Advertisement

Digitalisierung der Arbeit und des HR-Managements – Eine empirische Analyse der Einstellungen von Beschäftigten

  • Christian RüttgersEmail author
  • Katharina Hochgürtel
Chapter
Part of the FOM-Edition book series (FOMEDITION)

Zusammenfassung

Im Rahmen eines 2017 abgeschlossenen Forschungsprojektes haben die Autoren untersucht, welche Effekte von verschiedenen Ausprägungen der Digitalisierung auf Einstellungen von Beschäftigten ausgehen. Basis ist eine Befragung von Berufstätigen. Die Kernaussagen dieser Kurzfassung von Rüttgers und Hochgürtel (ipo Schriftenreihe der FOM. MA Akademie Verlags- und Druck-Gesellschaft mbH, Essen, 2017) lauten: Mit einem digitalen Personaleinsatzplanungssystem kann ein größeres Gerechtigkeitsempfinden der Mitarbeiter einhergehen. Stärkere Ausprägungen der Gerechtigkeitsdimensionen sind wiederum mit höherer Mitarbeiterbindung und Arbeitszufriedenheit assoziiert. Mit vermehrter Nutzungsintensität mobiler IKT, Telearbeit, flexiblen Arbeitszeiten sowie der Möglichkeit der digitalen Erfassung von Projekt- und/oder Arbeitszeiten wird eine höhere wahrgenommene Flexibilität der Mitarbeiter erreicht. Über diesen Kanal ergibt sich ein positiver Effekt auf Mitarbeiterbindung und Arbeitszufriedenheit. Mit stärkerer Nutzungsintensität mobiler IKT finden sich unerwünschte Wirkungen, wie ein Gefühl der ständigen Erreichbarkeit, die Erledigung von mehr Zusatzarbeit zu Hause sowie ein technologiegetriebener Arbeitsdruck.

Literatur

  1. Allen, D. K., & Shoard, M. (2005). Spreading the load: Mobile information and communications technologies and their effect on information overload. Information Research, 10(2), o. S.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baldwin, H. (2014). Ready for ‘Digital Transformation’? Computerworld, 48, 22–24.Google Scholar
  4. Baltes, B. B., Briggs, T. E., Huff, J. W., Wright, J. A., & Neuman, G. A. (1999). Flexible and compressed workweek schedules: A meta-analysis of their effects on work-related criteria. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(4), 496–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bennett, E. E. (2009). Virtual HRD: The intersection of knowledge management, culture, and intranets. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 11(3), 362–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bennett, E. E. (2010). The coming paradigm shift: Synthesis and future directions for virtual HRD. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 12(6), 728–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Biemann, T., & Weckmüller, H. (2015). Effektives Arbeiten, wann und wo man will? PERSONALquarterly, 67(2), 46–49.Google Scholar
  8. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  9. Boswell, W. R., & Olson-Buchanan, J. B. (2007). The use of communication technologies after hours: the role of work attitudes and work-life conflict. Journal of Management, 33(4), 592–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Christensen, T. H. (2009). ‘Connected presence’ in distributed family life. New Media & Society, 11(3), 433–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cohen-Charash, Y., & Spector, P. E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(2), 278–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cooper-Hakim, A., & Viswesvaran, C. (2005). The construct of work commitment: Testing an integrative framework. Psychological Bulletin, 131(2), 241–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Derks, D., & Bakker, A. B. (2014). Smartphone use, work-home interference, and burnout: A diary study on the role of recovery. Applied Psychology, 63(3), 411–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Destatis Statistisches Bundesamt. (2015). 13. koordinierte Bevölkerungsvorausberechnung bis 2060, Variante G1-L1-W1, Tabelle 12421-0002. https://www-genesis.destatis.de. Zugegriffen: 9. Dez. 2016.
  15. Duxbury, L. E., Higgins, C. A., & Thomas, D. R. (1996). Work and family environments and the adoption of computer-supported supplemental work-at-home. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eaton, S. C. (2003). If you can use them: Flexibility policies, organizational commitment, and perceived performance. Industrial Relations, 42(2), 145–167.Google Scholar
  17. Estes, W. R. (1990). A meta-analysis of the effects of flextime. Applied HRM Research, 1(1), 15–18.Google Scholar
  18. Felfe, J., Six, B., Schmook, R., & Knorz, C. (2002). Fragebogen zur Erfassung von affektivem, kalkulatorischem und normativem Commitment gegenüber der Organisation, dem Beruf/der Tätigkeit und der Beschäftigungsform (COBB). In D. Danner, & A. Glöckner-Rist (Hrsg.), Zusammenstellung sozialwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen, ZIS Version 15.00. Bonn: GESIS.Google Scholar
  19. Fenner, G. H., & Renn, R. W. (2004). Technology-assisted supplemental work: Construct definition and a research framework. Human Resource Management, 43(2/3), 179–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fenner, G. H., & Renn, R. W. (2010). Technology-assisted supplemental work and work-to-family conflict: The role of instrumentality beliefs, organizational expectations and time management. Human Relations, 63(1), 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Germain, M.-L., & McGuire, D. (2014). The role of swift trust in virtual teams and implications for human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 16(3), 356–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gold, M., & Mustafa, M. (2013). ‘Work always wins’: Client colonisation, time management and the anxieties of connected freelancers. New Technology, Work and Employment, 28(3), 197–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10(1), 76–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Grover, S. L., & Crooker, K. J. (1995). Who appreciates family-responsive human resource policies: The impact of family-friendly policies on the organizational attachment of parents and non-parents. Personnel Psychology, 48(2), 271–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975). Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(2), 159–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Harris, K. J., Marett, K., & Harris, R. B. (2011). Technology-related pressure and work-family conflict: Main effects and an examination of moderating variables. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(9), 2077–2103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hilbrecht, M., Shaw, S. M., Johnson, L. C., & Andrey, J. (2008). ‘I’m home for the kids’: Contradictory implications for work-life balance of teleworking mothers. Gender, Work and Organization, 15(5), 454–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hill, E. J., Ferris, M., & Märtinson, V. (2003). Does it matter where you work? A comparison of how three work venues (traditional office, virtual office, and home office) influence aspects of work and personal/family life. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63(2), 220–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Lang, K. R. (2005). Managing the paradoxes of mobile technology. Information Systems Management, 22(4), 7–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Karasek, R. A. (1979). Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(2), 285–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kelly, E. L., Moen, P., & Tranby, E. (2011). Changing workplaces to reduce work-family conflict: Schedule control in a white-collar organization. American Sociological Review, 76(2), 265–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kossek, E. E., Lautsch, B. A., & Eaton, S. C. (2006). Telecommuting, control, and boundary management: Correlates of policy use and practice, job control, and work-family effectiveness. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(2), 347–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lal, B., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2010). Investigating homeworkers’ inclination to remain connected to work at “anytime, anywhere” via mobile phones. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 23(6), 759–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lambert, S. J. (1990). Processes linking work and family: A critical review and research agenda. Human Relations, 43(3), 239–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Leonardi, P. M., Treem, J. W., & Jackson, M. H. (2010). The connectivity paradox: Using technology to both decrease and increase perceptions of distance in distributed work arrangements. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 38(1), 85–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Matusik, S. F., & Mickel, A. E. (2011). Embracing or embattled by converged mobile devices? Users’ experiences with a contemporary connectivity technology. Human Relations, 64(8), 1001–1030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(1), 20–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Niehoff, B. P., & Moorman, R. H. (1993). Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. The Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 527–556.Google Scholar
  40. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3. Aufl.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  41. Rennecker, J., & Godwin, L. (2005). Delays and interruptions: A self-perpetuating paradox of communication technology use. Information and Organization, 15(3), 247–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Richardson, K., & Benbunan-Fich, R. (2011). Examining the antecedents of work connectivity behavior during non-work time. Information and Organization, 21(3), 142–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rizzo, J. R., House, R. J., & Lirtzman, S. I. (1970). Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15(2), 150–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ruppel, C. P., Gong, B., & Tworoger, L. C. (2013). Using communication choices as a boundary-management strategy: How choices of communication media affect the work-life balance of teleworkers in a global virtual team. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 27(4), 436–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rüttgers, C., & Hochgürtel, K. (2017). New Work(ing Time): Was bedeutet die Digitalisierung der Arbeit für das Personalmanagement? Eine empirische Analyse der Einstellungen von Beschäftigten. In M. Zimmer & C. Rüttgers (Hrsg.), ipo Schriftenreihe der FOM (Bd. 1). Essen: MA Akademie Verlags- und Druck-Gesellschaft mbH.Google Scholar
  46. Schmidt, K.-H., Kleinbeck, U., Ottmann, W., & Seidel, B. (1985). Ein Verfahren zur Diagnose von Arbeitsinhalten: Der Job Diagnostic Survey (JDS). Psychologie und Praxis, Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 29, 162–172.Google Scholar
  47. Shockley, K. M., & Allen, T. D. (2007). When flexibility helps: Another look at the availability of flexible work arrangements and work–family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 71(3), 479–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sutherland, M., & Jordaan, W. (2004). Factors affecting the retention of knowledge workers. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 2(2), 55–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Syrek, C., Bauer-Emmel, C., Antoni, C., & Klusemann, J. (2011). Entwicklung und Validierung der Trierer Kurzskala zur Messung von Work-Life Balance (TKS-WLB). Diagnostica, 57(3), 134–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Thomas, L. T., & Ganster, D. C. (1995). Impact of family-supportive work variables on work-family conflict and strain: A control perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(1), 6–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Towers, I., Duxbury, L., Higgins, C., & Thomas, J. (2006). Time thieves and space invaders: Technology, work and the organization. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 19(5), 593–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Twenge, J. M. (2010). A review of the empirical evidence on generational differences in work attitudes. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(2), 201–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Twenge, J. M., Campbell, S. M., Hoffman, B. J., & Lance, C. E. (2010). Generational differences in work values: Leisure and extrinsic values increasing, social and intrinsic values decreasing. Journal of Management, 36(5), 1117–1142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Venkatesh, A., & Vitalari, N. P. (1992). An emerging distributed work arrangement: An investigation of computer-based supplemental work at home. Management Science, 38(12), 1687–1706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Waller, A. D., & Ragsdell, G. (2012). The impact of e-mail on work-life balance. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives, 64(2), 154–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Westphal, A. (2011). Ethikbasierte Unternehmensführung und Commitment der Mitarbeiter. Dissertation. Wiesbaden: Gabler.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wright, K. B., Abendschein, B., Wombacher, K., O’Connor, M., Hoffman, M., Dempsey, M., et al. (2014). Work-related communication technology use outside of regular work hours and work life conflict: The influence of communication technologies on perceived work life conflict, burnout, job satisfaction, and turnover intentions. Management Communication Quarterly, 28(4), 507–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.FOM HochschuleEssenDeutschland
  2. 2.FürthDeutschland

Personalised recommendations