Advertisement

The effective use of ethanol for GHG emissions reduction in a dual‑fuel engine

  • Vinícius B. PedrozoEmail author
  • I. May
  • T. Lanzanova
  • W. Guan
  • H. Zhao
Conference paper
Part of the Proceedings book series (PROCEE)

Zusammenfassung

Regulations have been established for the monitoring and reporting of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and fuel consumption from the transport sector, including heavy-duty vehicles. Low carbon fuels combined with new powertrain technologies have the potential to provide significant reductions in GHG emissions while decreasing the dependency on fossil fuels. In this study, advanced combustion control strategies have been used as means to improve upon the efficiency and emissions of a lean-burn ethanol-diesel dual-fuel engine.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. 1.
    European Environment Agency. Greenhouse gas emissions from transport. Indicator Assessment (2018). Available at: https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-andmaps/indicators/transport-emissions-of-greenhouse-gases/transport-emissions-ofgreenhouse-gases-10. (Accessed: 27th August 2018)
  2. 2.
    Rodríguez, F. Fuel consumption simulation of HDVs in the EU: comparisons and limitations. ICCT White Pap. (2018).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    European Automobile Manufacturers Association (ACEA). Vehicles in use Europe 2017. ACEA Rep. (2017).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    GISTEMP Team. GISS Surface Temperature Analysis (GISTEMP). NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies (2017). Available at: https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/. (Accessed: 4th July 2017)
  5. 5.
    Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. IPCC Fifth Assess. Rep. 1–112 (2015).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    European Commission. Reducing CO2 emissions from heavy-duty vehicles. (2018). Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/transport/vehicles/heavy_en. (Accessed: 27th August 2018)
  7. 7.
    The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. Proposal for a regulation setting CO2 emission performance standards for new heavy-duty vehicles - COM(2018) 284 final/2. Corrigendum (2018).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association (ACEA). The European Commission proposal on CO2 standards for new heavy-duty vehicles. ACEA Position Pap. (2018).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. Commission Regulation (EU) No 2017/2400. Off. J. Eur. Union 349, (2017).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) - National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) - Department of Transportation (DOT). Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Fuel Efficiency Standards for Medium- and Heavy-Duty Engines and Vehicles - Phase 2. Fed. Regist. - Rules Regul. 81, (2016).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    The International Council on Clean Transportation. United States Efficiency and Greenhouse Gas Emission Regulations for Model Year 2018-2027 Heavy-Duty Vehicles, Engines, and Trailers. ICCT Policy Updat. (2016).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Johnson, T. & Joshi, A. Review of Vehicle Engine Efficiency and Emissions. SAE Tech. Pap. (2017).  https://doi.org/10.4271/2017-01-0907
  13. 13.
    British Petroleum (BP). BP Technology Outlook 2018. (2018).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ricardo, TRL & TTR. Heavy vehicle platoons on UK roads: feasibility study. Dep. Transp. Cent. Connect. Auton. Veh. (2014).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pedrozo, V. B., May, I., Guan, W. & Zhao, H. High efficiency ethanol-diesel dual-fuel combustion: A comparison against conventional diesel combustion from low to full engine load. Fuel 230, 440–451 (2018).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Edwards, R., Larivé, J.-F., Rickeard, D. & Weindorf, W. Well-to-Wheels analysis of future automotive fuels and powertrains in the European context: Well-to-Tank Appendix 2 - Version 4a. Jt. Res. Cent. Eur. Comm. EUCAR, CONCAWE 1–133 (2014). https://doi.org/10.2790/95629Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Edwards, R., Larivé, J.-F., Rickeard, D. & Weindorf, W. Well-to-Wheels analysis of future automotive fuels and powertrains in the European context: Well-to-Tank Report - Version 4.a. Jt. Res. Cent. Eur. Comm. EUCAR, CONCAWE 4.a, (2014).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Heywood, J. B. Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals. (McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1988).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pedrozo, V. B. An experimental study of ethanol-diesel dual-fuel combustion for high efficiency and clean heavy-duty engines. (Brunel University London, 2017).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Asad, U., Kumar, R., Zheng, M. & Tjong, J. Ethanol-fueled low temperature combustion: A pathway to clean and efficient diesel engine cycles. Appl. Energy (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Divekar, P. S., Asad, U., Tjong, J., Chen, X. & Zheng, M. An engine cycle analysis of diesel-ignited ethanol low-temperature combustion. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part D J. Automob. Eng. (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1177/0954407015598244Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Júnior, R. F. B. & Martins, C. A. Emissions analysis of a diesel engine operating in Diesel-Ethanol Dual-Fuel mode. Fuel 148, 191–201 (2014).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ogawa, H., Shibata, G., Kato, T. & Zhao, P. Dual Fuel Diesel Combustion with Premixed Ethanol as the Main Fuel. SAE Tech. Pap. 2014-01–2687 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.4271/2014-01-2687
  24. 24.
    Wang, Y., Yao, M., Li, T., Zhang, W. & Zheng, Z. A parametric study for enabling reactivity controlled compression ignition (RCCI) operation in diesel engines at various engine loads. Appl. Energy 175, 389–402 (2016).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Desantes, J. M., Benajes, J., García, A. & Monsalve-Serrano, J. The role of the in-cylinder gas temperature and oxygen concentration over low load reactivity controlled compression ignition combustion efficiency. Energy 78, 854–868 (2014).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    May, I. et al. Characterization and Potential of Premixed Dual-Fuel Combustion in a Heavy Duty Natural Gas/Diesel Engine. SAE Tech. Pap. (2016).  https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-01-0790
  27. 27.
    Goldsworthy, L. Fumigation of a heavy duty common rail marine diesel engine with ethanol-water mixtures. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 47, 48–59 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Benajes, J., García, A., Monsalve-Serrano, J., Balloul, I. & Pradel, G. An assessment of the dual-mode reactivity controlled compression ignition/conventional diesel combustion capabilities in a EURO VI medium-duty diesel engine fueled with an intermediate ethanol-gasoline blend and biodiesel. Energy Convers. Manag. 123, 381–391 (2016).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Schwoerer, J., Kumar, K., Ruggiero, B. & Swanbon, B. Lost-Motion VVA Systems for Enabling Next Generation Diesel Engine Efficiency and After-Treatment Optimization. SAE Tech. Pap. (2010).  https://doi.org/10.4271/2010-01-1189
  30. 30.
    Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UN/ECE). Regulation No 49 - Uniform provisions concerning the measures to be taken against the emission of gaseous and particulate pollutants from compression-ignition engines and positive ignition engines for use in vehicles. Off. J. Eur. Union 171, (2013).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pedrozo, V. B. & Zhao, H. Improvement in high load ethanol-diesel dual-fuel combustion by Miller cycle and charge air cooling. Appl. Energy 210, 138–151 (2018).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Pedrozo, V. B., May, I., Lanzanova, T. D. M. & Zhao, H. Potential of internal EGR and throttled operation for low load extension of ethanol–diesel dual-fuel reactivity controlled compression ignition combustion on a heavy-duty engine. Fuel 179, 391–405 (2016).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Pedrozo, V. B., May, I. & Zhao, H. Characterization of Low Load Ethanol Dual-Fuel Combustion using Single and Split Diesel Injections on a Heavy-Duty Engine. SAE Tech. Pap. (2016).  https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-01-0778
  34. 34.
    Pedrozo, V. B., May, I. & Zhao, H. Exploring the mid-load potential of ethanol-diesel dualfuel combustion with and without EGR. Appl. Energy 193, 263–275 (2017).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    35. Reitz, R. D. Directions in internal combustion engine research. Combust. Flame 160, 1–8 (2013).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Edwards, S. P., Frankle, G. R., Wirbeleit, F. & Raab, A. The Potential of a Combined Miller Cycle and Internal EGR Engine for Future Heavy Duty Truck Applications. SAE Tech. Pap. (1998).  https://doi.org/10.4271/980180
  37. 37.
    Martins, M. E. S. & Lanzanova, T. D. M. Full-load Miller cycle with ethanol and EGR: Potential benefits and challenges. Appl. Therm. Eng. 90, 274–285 (2015).Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zhao, J. Research and application of over-expansion cycle (Atkinson and Miller) engines – A review. Appl. Energy 185, 300–319 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kokjohn, S. L., Hanson, R. M., Splitter, D. a & Reitz, R. D. Fuel reactivity controlled compression ignition (RCCI): a pathway to controlled high-efficiency clean combustion. Int. J. Engine Res. 12, 209–226 (2011).Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. Directive 2009/28/EC. Off. J. Eur. Union 140, (2009).Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ramachandran, S. & Stimming, U. Well to wheel analysis of low carbon alternatives for road traffic. Energy Environ. Sci. 8, 3313–3324 (2015).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vinícius B. Pedrozo
    • 1
    Email author
  • I. May
    • 1
  • T. Lanzanova
    • 1
  • W. Guan
    • 1
  • H. Zhao
    • 1
  1. 1.Brunel University LondonLondonGroßbritannien

Personalised recommendations