The Imaginary of Resilience: Trauma, Struggle, Life

  • Julian ReidEmail author


As a culture we are saturated today by discourses around the need to develop the self. In fact discourses around selfhood can be seen to be driving wider social and political discourses around development on a more or less global scale. The discourse on ‘the resilient self’ is a case in point.


  1. Butler, J. & Athanasiou, A. (2013). Dispossession: The performative in the political. Oxford: Polity.Google Scholar
  2. Campbell, D. (1992). Writing security. Minneapolis: University of Minneosta Press.Google Scholar
  3. Chandler, D. (2013). Resilience: The governance of complexity. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cyrulnik, B. (2009). Resilience: How your inner strength can set you free from the past. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  5. Deleuze, G. (1989). Cinema 2: The time-image. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
  6. Delsarte, F. (2011). Delsarte system of expression. Milton Keynes: Lightning Source.Google Scholar
  7. Evans, B. & Reid, J. (2013). Resilient life: The art of living dangerously. Oxford: Polity.Google Scholar
  8. Frith, C. (2007). Making up the mind: How the brain creates our mental world. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  9. Giroux, H. A. (2014). ISIS and the spectacle of terrorism: Resisting mainstream workstations of fear.
  10. Harmanşah, Ö. (2015). ISIS, heritage, and the spectacles of destruction in the global media, Near Eastern Archaeology 78 (3), 170–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hobbes, T. (1993). Leviathan. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  12. Hollnagel, E., Woods, D. D., Leveson, N. (eds.). (2006). Resilience engineering: Concepts and precepts. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  13. Morton, A. (2013). Emotion and imagination. Oxford: Polity.Google Scholar
  14. National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United State. (2004). The 9/11 commission report: The full final report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States. New York: W. W. Norton and Co.Google Scholar
  15. Neocleous, M. (2013). Resisting Resilience. Radical Philosophy 178 (March/April), 1–7 (accessed on 19 March 2014).
  16. Neocleous, M. (2016). The universal adversary. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Rice, J. (2012). The Jarmusch way: Spirituality and imagination in Dead Man, Ghost Dog and Limits of Control. Lanham: Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar
  18. Slaby, J. (2015). Critical neuroscience meets medical humanities. Journal of Medical Humanities 41, 16–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Yusoff, K. & Gabrys, J. (2011). Climate change and the imagination. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews 2, 516–534.Google Scholar
  20. Zuboff, S. Z. (1988). In the age of the smart machine. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Univerity of LaplandRovaniemiFinland

Personalised recommendations