Advertisement

How banks can shape their Management Control System to achieve more innovation: a case study

  • Sven Olaf Schmitz
  • Thomas Heupel
Chapter
Part of the FOM-Edition book series (FOMEDITION)

Abstract

New competitors from other industries increase the pressure on banks to offer more innovative solutions and services to their clients. In that context the design of bank’s Management Control System (MCS), seems to become more important as MCS provide the environment for managers and experts to create new ideas. As MCS in banks are almost without exceptions based on budgetary control, it seems reasonable to examine alternative MCS approaches that enable banks to become more competitive in terms of costumer relevant innovations. Thus, we ask how banks can redesign their MCS characteristics in order to enable more innovation and simultaneously ensure full compliance with regulations. To answer this question, we analyze case studies of a bank that applies a radical decentralized MCS and is perceived to be more responsive to its customers compared to its peers and at the same time fully compliant with European regulations. We find that banks may need to shape their MCS from a hierarchical centered command and control approach towards more social control. Moreover, our analysis suggests that putting more emphasis on social control mechanisms may enhance the efficiency of the remaining hierarchical control mechanisms.

References

  1. Amabile, T. M. (1998). How to kill creativity. Harvard Business Review, 76(5), 77–87.Google Scholar
  2. Bisbe, J., & Otley, D. (2004). The effects of the interactive use of management control systems on product innovation. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29(8), 709–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bjørnenak, T. (2013). Management accounting tools in banks: are banks without budgets more profitable? In Kaarbøe, K., Gooderham, P.N., Nørreklit, H. and (Keine Angabe) (Ed.), Managing in dynamic business environments: between control and autonomy (pp. 51–68). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  4. Bogsnes, B. (2009). Implementing beyond budgeting: unlocking the performance potential. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  5. Bogsnes, B. (2013). “Taking reality seriously – towards a more self-regulated management model at Statoil”. In K. Kaarbøe, P. N. Gooderham, H. Nørreklit & K. Angabe) (Eds.), Managing in dynamic business environments: between control and autonomy (pp. 11–33). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  6. Bourmistrov, A., & Kaarbøe, K. (2013). From comfort to stretch zones: a field study of two multinational companies applying “beyond budgeting” ideas. Management accounting research, 24(3), 196–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cabrera, Á., Collins, W. C., & Salgado, J. F. (2006). Determinants of individual engagement in knowledge sharing. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(2), 245–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cäker, M., & Siverbo, S. (2014). Strategic alignment in decentralized organizations – The case of Svenska Handelsbanken. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 30(2), 149–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Daum, J. H., & Francke, L. (2005). Ohne Budgets Managen bei Svenska Handelsbanken – Ein Interview mit Lennart Francke, CFO Svenska Handelsbanken, Stockholm. In J. H. Daum (Ed.), Beyond Budgeting: Impulse zur grundlegenden Neugestaltung der Unternehmensführung und -steuerung (pp. 127–138). München: Meidenbauer.Google Scholar
  10. Daum, J. H., & Hope, J. (2004). The Origins of Beyond Budgeting and of the Beyond Budgeting Round Table (BBRT) – An Interview with Jeremy Hope, co-founder and research director of the BBRT.Google Scholar
  11. Dunk, A. S. (2011). Product innovation, budgetary control, and the financial performance of firms. The British Accounting Review, 43(2), 102–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gooderham, P. N., Sandvik, A. M., Terjesen, S., & Nordhaug, O. (2013). The autonomy-creativity orientation of elite business school students in US and Norway”. In K. Kaarbøe, P. N. Gooderham, H. Nørreklit & K. Angabe) (Eds.), Managing in dynamic business environments: between control and autonomy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  13. Handelsbanken (2015). Annual Report 2015. Stockholm: Handelsbanken.Google Scholar
  14. Hope, J., & Fraser, R. (1998). BBRT Company Report # 2: Svenska HandelsbankenGoogle Scholar
  15. Hope, J., Bunce, P., & Röösli, F. (2011). The Leaders’s dilemma: how to build an empowered and adaptive oragnization without losing control. Chichester: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  16. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). strategic learning & the balanced scorecard. Strategy & Leadership, 24(5), 18–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kroner, N. (2011). A blueprint for better banking: Svenska Handelsbanken and a proven model for more stable and profitable banking. Petersfield, Hampshire: Harriman House.Google Scholar
  18. Libby, T., & Lindsay, R. M. (2010). Beyond budgeting or budgeting reconsidered? A survey of North-American budgeting practice. Management accounting research, 21(1), 56–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lindsay, R. M., & Libby, T. (2007). Svenska Handelsbanken: controlling a radically decentralized organization without budgets. Issues in Accounting Education, 22(4), 625–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Marginson, D., & Ogden, S. (2005). Budgeting and innovation. Financial Management, 34(14719185), 29–31.Google Scholar
  21. Martin, R. L. (2010). The execution trap. Harvard Business Review, 88(7/8), 64–71.Google Scholar
  22. McGregor, D. (1960). The human side of enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  23. Merchant, K. A., & Van der Stede, W. A. (2012). Management control systems: performance measurement, evaluation and incentives (3rd edn.). Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  24. Neilson, G. L., Martin, K. L., & Powers, E. (2008). The Secrets to Successful STRATEGY EXECUTION. Harvard Business Review, 86(6), 60–70.Google Scholar
  25. Olesen, A. (2013). Handelsbanken: consistency at its bestGoogle Scholar
  26. Pfläging, N. (2006). Führen mit flexiblen Zielen: Beyond Budgeting in der Praxis. Frankfurt: Campus.Google Scholar
  27. Rocksness, H. O., & Shields, M. D. (1988). An empirical of the expenditure budget in research and development. Contemporary Accounting Research, 4(2), 568–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schein, E. H. (1990). Organizational culture. American Psychologist, 45(2), 109–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wallander, J. (1999). Budgeting – an unnecessary evil. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 15(4), 405–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sven Olaf Schmitz
    • 1
  • Thomas Heupel
    • 2
  1. 1.HennefGermany
  2. 2.FOM Hochschule EssenEssenGermany

Personalised recommendations