Advertisement

Merkmale, Strukturen und Persönlichkeitsmerkmale erfolgreicher Karrieren: Was bedeutet Erfolg?

  • Stefan DiestelEmail author
Chapter

Zusammenfassung

Dieser Beitrag ist den psychologischen Erfolgsfaktoren der beruflichen Karriere gewidmet, die neben Qualifikation, beruflichen Erfahrungen und Kenntnissen auch durch Persönlichkeit, übergreifende Fähigkeiten sowie das Selbstvertrauen und die Attraktivität beeinflusst wird. Auf der Grundlage aktueller empirischer Erkenntnisse aus der wirtschaftspsychologischen Forschung werden die Einflüsse dieser Erfolgsfaktoren mit Blick auf Einkommen, Karriere und berufliche Leistung sowie auf psychische Gesundheit dargestellt.

Literatur

  1. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191.
  2. Bendel, O. (2018). Disruptive Technologien, Revision vom 19.02.2018. Gabler Wirtschaftslexikon. https://wirtschaftslexikon.gabler.de/definition/disruptive-technologien-54194/version-277246. Zugegriffen: 19. Nov. 2018.
  3. Biddle, J. E., & Hamermesh, D. S. (1998). Beauty, productivity, and discrimination: Lawyers‘ looks and Lucre. Journal of Labor Economics, 16(1), 172.Google Scholar
  4. Blickle, G., & Gläser, D. (2009). Politische Fertigkeiten und Arbeitsstile: Eine Feldstudie = Political skills and working styles: A field study. Zeitschrift Für Arbeits- Und Organisationspsychologie, 53(3), 94–103.  https://doi.org/10.1026/0932-4089.53.3.94.
  5. Chiaburu, D. S., Oh, I.-S., Berry, C. M., Li, N., & Gardner, R. G. (2011). The five-factor model of personality traits and organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(6), 1140–1166.Google Scholar
  6. Converse, P. D., Thackray, M., Piccone, K., Sudduth, M. M., Tocci, M. C., & Miloslavic, S. A. (2016). Integrating self-control with physical attractiveness and cognitive ability to examine pathways to career success. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 89(1), 73–91.  https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12107.
  7. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 5–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.5.
  8. de Ridder, D. T. D., Lensvelt-Mulders, G., Finkenauer, C., Stok, F. M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2012). Taking stock of self-control: A meta-analysis of how trait self-control relates to a wide range of behaviors. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(1), 76–99.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868311418749.
  9. Diestel, S., Rivkin, W., & Schmidt, K.-H. (2015). Sleep quality and self-control capacity as protective resources in the daily emotional labor process: Results from two diary studies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(3), 809–827.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038373.
  10. Ferris, G. R., Treadway, D. C., Kolodinsky, R. W., Hochwarter, W. A., Kacmar, C. J., Douglas, C., & Frink, D. D. (2005). Development and validation of the political skill Inventory. Journal of Management, 31(1), 126–152.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206304271386.
  11. Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2013): The future of employment. How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Oxford: Martin School. http://sep4u.gr/wp-content/uploads/The_Future_of_Employment_ox_2013.pdf. Zugegriffen: 25. Okt. 2018.
  12. Ganzach, Y., Gotlibobski, C., Greenberg, D., & Pazy, A. (2013). General mental ability and pay: Nonlinear effects. Intelligence, 41(5), 631–637.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2013.07.015.
  13. Gonzalez-Mulé, E., Mount, M. K., & Oh, I.-S. (2014). A meta-analysis of the relationship between general mental ability and nontask performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(6), 1222–1243.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037547.
  14. Grant, A. M. (2013). Rethinking the extraverted sales ideal: The ambivert advantage. Psychological Science, 24(6), 1024–1030.Google Scholar
  15. Hacker, W. (1998). Allgemeine Arbeitspsychologie: Psychische Regulation von Arbeitstätigkeiten. Bern: Huber.Google Scholar
  16. Harper, B. (2000). Beauty, stature and the labour market: A British cohort study. Oxford Bulletin of Economics & Statistics, 62(5), 771.Google Scholar
  17. Harvey, P., Harris, R. B., Harris, K. J., & Wheeler, A. R. (2007). Attenuating the effects of social stress: The impact of political skill. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12(2), 105–115.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.12.2.105.
  18. Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Ilies, R., & Gerhardt, M. W. (2002). Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 765–780.Google Scholar
  19. Judge, T. A., Jackson, C. L., Shaw, J. C., Scott, B. A., & Rich, B. L. (2007). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: The integral role of individual differences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 107–127.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.107.
  20. Judge, T. A., Hurst, C., & Simon, L. S. (2009). Does it pay to be smart, attractive, or confident (or all three)? Relationships among general mental ability, physical attractiveness, core self-evaluations, and income. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(3), 742–755.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015497.
  21. Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2001). A theoretical basis for the major dimensions of personality. European Journal of Personality, 15(5), 327–353.Google Scholar
  22. Meier, L. L., Semmer, N. K., Elfering, A., & Jacobshagen, N. (2008). The double meaning of control: Three-way interactions between internal resources, job control, and stressors at work. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 13(3), 244–258.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.13.3.244.
  23. Mount, M., Ilies, R., & Johnson, E. (2006). Relationship of personality traits and counterproductive work behaviors: The mediating effects of job satisfaction. Personnel psychology, 59(3), 591–622.Google Scholar
  24. Munyon, T. P., Summers, J. K., Thompson, K. M., & Ferris, G. R. (2015). Political skill and work outcomes: A theoretical extension, meta-analytic investigation, and agenda for the future. Personnel Psychology, 68(1), 143–184.  https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12066.
  25. Oh, I.-S., Lee, K., Ashton, M. C., & de Vries, R. E. (2011). Are dishonest extraverts more harmful than dishonest introverts? The interaction effects of honesty-humility and extraversion in predicting workplace deviance. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 60(3), 496–516.Google Scholar
  26. Owens, B. P., Wallace, A. S., & Waldman, D. A. (2015). Leader narcissism and follower outcomes: The counterbalancing effect of leader humility. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(4), 1203–1213.Google Scholar
  27. Richardson, K., & Norgate, S. H. (2015). Does IQ really predict job performance? Applied Developmental Science, 19(3), 153–169.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2014.983635.
  28. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 262–274.Google Scholar
  29. Schmidt, K.-H., Hupke, M., & Diestel, S. (2012). Does dispositional capacity for self-control attenuate the relation between self-control demands at work and indicators of job strain? Work & Stress, 26(1), 21–38.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2012.660367.
  30. Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (2002). Das Konzept der Selbstwirksamkeit. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik – Beiheft, 44, 28–53.Google Scholar
  31. Stumm, S., Thomas, E., & Dormann, C. (2010). Selbstregulationsstärke und Leistung. Dualer Prädiktor im dualen Hochschulstudium. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 54(4), 171–181.  https://doi.org/10.1026/0932-4089/a000029.
  32. Tangney, J. P., Baumeister, R. F., & Boone, A. L. (2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72(2), 271–324.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00263.x.
  33. Thorndike, E. L. (1920). A constant error in psychological ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 4(1), 25–29.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0071663.
  34. Treadway, D. C., Ferris, G. R., Duke, A. B., Adams, G. L., & Thatcher, J. B. (2007). The moderating role of subordinate political skill on supervisors’ impressions of subordinate ingratiation and ratings of subordinate interpersonal facilitation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3), 848–855.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.848.
  35. Yam, K. C., Fehr, R., Keng-Highberger, F. T., Klotz, A. C., & Reynolds, S. J. (2016). Out of control: A self-control perspective on the link between surface acting and abusive supervision. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(2), 292–301.  https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000043.
  36. Wells, F. L. (1907). A statistical study of literary merit (Columbia Univ Cont to Phil & Psych, 16, 3). Archives of Psychology, 7. Google Scholar
  37. Zettler, I. (2011). Self-control and academic performance: Two field studies on university citizenship behavior and counterproductive academic behavior. Learning & Individual Differences, 21(1), 119–123.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.11.002.

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bergische Universität WuppertalWuppertalDeutschland

Personalised recommendations