, V. K. and Kuechler, W., (2007), Design Science Research Methods and Patterns: Innovating Information and Communication Technology, Taylor & Francis, New York.Google Scholar
  27. VDI Verein Deutscher Ingenieure, (2004), Securing of loads on road vehicles, VDI-Handbuch Materialfluss und Fördertechnik, Band 6 VDI-Handbuch Ladungssicherung, Düsseldorf.Google Scholar
  28. Wirdemann, R., (2011), Scrum mit User Stories, München.Google Scholar
  29. Wood, L. C., Reiners, T, (2012), Gamification in logistics and supply chain education: extending active learning, in: Kommers, P., Issa, T, Isaias, P. (Eds.), Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference on Internet Technologies & Society (ITS 2012), pp.101-108.Google Scholar
  30. Zagel, C., Bodendorf, F. (2014), Gamification: Auswirkungen auf Usability, Datenqualität und Motivation, in: Koch, M., Butz, A., Schlichter, J. (Eds.), Mensch und Computer 2014, München, Oldenbourg, pp. 15-24.Google Scholar
  31. Zijm, W. H. M. and Klumpp, M., (2017), Future Logistics – What to expect, how to adapt, in: Freitag, M., Kotzab, H. and Pannek, J. (Eds.), Dynamics in Logistics Proceedings of the 5th International Conference LDIC, 2016 Bremen, Germany, Springer, Bremen, pp. 365-379.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.FOM Hochschule EssenEssenDeutschland
  2. 2.Universität Duisburg-EssenEssenDeutschland

Personalised recommendations