Advertisement

Risk Attitudes, Gender, and Risk Behavior: Evidence from Two Laboratory Experiments

  • Christine ProkopEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Jahrbuch für Handlungs- und Entscheidungstheorie book series (JAHAEN)

Abstract

This study analyzes whether self-reported attitudes in economic risk taking predict experimentally revealed risk behavior, and how gender moderates the relationship between both measures. Prior research often finds women reporting higher risk averse attitudes than men and showing more risk averse behavior in observational or experimental studies. This study analyzes observations from 369 students who participated in two laboratory experiments and answered a survey about their risk preferences. The findings show that risk attitudes are not likely to predict risk behavior directly, but being female predicts risk averse behavior robustly. Most interestingly, the analyses show that in the experiments, women behave consistently to their self-reported risk attitudes, but men do not. Methodological and practical implications are briefly discussed.

References

  1. Ajzen, Icek, and Martin Fishbein. 1977. Attitude-Behavior Relations: A Theoretical Analysis and Review of Empirical Research, Psychological Bulletin 84 (5): 888–918.Google Scholar
  2. Arrow, Kenneth Joseph. 1971. Essays in the Theory of Risk-Bearing. Vol. 1. Markham Publishing Company Chicago.Google Scholar
  3. Berg, Joyce, John Dickhaut, Kevin McCabe, and Vernon L. Smith. 2005. Risk Preference Instability across Institutions: A Dilemma, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102 (11): 4209–14.Google Scholar
  4. Bohner, Gerd, and Nina Dickel. 2011. Attitudes and Attitude Change, Annual Review of Psychology 62: 391–417.Google Scholar
  5. Bruhin, Adrian, Helga Fehr-Duda, and Thomas Epper. 2010. Risk and Rationality: Uncovering Heterogeneity in Probability Distortion, Econometrica 78 (4): 1375–412.Google Scholar
  6. Byrnes, James P., David C. Miller, and William D. Schafer. 1999. Gender Differences in Risk Taking: A Meta-Analysis, Psychological Bulletin 125 (3): 367.Google Scholar
  7. Chakravarty, Sujoy, Glenn W. Harrison, Ernan E. Haruvy, and E. Elisabet Rutström. 2011. Are You Risk Averse over Other People’s Money?” Southern Economic Journal 77 (4): 901–13.Google Scholar
  8. Charness, Gary, and Uri Gneezy. 2012. Strong Evidence for Gender Differences in Risk Taking, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 83 (1): 50–58.Google Scholar
  9. Charness, Gary, Uri Gneezy, and Alex Imas. 2013. Explerimental Methods: Eliciting Risk Preferences, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 87: 43–51.Google Scholar
  10. Cohn, Alain, Ernst Fehr, and Michel André Maréchal. 2017. Do Professional Norms in the Banking Industry Favor Risk-Taking?, The Review of Financial Studies 30 (11): 3801–23.Google Scholar
  11. Croson, Rachel, and Uri Gneezy. 2009. Gender Differences in Preferences, Journal of Economic Literature 47 (2): 448–74.Google Scholar
  12. Daruvala, Dinky. 2007. Gender, Risk and Stereotypes, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 35 (3): 265–83.Google Scholar
  13. Dohmen, Thomas, Armin Falk, David Huffman, Uwe Sunde, Jürgen Schupp, and Gert G. Wagner. 2011. Individual Risk Attitudes: Measurement, Determinants, and Behavioral Consequences, Journal of the European Economic Association, 9: 522–50.Google Scholar
  14. Eckel, Catherine C., and Philip J. Grossman. 2002. Sex Differences and Statistical Stereotyping in Attitudes toward Financial Risk, Evolution and Human Behavior 23 (4): 281–95.Google Scholar
  15. Eckel, Catherine C., and Philip J. Grossmann. 2008. Forecasting Risk Attitudes: An Experimental Study Using Actual and Forecast Gamble Choices, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 68 (1): 1–17.Google Scholar
  16. Engel, Russell. 2011. First Price Auctions, Lotteries, and Risk Preferences Across Institutions, Journal of Business & Economics Research 9 (11): 9–27.Google Scholar
  17. Fehr-Duda, Helga, Manuele de Gennaro, and Renate Schubert. 2006. Gender, Financial Risk, and Probability Weights, Theory and Decision 60 (2–3): 283–313.Google Scholar
  18. Fellner, Gerlinde, and Boris Maciejovsky. 2007. Risk Attitude and Market Behavior: Evidence from Experimental Asset Markets, Journal of Economic Psychology 28 (3): 338–50.Google Scholar
  19. Finucane, Melissa L., Paul Slovic, Chris K. Mertz, James Flynn, and Theresa A. Satterfield. 2000. Gender, Race, and Perceived Risk: The’white Male’effect, Health, Risk & Society 2 (2): 159–72.Google Scholar
  20. Fischbacher, Urs. 2007. Z-Tree: Zurich Toolbox for Ready-Made Economic Experiments, Experimental Economics 10 (2): 171–78.Google Scholar
  21. Gintis, Herbert. 2000. Game Theory Evolving: A Problem-Centered Introduction to Modeling Strategic Behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  22. GSOEP. 2004. German Socio-Economic Panel. Berlin: German Institute for Economic Research (DIW).Google Scholar
  23. Hainmueller, Jens. 2012. Entropy Balancing for Causal Effects: A Multivariate Reweighting Method to Produce Balanced Samples in Observational Studies, Political Analysis 20 (1): 25–46.Google Scholar
  24. Halek, Martin, and Joseph G. Eisenhauer. 2001. Demography of Risk Aversion, Journal of Risk & Insurance 68 (1): 1–24.Google Scholar
  25. Harrison, Glenn W., Eric Johnson, Melayne M. McInnes, and E. Elisabet Rutström. 2005. Temporal Stability of Estimates of Risk Aversion, Applied Financial Economics Letters 1 (1): 31–35.Google Scholar
  26. Harrison, Glenn W., and E. Elisabet Rutström. 2008. Risk Aversion in the Laboratory, Research in Experimental Economics, 12: 41–196.Google Scholar
  27. Holt, Charles A. 2007. Markets, Games, & Strategic Behavior. Boston, MA: Pearson Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  28. Holt, Charles A., and Susan K. Laury. 2002. Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects, The American Economic Review 92 (5): 1644–55.Google Scholar
  29. Holt, Charles A., and Susan K. Laury. 2005. Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects: New Data without Order Effects, The American Economic Review 95 (3): 902–4.Google Scholar
  30. Kahneman, Daniel. 1992. Reference Points, Anchors, Norms, and Mixed Feelings, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 51: 269–312.Google Scholar
  31. Kraus, Stephen J. 1995. Attitudes and the Prediction of Behavior: A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 21 (1): 58–75.Google Scholar
  32. Kelley, Matthew R., and Robert J. Lemke. 2015. Gender Differences When Subjective Probabilities Affect Risky Decisions: An Analysis from the Television Game Show Cash Cab, Theory and Decision. 78 (1): 153–70.Google Scholar
  33. Knight, Frank H. 1921. Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. New York: Hart, Schaffner, and Marx.Google Scholar
  34. Lemaster, Philip, and JoNell Strough. 2014. Beyond Mars and Venus: Understanding Gender Differences in Financial Risk Tolerance, Journal of Economic Psychology 42: 148–60.Google Scholar
  35. Levin, Irwin P., Mary A. Snyder, and Daniel P. Chapman. 1988. The Interaction of Experiential and Situational Factors and Gender in a Simulated Risky Decision-Making Task, The Journal of Psychology 122 (2): 173–81.Google Scholar
  36. Levin, Irwin P., Stephanie S. Hart, Joshua A. Weller, and Lyndsay A. Harshman. 2007. Stability of Choices in a Risky Decision-Making Task: A 3-Year Longitudinal Study with Children and Adults, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 20 (3): 241–52.Google Scholar
  37. Lönnqvist, Jan-Erik, Markku Verkasalo, Gari Walkowitz, and Philipp C. Wichardt. 2015. Measuring Individual Risk Attitudes in the Lab: Task or Ask? An Empirical Comparison, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 119: 254–66.Google Scholar
  38. Maccoby, Eleanor E., and Nathan Maccoby. 1954. The Interview: A Tool of Social Science, Edited by Gardner Lindzey. Handbook of Social Psychology 1: 449–87.Google Scholar
  39. Meier, Kenneth J., Laurence J. O’Toole Jr, and Holly T. Goerdel. 2006. Management Activity and Program Performance: Gender as Management Capital, Public Administration Review 66 (1): 24–36.Google Scholar
  40. Milgrom, Paul R., and Robert J. Weber. 1982. A Theory of Auctions and Competitive Bidding, Econometrica 50 (5): 1089–122.Google Scholar
  41. Morin, Roger, and A. Fernandez Suarez. 1983. Risk Aversion Revisited, Journal of Finance 38 (4): 1201–16.Google Scholar
  42. O’Brien, Diana Z. 2015. Rising to the Top: Gender, Political Performance, and Party Leadership in Parliamentary Democracies, American Journal of Political Science 59 (4): 1022–39.Google Scholar
  43. Pedroni, Andreas, Renato Frey, Adrian Bruhin, Gilles Dutilh, Ralph Hertwig, and Jörg Rieskamp. 2017. The Risk Elicitation Puzzle, Nature Human Behaviour 1 (11): 803–9.Google Scholar
  44. Powell, Melanie, and David Ansic. 1997. Gender Differences in Risk Behaviour in Financial Decision-Making: An Experimental Analysis, Journal of Economic Psychology 18 (6): 605–28.Google Scholar
  45. Schubert, Renate, Martin Brown, Matthias Gysler, and Hans Wolfgang Brachinger. 1999. Financial Decision-Making: Are Women Really More Risk-Averse?” The American Economic Review 89 (2): 381–85.Google Scholar
  46. Von Neumann, John, and Oskar Morgenstern. 1947. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Wärneryd, Karl-Erik. 1996. Risk Attitudes and Risky Behavior, Journal of Economic Psychology 17 (6): 749–70.Google Scholar
  48. Zizzo, Daniel John. 2010. Experimenter Demand Effects in Economic Experiments, Experimental Economics 13 (1): 75–98.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fakultät für Bildungs- und SozialwissenschaftenOldenburgGermany

Personalised recommendations