Advertisement

Grenzüberschreitende Wertschöpfungsnetzwerke als Handlungsraum transnationaler Arbeitspolitik? Globale Rahmenabkommen und transnationale Gewerkschaftsnetzwerke unter der Lupe

  • Markus Helfen
Chapter

Zusammenfassung

Der nachfolgende Beitrag beleuchtet grenzüberschreitende Wertschöpfungsnetzwerke und die auf sie bezogenen globalen Rahmenabkommen als Teilarenen im Handlungsraum einer transnationalen Arbeitspolitik. Ins Zentrum der Betrachtung wird der Versuch einer organisationstheoretischen Fundierung der Handlungsmöglichkeiten von transnationalen Gewerkschaftsnetzwerken gestellt. Ausgehend von der nach wie vor mangelhaften Durchsetzung globaler Arbeitsstandards werden zunächst die besonderen arbeitspolitischen Herausforderungen von grenzüberschreitenden Wertschöpfungsnetzwerken dargestellt. Anschließend werden zwei illustrative Fälle von globalen Rahmenabkommen genutzt, um den Bedarf an interorganisationaler Zusammenarbeit deutlich zu machen. Darauf aufbauend werden organisationstheoretische Konzepte – Netzwerkverfassung, Management interorganisationaler Beziehungen und relationale Koordination – zu ihren Beiträgen befragt, den Aufbau und das Management handlungsfähiger transnationaler Gewerkschaftsnetzwerke zu unterstützen.

Schlüsselwörter

Internationale Arbeitsbeziehungen Arbeitsstandards ILO grenzüberschreitende Wertschöpfungsnetzwerke Multinationale Unternehmungen (MNU) globale Rahmenabkommen Rana Plaza Abkommen Siemens Gewerkschaftsnetzwerke Arena 

Literatur

  1. Accord on Fire and Building Safety. 2017. Quarterly aggregate report on remediation progress at RMG factories covered by the Accord. May, 8 2017. Dhaka und Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  2. Action Collaboration Transformation – ACT. 2017. Memorandum of understanding. May, 15, 2017. Berlin.Google Scholar
  3. AFL-CIO. 2017. At what cost? Workers report concerns about Volkswagen’s new manufacturing jobs in Tennessee. Washington.Google Scholar
  4. Alexander, R., S. Ashwin, N. Lohmeyer, C. Oka, und E. Schüßler. 2017. Analysing the Evolving Texture of Transnational Industrial Relations: Opening the Black Box of Interfirm and Firm-Union Relationships in the Global Garment Industry. Global garments working paper No. 1. Berlin.Google Scholar
  5. Andrijasevic, R., und D. Sacchetto. 2016. ‚Disappearing workers’: Foxconn in Europe and the changing role of temporary work agencies. Work, Employment and Society 31(1): 54–70.Google Scholar
  6. Anner, M., I. Greer, M. Hauptmeier, N. Lillie, und N. Winchester. 2006. The Industrial Determinants of Transnational Solidarity: Global Interunion Politics in Three Sectors. European Journal of Industrial Relations 12(1): 7–27.Google Scholar
  7. Anner, M., J. Bair, und J. Blasi. 2013. Toward joint liability in global supply chains: Addressing the root causes of labor violations in international subcontracting networks. Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal 35(1): 1–43.Google Scholar
  8. Anner, M. 2012. Corporate social responsibility and freedom of association rights: The precarious quest for legitimacy and control in global supply chains. Politics & Society 40(4): 609–644.Google Scholar
  9. Appelbaum, R.P., und N. Lichtenstein. 2016. Achieving workers’ rights in the global economy. Ithaca and London: ILR Press.Google Scholar
  10. Anderson, J. 2015. Towards resonant places: reflections on the organizing strategy of the International Transporter Workers’ Federation. Space and Polity 19(1): 47–61.Google Scholar
  11. BGMEA – Bangladesh Garment Manufacturers and exporters association. 2017a. BGMEA’s statement on the Ashulia incidents and its aftermath. www.bgmea.com.bd. Zugegriffen: 13. März 2017.
  12. BGMEA – Bangladesh Garment Manufacturers and exporters association. 2017b. BGMEA at a glance. www.bgmea.com.bd. Zugegriffen: 12. August 2017.
  13. Barrientos, S.W. 2013. ‚Labor chains‘: Analyzing the role of labour contractors in global production networks. Journal of Development Studies 49(8): 1058-1071.Google Scholar
  14. Black, J. 2008. Constructing and contesting legitimacy and accountability in polycentric regulatory regimes. Regulation & Governance 2(2): 137–164.Google Scholar
  15. Bourque, R. 2008. International framework agreements and the future of collective bargaining in multinational companies. Just Labour 12: 30–47.Google Scholar
  16. Chan J, P. Ngai, und M. Selden. 2013. The politics of global production: Apple, Foxconn and China’s new working class. New Technology, Work and Employment 26(2): 100–115.Google Scholar
  17. Coe, N.M., P. Dicken, und M. Hess. 2008. Global production networks: Realizing the potential. Journal of Economic Geography 8(31): 271–295.Google Scholar
  18. Coe, N. M., und D.C. Jordhus-Lier. 2011. Constrained agency? Re-evaluating the geographies of labour. Progress in Human Geography 35(2): 211–233.Google Scholar
  19. Cumbers A., C. Nativel, und P. Routledge. 2008. Labour agency and union positionalities in global production networks. Journal of Economic Geography 8(3): 369–387.Google Scholar
  20. Davidov, G. 2004. Joint employer status in triangular employment relationships. British Journal of Industrial Relations 42(2): 727–746.Google Scholar
  21. Davies, S., G. Williams, und N. Hammer. 2011. Organizing networks and alliances: Inter-national unionisms between the local and the global. In: Shaping Global Industrial Relations. The Impact of International Framework Agreements, Hrsg. K. Papadakis, 201–219. Geneva and London: ILO/Palgrave.Google Scholar
  22. Dehnen, V. 2013. Transnational alliances for negotiating International Framework Agreements: Power Relations and bargaining processes between Global union federations and European works councils. British Journal of Industrial Relations 51(3): 577–600.Google Scholar
  23. Donaghey J., und J. Reinecke. 2015. After Rana Plaza: Building coalitional power for labour rights between unions and (consumption-based) social movement organisations. Organization 22(5): 720–740.Google Scholar
  24. Donaghey J, J. Reinecke, C. Nifourou, und B. Lawson. 2014. From employment relations to consumption relations: Balancing labour governance in global supply chains. Human Resource Management 53(2): 229–252.Google Scholar
  25. Egels-Zandén, N. 2009. TNC motives for signing International framework agreements: A continuous bargaining model of stakeholder pressure. Journal of Business Ethics 84: 529–547.Google Scholar
  26. Dunlop, J.T. 1958. Industrial relations systems. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
  27. Fichter, M. 2015. Organising in and along Value Chains. Berlin: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.Google Scholar
  28. Fichter, M., M. Helfen, und J. Sydow. 2011. Employment relations in global production networks – Initiating transfer of practices via union involvement. Human Relations 63(4): 599–624.Google Scholar
  29. Fichter, M., und J.K. McCallum. 2015. Implementing global framework agreements: the limits of social partnership. Global Networks 15: 65–85.Google Scholar
  30. Fichter, M., und J. Sydow. 2002. Using networks towards global labor standards? Organizing social responsibility in global production chains. Industrielle Beziehungen 9(4): 357–380.Google Scholar
  31. Freeman, R.B., und M.M. Kleiner. 1990. Employer behavior in the face of union organizing drives. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 45(4): 351–365.Google Scholar
  32. Gereffi, G., J. Humphrey, und T. Sturgeon. 2005. The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy 12(1): 78–104.Google Scholar
  33. Giddens, A. 1984. The constitution of society. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  34. Gittel, J.H. 2016. Transforming relationships for high performance. The Power of Relational coordination. Stanford: Stanford Business.Google Scholar
  35. Hadwiger, F. 2015. Global framework agreements: Achieving decent work in global supply chains? International Journal of Labour Research 7(1–2): 75–94.Google Scholar
  36. Hammer, N. 2005. International Framework Agreements: Global industrial relations between rights and bargaining. Transfer 11(4): 511–530.Google Scholar
  37. Hatton, E. 2014. Temporary weapons: Employers’ use of temps against organized labor. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 67(1): 86–110.Google Scholar
  38. Helfen, M., M. Fichter, und J. Sydow. 2012. Anfänge einer Institutionalisierung grenzüberschreitender Arbeitsbeziehungen? Zur Paradoxie der Internationalen Rahmenabkommen im globalen Dienstleistungssektor. Industrielle Beziehungen 19(3): 290–313.Google Scholar
  39. Helfen, M. 2013. Tertialisierung von Wertschöpfungsnetzwerken: Eine globale Herausforderung für die Gewerkschaften. In: Arbeitsbeziehungen im Prozess der Globalisierung und Europäischen Integration. Ökonomische und soziale Herausforderungen im Zeichen der Euro-Krise. Festschrift für Hans-Wolfgang Platzer, Hrsg. S. Rüb und T. Müller, 81–96. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  40. Helfen, M., und M. Fichter. 2013. Building transnational union networks across global production networks: Conceptualising a new arena of labour-management relations. British Journal of Industrial Relations 51(3): 553–576.Google Scholar
  41. Helfen, M., E. Schüßler, und D. Stevis. 2016. Translating European labour relations practices to the United States through global framework agreements? German and Swedish multinationals compared. ILR Review 69(3): 631–655.Google Scholar
  42. Helfen, M., und J. Sydow. 2013. Negotiating as institutional work: The case of labour standards and international framework agreements. Organization Studies 34(8): 1073–1098.Google Scholar
  43. Herrnstadt, O. 2007. Are International Framework Agreements a path to corporate social responsibility? Journal of Business and Employment Law 10(1): 187–224.Google Scholar
  44. Hübner, C. 2015. Globale Wertschöpfungsketten organisieren. Eine neue Herausforderung für Gewerkschaften. Berlin: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.Google Scholar
  45. ILO – International Labour Office. 2016. Decent Work in Global Supply Chains. 105th International Labour Conference Session. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
  46. IndustriAll. 2017a. Rana Plaza – Tragic anniversary marks need for Accord to continue. www.industrial-union.org. Zugegriffen: 24. April 2017.
  47. IndustriAll. 2017b. Leading fashion brands join with unions to sign new Bagladesh Accord on Fire and Building Safety. www.industrial-union.org. Zugegriffen: 29. Juni 2017.
  48. Kalleberg, A.L. 2009. Precarious work, insecure workers: Employment relations in transition. American Sociological Review 74: 1–22.Google Scholar
  49. Lakhani, T., S. Kuruvilla, und A. Avgar. 2013. From the firm to the network: Global value chains and employment relations theory. British Journal of Industrial Relations 51(3): 440–472.Google Scholar
  50. Levesque, C., und G. Murray. 2010. Trade union cross-border alliances within MNCs: disentangling union dynamics at the local, national and international levels. Industrial Relations Journal 41(4): 312–332.Google Scholar
  51. Locke, R. M., B. Rissing, und T. Pal. 2013. Complements or substitutes? Private codes, state regulation and the enforcement of labour standards in global supply chains. British Journal of Industrial Relations 51(3): 519–552.Google Scholar
  52. Lüthje, B., und F. Butollo. 2017. Why the Foxconn model does not die: Production networks and labor relations in the IT industry in South China. Globalizations 14(2): 216–231.Google Scholar
  53. Maines, D.R. 1982. In search of meso-structure: Studies in the Negotiated Order. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography/Urban Life 11(3): 267–279.Google Scholar
  54. Maines, D.R., und J. Charlton. 1985. The negotiated order approach to the study of social organization. Studies in Symbolic Interaction 1: 271–308.Google Scholar
  55. Miller, D. 2004. Preparing for the long haul. Negotiating International Framework agreements in the global textile, garment and footwear sector. Global Social Policy 4(2): 215–239.Google Scholar
  56. Miller, D., und K. Hohenegger. 2017. Redistributing value added towards labour in apparel supply chains: Tackling low wages through purchasing practices. Conditions of Work and Employment series 83. Geneva: International Labour Office.Google Scholar
  57. Müller, T., H.-W. Platzer, und S. Rüb. 2004. Globale Arbeitsbeziehungen in globalen Konzernen? Zur Transnationalisierung betrieblicher und gewerkschaftlicher Politik. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
  58. Müller-Jentsch, W. 1997. Soziologie der Industriellen Beziehungen. Frankfurt und New York: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
  59. Mund, H., und K. Priegnitz. 2007. Soft law – second best solution or a privatisation of social rights? Some pointers for a future discussion. Transfer 13(4): 671–677.Google Scholar
  60. Mustchin, S., und M.M. Lucio. 2017. Transnational collective agreements and the development of new spaces for union action: The formal and informal uses of International and European framework agreements in the UK. British Journal of Industrial Relations 55(3): 577–601.Google Scholar
  61. Morris, T., und Z. Lancaster. 2005. Translating management ideas. Organization studies 27(2): 207–233.Google Scholar
  62. Niforou, C. 2012. International Framework Agreements and industrial relations governance: Global rhetoric versus local realities. British Journal of Industrial Relations 50(2): 352–373.Google Scholar
  63. OECD, WTO und World Bank Group. 2014. Global Value Chains: Challenges, Opportunities, and Implications for Policy. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  64. Platzer, H.-W., und T. Müller. 2011. Global and European Trade Union Federations. A Handbook and Analysis of Transnational Trade Union Organizations and Policies. Oxford: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  65. Pogge, T. 2011. Are we violating the Human Rights of the world’s poor? Yale Human Rights and Development Law Journal 14(2): 1–33.Google Scholar
  66. Provan, K.G., und P. Kenis. 2008. Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18(2): 229–252.Google Scholar
  67. Rainnie, A., A. Herod, und S. McGrath-Champ. 2011. Review and positions: Global production networks and labour. Competition and Change 15(2): 155–169.Google Scholar
  68. Riisgaard, L. 2005. International Framework Agreements: A new model for securing workers rights? Industrial Relations 44(4): 707–737.Google Scholar
  69. Ruggie, J.G. 2009. Protect, Respect and Remedy: A United Nations Policy Framework for Business and Human Rights. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting. American Society of International Law 103(March 25–28, 2009): 282–287.Google Scholar
  70. Sahlin-Andersson, K., und L. Engwall. 2002. The Expansion of Management Knowledge. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Sengenberger, W. 1994. Protection – Participation – Promotion: The systemic nature and effects of labour standards. In: Creating economic opportunities: The role of labour standards in industrial restructuring, Hrsg. W. Sengenberger und D. Campbell, 45–60. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
  72. Sengenberger, W. 2004. The system of international labour and social standards: How effective is it? Concepts and Transformation 9(3): 297–304.Google Scholar
  73. Scherer, A.G., und G. Palazzo. 2011. The new political role of business in a globalized world: A review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. Journal of Management Studies 48(4): 899–931.Google Scholar
  74. Siemens. 2016. Annual report. Ingenuity for Life. München.Google Scholar
  75. Siemens. 2012. Internationales Rahmenabkommen zwischen der Siemens AG, dem Gesamtbetriebsrat der Siemens AG, der IG Metall und der IndustriAll Global Union. 25. Juli 2012. München.Google Scholar
  76. Sobczak, A. 2012. Ensuring the effective implementation of transnational company agreements. European Journal of Industrial relations 18(2): 139–151.Google Scholar
  77. Stevis, D. 2010. International Framework Agreements and Global Social Dialogue: Parameters and Prospects. Employment Working Paper No. 47. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
  78. Strauss, A. 1982. Interorganizational negotiation. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography. Urban Life 11(3): 350–367.Google Scholar
  79. Sydow, J. 1992. Enterprise networks and co-determination: The case of the Federal Republic of Germany. In: Is the Single Firm Vanishing? Inter-Enterprise Networks, Labour and Labour Institutions, Hrsg. International Institute for Labour Studies, 34–61. Genf: ILO.Google Scholar
  80. Sydow, J., M. Fichter, M. Helfen, K.D. Sayım, und D. Stevis. 2014. Implementation of global framework agreements: Towards a multi-organizational practice perspective. Transfer 20(4): 489–503.Google Scholar
  81. Sydow, J., und M. Helfen. 2016. Production as a service. Plural network organisation as a challenge for industrial relations. Berlin: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.Google Scholar
  82. Sydow, J., und G. Möllering. 2015. Produktion in Netzwerken: Make, buy & cooperate. München: Vahlen.Google Scholar
  83. Sydow, J., und A. Windeler. 1998. Organizing and evaluating interfirm networks: A structurationist perspective on network processes and effectiveness. Organization Science 9(3): 265–284.Google Scholar
  84. Telljohann, V., I. da Costa, T. Müller, U. Rehfeldt, und R. Zimmer. 2009. European and international framework agreements: New tools of transnational industrial relations. Transfer 15(3–4): 505–525.Google Scholar
  85. Thomas, M.P. 2011. Global industrial relations? Framework agreements and the regulation of international labor standards. Labor Studies Journal 36(2): 269–287.Google Scholar
  86. Tørres, L, und S. Gunnes. 2003. Global Framework Agreements: A New Tool for International Labour. Oslo: Fafo.Google Scholar
  87. UNCTAD. 2013. World Investment Report 2013: Global Value Chains. Investment and Trade for Development. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar
  88. Weil, D. 2014. The fissured workplace. Why work became so bad for so many and what can be done to improve it. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  89. Weiss M. 2013. International labour standards: A complex public-private policy mix. International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations (29)1: 7–19.Google Scholar
  90. Williams, G., S. Davies, und C. Chinguno. 2015. Subcontracting and labour standards: Reassessing the potential of International Framework Agreements. British Journal of Industrial Relations 53(2): 181–203.Google Scholar
  91. Wills, J. 2002. Bargaining for the space to organize in the global economy: A review of the Accor-IUF trade union rights agreement. Review of International Political Economy 9(4): 675–700.Google Scholar
  92. Wirth, C. 2000. Industrielle Beziehungen als “negotiated order“. Industrielle Beziehungen 7(1): 43–68.Google Scholar
  93. Wright, C F., und S. Kaine. 2015. Supply chains, production networks and the employment relationship. Journal of Industrial Relations 57(4): 483–501.Google Scholar
  94. Yeung, H.W., und N.M. Coe. 2015. Toward a dynamic theory of global production networks. Economic Geography 91(1): 29–58.Google Scholar
  95. Young, I.M. 2004. Responsibility and global labor justice. Journal of Political Philosophy 12(4): 365–388.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universität InnsbruckInnsbruckÖsterreich

Personalised recommendations