Advertisement

Mitral Valve Quantification at a Glance

Flattening Patient-Specific Valve Geometry
  • Pepe EulzerEmail author
  • Nils Lichtenberg
  • Rawa Arif
  • Andreas Brcic
  • Matthias Karck
  • Kai Lawonn
  • Raffaele De Simone
  • Sandy Engelhardt
Conference paper
Part of the Informatik aktuell book series (INFORMAT)

Zusammenfassung

Malfunctioning mitral valves can be restored through complex surgical interventions, which greatly benefit from intensive planning and pre-operative analysis from echocardiography. Visualization techniques provide a possibility to enhance such preparation processes and can also facilitate post-operative evaluation. In this work we extend current research in this field, building upon patient-specific mitral valve segmentations that are represented as triangulated 3D surface models. We propose a 2D-map construction of these models, which can provide physicians with a view of the whole surface at once. This allows assessment of the valve’s area and shape without the need for different viewing angles and scene interaction. Clinically highly relevant pathology indicators, such as coaptation zone areas or prolapsed regions are color coded on these maps, making it easier to fully comprehend the underlying pathology. Quality and effectiveness of the proposed methods were evaluated through a user survey conducted with domain experts.We assessed pathology detection accuracy using 3D valve models in comparison to the developed method. Classification accuracy increased by 2.8% across all tested valves and by 10.4% for prolapsed valves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. 1.
    Hormann K, Polthier K, Sheffer A. Mesh parameterization: theory and practice. Course presented at ACM SIGGRAPH; 2008.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kreiser J, Meuschke M, Mistelbauer G, et al. A survey of attening-based medical visualization techniques. Comput Graph Forum. 2018;37(3):597-624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Born S, Sündermann SH, Russ C, et al. Stent maps: comparative visualization for the prediction of adverse events of transcatheter aortic valve implantations. IEEE Trans Vis Comp Graph. 2014;20(12):2704-2713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Engelhardt S, Lichtenberg N, Al-Maisary S, et al. Towards automatic assessment of the mitral valve coaptation zone from 4D ultrasound. Funct Imaging Mod Heart. 2015;9126:137-145.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Grossmann N, Köppel T, Gröller E, et al. VisualFlatter: visual analysis of distortions in the projection of biomedical structures. Eurographics Workshop Vis Comput Biomed. 2018; p. 167-177.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Carpentier A, Adams DH, Filsoufi F. Carpentier’s Reconstructive Valve Surgery. Maryland Heights, Missouri: Saunders/Elsevier; 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hammer PE, Perrin DP, Pedro J, et al. Image-based mass-spring model of mitral valve closure for surgical planning. Proc SPIE. 2008;6918:69180Q.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pepe Eulzer
    • 1
    Email author
  • Nils Lichtenberg
    • 1
  • Rawa Arif
    • 2
  • Andreas Brcic
    • 3
  • Matthias Karck
    • 2
  • Kai Lawonn
    • 1
  • Raffaele De Simone
    • 2
  • Sandy Engelhardt
    • 4
  1. 1.Institute for Computational VisualisticsUniversity of Koblenz-LandauKoblenzDeutschland
  2. 2.Department of Cardiac SurgeryHeidelberg University HospitalHeidelbergDeutschland
  3. 3.Department of AnaesthesiologyHeidelberg University HospitalHeidelbergDeutschland
  4. 4.Department of Computer ScienceMannheim University of Applied SciencesMannheimDeutschland

Personalised recommendations