Theory, literature and methodology

Chapter
First Online:
Part of the Film und Bewegtbild in Kultur und Gesellschaft book series (BKG)

Abstract

Since the end of 20th century there has been a shift in focus from history to geography in the social sciences, a phenomenon that has been called the ‘spatial turn’ (Döring & Thielmann, 2008; Falkheimer & Jansson, 2006; Knowles, 2000; Warf & Arias, 2009). In combination with the ‘cultural turn’ that preceded it (Hall, 1990; Jameson, 1998; Oberg, 1960), the influence of the ‘spatial turn’ was apparent in the areas of both literary theory (e.g. Siegel, 1981; Timms & Kelley, 1985) and cinematic studies (e.g. Albrecht, 1986; Weiner, 1970) even earlier, and both the spatial connotations of the city and the symbolic meanings of landscape have been recognized in the humanities for quite some time.

Keywords

Place Attachment Taipei City Narrative Structure Tourism Research Destination Image 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahmed, Z.U. 1991. The influence of the components of a state’s tourist image on product positioning strategy. Tourism Management 12: 331- 340.Google Scholar
  2. Aitken, S.C., & Zonn, L.E. (Eds.). 1994. Place, Power, Situation and Spectacle. Maryland & London: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  3. Albrecht, D. 1986. Designing dreams: Modern architecture in the movies. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  4. AlSayyad, N. 2000. The cinematic city: Between modernist utopia and postmodernist dystopia. Built Environment 26(4): 268-281.Google Scholar
  5. Altman,I. & Low, S.M. 1992. Place attachment. New York, U.S.A.: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  6. Anderson, J. 2005. Edward Yang. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bachelard, G. 1964. The poetics of space (M. Jolas, Trans.). New York: The Orion Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bakhtin, M. M. 1981. Forms of time and of the chronotope in the novel. In The Dialogic imagination, Eds., M. Holquist (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.), 84–258. Austin: University of Texas Press.(Original work published 1936)Google Scholar
  9. Bal, M. & Bryson, N. 1991. Semiotics and art history. Art Bulletin 73: 174-208.Google Scholar
  10. Ball M. & Smith, G.W.H. 1992. Analyzing visual data. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Balshaw, M., & Kennedy, L. 2000. Urban space and representation. London: Pluto.Google Scholar
  12. Banks, M.& Morphy, H. 1997. Rethinking visual anthropology. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Bateson, G. & Mead, M. 1942. Balinese character: A photographic analysis. New York: New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  14. Barthes, R. 1967. Elements of semiology. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
  15. Barthes, R. 1973. Mythologies (A. Lavers, Trans.). London: Paladin.Google Scholar
  16. Barthes, R. 1991. The responsibility of forms: Critical essays on music, art and representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  17. Bauman, Z. 2004. Identity. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  18. Becker, H.S. 1981. Exploring society photographically. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  19. Becker, H.S. 1986. Photography and sociology. In Doing things together: Selected papers, H.S. Becker, 255-273. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Beeton, S. 2005. Film-Induced tourism. Clevedon: Channel View Publications.Google Scholar
  21. Beeton, S. 2010. The advance of film tourism. Tourism and Hospitality Planning & Development 7 (1): 1-6.Google Scholar
  22. Belting, H. 1994. Likeness and presence: A history of the image before the era of art (E. Jephcott, Trans.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  23. Benjamin, W. 1968. The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction. In Illuminations, Ed. A. Hannah, (Zohn, H. Trans.), 211-244. London: Fontana. (Original work published 1936)Google Scholar
  24. Bohnsack, R. 2003. Qualitative Methoden der Bildinterpretation. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft 5(2): 159-172.Google Scholar
  25. Bohnsack, R. 2006. Mannheims Wissenssoziologie als Methode. In Neue Perspektiven der Wissenssoziologie, Eds. D. Tänzler, H. Knoblauch, & H. Soeffner, 271-291. Konstanz: UVK.Google Scholar
  26. Bohnsack, R. 2008. The interpretation of pictures and the documentary method. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research 9(3): Art. 26,http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0803267. Retrieve on 20. July 2013.
  27. Bohnsack, R. 2009. Qualitative Bild-und Videointerpretation: Die ducumentarische Method. Opladen & Farming Hills: Verlage Barbara Budrich.Google Scholar
  28. Bramwell, B., & Rawding, L. 1996. Tourism marketing images of industrial cities. Annals of Tourism Research 23(1): 201- 221.Google Scholar
  29. Bruno, G. 1987. Ramble city: Postmodernism and Blade Runner. October 41: 61-74.Google Scholar
  30. Bruno, G. 1993. Street walking on a ruined map. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Buck-Morss, S. 1989. The dialectics of seeing: Walter Benjamin and the Arcades Project. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  32. Burda, H. 2011. The digital wunderkammer. Munich: Petrarca verlag.Google Scholar
  33. Busby, G., & Klug, J. 2001. Movie-induced tourism: The challenge of measurement and other issues. Journal of Vacation Marketing 7(4): 316–332.Google Scholar
  34. Calvino, I. 1974. Invisible cities (W. Weaver, Trans.). London: Secker & Warburg. (Original work published 1972)Google Scholar
  35. Carl, D., Kindon, S., & Smith, K. 2007. Tourists’ experiences of film locations: New Zealand as ‘Middle-Earth’. Tourism Geographies 9(1): 49–63.Google Scholar
  36. Cheatwood, D. & Stasz, C. (1979). Visual sociology. In Images of information: Still photography in the social sciences, Ed. Jon C. Wagner, 261-283. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  37. Chiao, P. 2007a. Open image in new window [A Brighter Summer Day: An era being ignored on purpose]. In Open image in new window [Edward Yang: Taiwan’s contribution to world film history], Ed. J. Huang, 101-116. Taipei: Yuesheng culture industry, Ltd.Google Scholar
  38. Chiao, P. 2007b. Open image in new window [Mahjong: Exploitation and manipulation of modern civilization]. In Open image in new window [Edward Yang: Taiwan’s contribution to world film history], Ed. J. Huang, 165-171. Taipei: Yuesheng culture industry, Ltd.Google Scholar
  39. Chou, T. L. 2005. The transformation of spatial structure: From a monocentric to a polycentric city. In Globalizing Taipei: The political economy of spatial development, Ed. R. Y. W. Kwok, 55–77. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Christopher, N. 1997. Somewhere in the night: Film noir and the American city. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  41. Christmann, G. B. 2008. The power of photographs of buildings in the Dresden urban discourse: Towards a visual discourse analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research 9(3): Art. 11, http://nbnresolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0803115. Retrieve on 20.July,2013.
  42. Chronis, A. 2012. Between place and story: Gettysburg as tourism imaginary. Annals of Tourism Research 39(4): 1797–1816.Google Scholar
  43. Collier, J. 1973. Alaskan Eskino education: A film analysis of cultural confrontation in the schools. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  44. Collier, J. 1979. Visual anthropology. In Images of information: Still photography in the social sciences, Ed. Jon C. Wagner, 271-282. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  45. Collier, J. & Collier, M. 1986. Visual anthropology: Photography as a research method. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
  46. Connell, J. 2012. Film tourism: Evolution, progress and prospects. Tourism Management 33(5): 1007–1029.Google Scholar
  47. Connell, J., & Meyer, D. 2009. Balamory revisited: An evaluation of the screen tourism destination-tourist nexus. Tourism Management 30: 194–207.Google Scholar
  48. Couldry, N. 1998. The view from inside the ‘simulacrum’: Visitors’ tales from the set of coronation street. Leisure Studies 17: 94–107.Google Scholar
  49. Crompton, J. L. 1979. An assessment of the image of Mexico as a vacation destination and the influence of geographical location upon the image. Journal of Travel Research 18(4): 18- 23.Google Scholar
  50. Dear, M.J. 2000. The postmodern urban condition. Oxford & Massachusetts: Blackwell publication.Google Scholar
  51. Davis, M. 2006. City of quartz: Excavating the future in Los Angeles (New ed.). London & New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  52. Davies, C.A. 1999. Using visual media. In Reflexive anthropology, Ed. C. A. Davies, 117-135. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  53. Dezin, N.K. 1991. Images of postmodern society: Social theory and contemporary cinema. London:Sage Publication.Google Scholar
  54. Dianne, D. & Claudio, M. 1997. Image and destination: A geographical approach applied to Banff National Park, Canada. Tourism Review 52(2): 14–24.Google Scholar
  55. Doel, M.A. & Clark,D.B. 1997. From ramble city to the screening of the eye: Blade Runner, death and symbolic exchange. In The Cinematic city, Ed. D.B. Clark, 141-168, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  56. Döring, J., & Thielmann, T. (Eds.). 2008. Spatial turn: das Raumparadigma in den Kultur-und Sozialwissenschaften. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag.Google Scholar
  57. Donald, A. 1986. Designing dreams: Modern architecture in the movies. New York, Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  58. Donald, J. 1999. Imagining the modern city. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  59. Easthope, A.(Ed.). 1993. Contemporary film theory. London & New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  60. Easthope, A. 1997. Cinécities in the sixties. In The cinematic city, Ed. D.B. Clark, 131-140. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  61. Emmison, M. & Smith, P. 2000. Researching the Visual. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  62. Fakeye, P.C., & Crompton, J.L. 1991. Image differences between prospective, first time, and repeat visitors to the Lower Rio Grande Valley. Journal of Travel Research 30(2): 10-16.Google Scholar
  63. Falkheimer, J., & Jansson, A. 2006. Geographies of communication: The spatial turn in media studies. Göteborg: Nordicom.Google Scholar
  64. Feldman, E.B., (Ed.). 1971. Varieties of visual experience: Art as image and idea. New York: Harry N. Abrams, Inc.Google Scholar
  65. Fridgen, J.D. 1987. Use of cognitive maps to determine perceived tourism region. Leisure Sciences 9(2): 101-117.Google Scholar
  66. Fyfe, N. R. (Ed.) 1999. Images of the street: Planning, identity and control in public space. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  67. Garfinkel, H. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  68. Goffman, E. 1979. Gender advertisements. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Goddard,W.G. 1966. Formosa: A study in Chinese History. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  70. Gunn, C. 1972.Vacationscape: Designing tourist regions. Austin: Bureau of Business Research, University of Texas.Google Scholar
  71. Hao, X., & Ryan, C. 2013. Interpretation, film language and tourist destinations: A case study of Hibiscus Town. Annals of Tourism Research 42: 334–358.Google Scholar
  72. Hall, S. 1990. The emergence of cultural studies and the crisis of the humanities. October 53: 11-23.Google Scholar
  73. Hall, S. 1997. Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  74. Harvey, D. 1990. The Condition of postmodernity: An enquiry into the origins of cultural change. Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  75. Heath, S. 1976. Narrative space. Screen 17(3): 68-112.Google Scholar
  76. Heath, C., & Hindmarsh, J. 2002. Analysing interaction: Video, ethnography and situated conduct. In Qualitative research in action, Ed. T. May, 99-121. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  77. Heath, C. & vom Lehn, D. 2004. Configuring reception: (Dis-)regarding the ‘Spectator’ in museums and galleries. Theory, Culture & Society 21(6): 43-65.Google Scholar
  78. Holden, A. 2005. Tourism studies and the social science. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  79. Hopkins, J. 1994. A mapping of cinematic places. In Place, power, situation and spectacle, Eds. S.C. Aitken & L.E. Zonn, 47-66, Maryland & London: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  80. Hodge, R. and Kress, G. 1988 Social semiotics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  81. Hou, J.S., Lin, C.H.,& Morais, D.B. 2005. Antecedents of attachment to a cultural tourism destination: the case of Hakka and Non-Hakka Taiwanese Visitors to Pei-Pu, Taiwan. Journal of Travel Research 44(2): 221-233.Google Scholar
  82. Hsu, J. 2005. A site of transnationalism in the ‘Ungrounded Empire’: Taipei as an interface city in the cross-border business networks. Geoforum 36: 654–666.Google Scholar
  83. Huang, T.Y. 2006. The cosmopolitan imaginary and flexible identities of global city regions: articulating new cultural identities in Taipei and Shanghai. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies 7(3): 472-491.Google Scholar
  84. Huang, J. 2007. Open image in new window [Edward Yang: Taiwan’s contribution to world film history]. Taipei: Yuesheng culture industry, Ltd.Google Scholar
  85. Huang, S.L, Wong, J.H., Chen, T.C. 1998. A framework of indicator system for measuring Taipei’s urban sustainability. Landscape and Urban Planning 42: 15-27.Google Scholar
  86. Huang,S.L., Wang, S.H., & Budd, W., 2009. Sprawl in Taipei’s peri-urban zone: Responses to spatial planning and implications for adapting global environmental change. Landscape and Urban Planning 90: 20–32.Google Scholar
  87. Hudson, S., & Ritchie, J. R. B. 2006. Promoting destinations via film tourism: An empirical identification of supporting marketing initiatives. Journal of Travel Research 44: 387–396.Google Scholar
  88. Hung,W.C., Chen,Y.C., & Cheng, K.C. 2010. Comparing land cover patterns in Tokyo, Kyoto, and Taipei: Using ALOS multispectral images. Landscape and Urban Planning 97: 132–145.Google Scholar
  89. Hunt, J.D. 1975. Image as a factor in tourism development. Journal of Travel Research 15: 1-7.Google Scholar
  90. Hunter, A. 1974. Symbolic communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  91. Imdahl, M. 1996. Giottos Arenafresken: Ikonographie, Ikonologie, Ikonik. München: Fink. (Original work published 1980)Google Scholar
  92. Jacobs, J. 1961. The death and life of great American cities. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  93. Jameson, F. 1988. Cognitive mapping. In Marxism and the interpretation of culture, Eds. C. Nelson, & L. Grossberg, 347-357. Urbana and Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  94. Jameson, F. 1991. Postmodernism, or, the cultural logic of late capitalism. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  95. Jameson, F. 1995. The geopolitical aesthetic: Cinema and space in the world system. London: British Film Institute.Google Scholar
  96. Jameson, F. 1998. The cultural turn: Selected writings on the Postmodern, 1983-1998. London & New York: Verso Books.Google Scholar
  97. Jim, C.Y. & Chen, W.Y. 2009. Diversity and distribution of landscape trees in the compact Asian city of Taipei. Applied Geography 29: 577–587.Google Scholar
  98. Kappelhoff, H. 2011.The Distribution of Emotions: Fassbinder and the Politics of Aesthetics. The Germanic Review: Literature, Culture, Theory 86(3):201-220.Google Scholar
  99. Keen, S. 2010. Narrative empathy. In Toward a cognitive theory of narrative acts, Ed. F. L. Aldama, 61-94. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  100. Kim, H. & Richardson, S. L. 2003. Motion picture impacts on destination images. Annals of Tourism Research 30(1): 216-237.Google Scholar
  101. Kim, S. 2012. Audience involvement and film tourism experiences: Emotional places, emotional experiences. Tourism Management 33: 376–387.Google Scholar
  102. Knapp,R.G.(Ed.).1980. China’s island frontier: Studies in the historical geography of Taiwan. Honolulu: The University Press of Hawaii.Google Scholar
  103. Knoblauch, H., Schnettler, B., Raab, J., & Soeffner, H. G. 2006. Video analysis: methodology and methods. Qualitative Audiovisual Data Analysis in Sociology. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.Google Scholar
  104. Knoblauch, H. & Schnettler, B. 2012. Videography: Analysing video data as a ‘focused’ ethnographic and hermeneutical exercise. Qualitative Research 12(3): 334–356.Google Scholar
  105. Knowles, A. K. 2000. Historical GIS: The spatial turn in social science history. Social Science History 24(3): 451-470.Google Scholar
  106. Konstantarakos, M. (Ed.). 2000. Spaces in European cinema. Exeter: Intellect Books.Google Scholar
  107. Labov, J. 2003. Kieslowski’s dialog, everyday life and the art of solidarity. In Screening the city, Eds. M. Shiel & T. Fitzmaurice, 113-134. London & New York: Verso Books.Google Scholar
  108. Lauterbur, P. 1973. Image formation by induced local interactions. Nature 242: 190-191.Google Scholar
  109. Lawson, F., & Baud-Bovy, M. 1977. Tourism and recreational development .London: Architectural Press.Google Scholar
  110. Lee, C. 2001. Predicting tourist attachment to destinations. Annals of Tourism Research 28: 229-232.Google Scholar
  111. Lefebvre, H. 1991. The production of space (D. Nicholson-smith, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, p.89.Google Scholar
  112. LeGates, T. R., & Stout, F. 2005. The city reader (3rd. ed.) London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  113. Lent, T.O. 1987. The dark side of the dream: The image of Los Angeles in film noir. Southern California Quarterly 69(4): winter, 329-348.Google Scholar
  114. Lewicka, M. 2011. Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years? Journal of Environmental Psychology 31: 207-230.Google Scholar
  115. Lin, L. 2007. Representing atrocity in Taiwan: The 2/28 Incident and White Terror in fiction and film. New York: Columbia UP.Google Scholar
  116. Lin, T. C., & Jhen, M. H. 2009. Inequity of land valuation in the highly developed city of Taipei, Taiwan. Land Use Policy 26: 662–668.Google Scholar
  117. Liu, S.T. 2013. Settler urban legacies: A case study of Taipei City. Cities 31: 239-247.Google Scholar
  118. Low, S. M. 1992. Symbolic ties that bind. Place Attachment: Human Behavior and Environment 12: 164-185.Google Scholar
  119. Lu, A. (Ed.). 2010. Taipei Filmmakers2007-. Taipei: Taipei City Department of Cultural Affairs & Taipei Film Commission.Google Scholar
  120. Lynch, K. 1960. The image of the city. Cambridge: The Technology Press and Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  121. MacCabe, C. 1995. Preface. In The geopolitical aesthetic: Cinema and space in the world system, F. Jameson, ix- xvi. London: British Film Institute.Google Scholar
  122. Macionis, N., & Sparks, B. 2009. Film-induced tourism: An incidental experience. Tourism Review International 13(2): 93–102.Google Scholar
  123. Mackay, G.L. 1895. From Far Formosa. The Caxton Press, New York.Google Scholar
  124. Mannheim, K. 1952. On the interpretation of Weltanschauung. In Essays in the sociology of knowledge, K. Mannheim, 33-83. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  125. Mannheim, K. 1980. Eine soziologische Theorie der Kultur und ihrer Erkennbarkeit (Konjunktives und kommunikatives Denken). In Karl Mannheim: Strukturen des Denkens, Eds. D. Kettler,V. Meja, N. Stehr, 155-322. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  126. Mannheim, K. 1982. Structures of thinking. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  127. Manzo, L. C., & Devine-Wright, P. 2014. Place attachment : Advances in theory, methods and applications. Oxon & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  128. Mayo, E. J., & Jarvis, J. P. 1981. The psychology of leisure travel. Boston: CBI.Google Scholar
  129. McArthur, C. 1997. Chinese boxes and Russian dolls. In The cinematic city, Ed. D.B. Clark, 19-44. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  130. Mead, M. 1963. Anthropology and the camera: In The encyclopedia of photography (Vol.1), Ed. W. D. Morgan. New York: Greystone Press.Google Scholar
  131. Mead, M. 1975. Visual anthropology in a discipline of words. In Principles of visual anthropology, Ed. P. Hockings, 3-10. Mouton: The Hague.Google Scholar
  132. Metz, C. 1964. Le cinéma: langue ou langage ? Communications 4: 52-90.Google Scholar
  133. Metz, C. 1974. Film language: A semiotics of the cinema (M. Taylor, Trans.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  134. Metz, C. 2002. Movies and methods: Selected works on semiotics (Y. Li, Trans.). Shanghai: Sanlian Bookstore Press.Google Scholar
  135. Mintzer, J. 2013. Will you still love me tomorrow? The Hollywood Reporter, Berlin Daily 11-02: 16-17.Google Scholar
  136. Mirzoeff, N. 1998. The visual culture reader. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  137. Mirzoeff, N. 1999. An introduction to visual culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  138. Monaco, J. 2009. How to read a film: Movies, media, multimedia. (4th ed.). London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  139. Mulvey, L. 1989. Visual and other pleasures. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  140. Natter, W. 1994. The city as cinematic space: Modernism and place in Berlin, symphony of a city. In Place, power, situation and spectacle, Eds. S. Aitkin & L. Zonn, 203- 227. Maryland & London: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  141. Neumann, D. (Ed.) 1996. Film architecture: Set design from Metropolis to Blade Runner. Munich & New YorK: Prestel.Google Scholar
  142. Oberg, K. 1960. Cultural shock: Adjustment to new cultural environments. Practical Anthropology 7(4): 177-182.Google Scholar
  143. Panofsky, E. 1955. Iconography and iconology: An introduction to the study of Renaissance art. In Meaning in the visual arts, E. Panofsky, 51-81. Harmondsworth & Middlesex: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  144. Pendergast, S. & Pendergast, T. (Eds). 2001. Edward Yang . In International Dictionary of Films and Filmmakers (Vol. 2: Directors). (4th ed.), 1092-1094. Detroit: St. James Press.Google Scholar
  145. Peucker, B. 2007. The material image: Art and the real in film. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  146. Penz, F., & Thomas, M. (Eds.). 1997. Cinema & architecture: Méliès, Mallet-Stevens, multimedia. London: British Film Institute.Google Scholar
  147. Pink, S. 2001. More visualizing, more methodologies: On video, reflexivity and qualitative research. Sociological Review 49(1): 586-59.Google Scholar
  148. Pink, S. 2007. Doing visual ethnography: Images, media and representation in research (2nd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  149. Pretes, M. 1995. Postmodern tourism: The Santa Claus industry. Annals of Tourism Research 22(1): 1–15.Google Scholar
  150. Proshansky, H. M., Fabian, A. K., & Kaminoff, R. 1983. Place-identity: Physical world socialization of the self. Journal of Environmental Psychology 3: 57-83.Google Scholar
  151. Riley, R., Baker, D., & van Doren, C. S. 1998. Movie-induced tourism. Annals of Tourism Research 25(4): 919–935.Google Scholar
  152. Rose, G. 2001. Visual methodologies: An introduction to the interpretation of visual methods (1st ed.). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  153. Said, E. W. 1994. Orientalism (Rev. ed.). New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  154. Salazar, N. 2012. Tourism imaginaries: A conceptual approach. Annals of Tourism Research 39(2): 863–882.Google Scholar
  155. Saussure, F. de 1959. Course in General Linguistics. New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
  156. Saxena, A., Chung, S.H., & Ng, A.Y. 2008. 3-D depth reconstruction from a single still Image. International Journal of Computer Vision 76: 53–69.Google Scholar
  157. Schnettler, B.& Raab, J. 2008. Interpretative visual analysis: Developments, state of the art and pending problems. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research 9(3): Art. 31. http://nbnresolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0803314.
  158. Selwyn, T. (Ed.) 1996. The tourist image: Myths and myth making in tourism. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  159. Shandley, R., Jamal, T., & Tanase, A. 2006. Location shooting and the filmic destination: Transylvanian myths and the post-colonial tourism enterprise. Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change 4(3): 137–158.Google Scholar
  160. Shepard, R.N. 1978.The mental image. American Psychologist 33(2): 125-137.Google Scholar
  161. Shiel, M., & Fitzmaurice, T. 2003. Screening the city. London & New York: Verso Books.Google Scholar
  162. Siegel, A. 1981. The image of the American city in popular literature, 1820-1870. New York & London: Kennikat Press.Google Scholar
  163. Slater, D. 1998. Analyzing cultural objects: Content analysis and semiotics. In Researching society and culture, Ed. C. Seale, 233-244. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  164. Smith,P. M. 2001. Transnational urbanism: Locating globalization. Massachusetts & Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  165. Stout, F. 2011. Visions of a new reality: The city and the emergence of modern visual culture. In The City Reader, Eds. T. R. LeGates & F. Stout (Rev.ed.), 147-150). London: Routledge. (Original work published 1999)Google Scholar
  166. Tay, W. S. 1995. Ideology, identity, and architecture: Modernism, postmodernism, and antiquarianism in Taiwan. The Humanities Bulletin 4: 85–96.Google Scholar
  167. Timms, E., & Kelley, D. (Eds.). 1985. Unreal city: Urban experience in modern European literature and art. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  168. Toy, M. (Ed.). 1994. Architecture and film. London: Academy Editions, New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  169. Tuan,Y. 1974. Topohilia: A study of environmental perception attitudes, and values. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.Google Scholar
  170. Tuan, Y. 1975. Place: An experiential perspective. Geographical Review 65: 151-165.Google Scholar
  171. Tuan,Y. 1977. Space and place: The perspective of experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  172. Van Fraassen, B.C. 1980. The scientific image. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  173. Vidler, A. 1993. The explosion of space: Architecture and the filmic imaginary. Assemblage (21): 45-59.Google Scholar
  174. Wagner-Willi, M. 2006. On the multidimensional analysis of Video-Data: Documentary interpretation of interaction in schools. In Video analysis: Methodology and methods, Eds. H. Knoblauch, B. Schnettler,J. Raab, & H. Soeffner, 143-153. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  175. Warf, B., & Arias, S. (Eds.). 2009. The spatial turn: Interdisciplinary perspectives. Oxon & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  176. Weickert, J. 2008. Anisotropic diffusion in image processing. Stuttgart: B. G. Teubner.Google Scholar
  177. Weiner, H.R. 1970. The Cinema and the city. Journal of Popular Culture 3: 825.Google Scholar
  178. Weng, J. 2006. Origins of the Name Formosa. Open image in new window (Han Lin She Hui Tian Di) 5: 2.Google Scholar
  179. Williamson, J.E. 1978. Decoding advertisements: Ideology and meaning in advertising. London: Marion Boyars.Google Scholar
  180. Williams, D. R., Patterson M. E., Roggenbuck J. H. and Watson. 1992. Beyond the commodity metaphor: examining emotional and symbolic attachment to place. Leisure Sciences 14: 29-46.Google Scholar
  181. Wolf, A.P. 1978. Studies in Chinese society. Stanford, Califonia: Stanford UP.Google Scholar
  182. Wollen, P. 1972. Signs and Meaning in the Cinema. London: Secker and Warburg.Google Scholar
  183. Wulf, C. 1999. Bild und Phantasie. Zur historischen Anthropologie des Bildes. In Bild-Bilder-Bildung, Eds. G. Schäfer/ C. Wulf, 331-344. Weinheim: Deutscher Studienverlag.Google Scholar
  184. Yeh, E. Y., & Davis, D. W. 2005. Taiwan film directors: A treasure island. New York: Columbia University press.Google Scholar
  185. Zenon, P. 2003. Return of the mental image: Are there really pictures in the brain? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7(3): 113–118.Google Scholar
  186. Žižek, S. 2001. The fright of real tears: Krzysztof Kieślowski between theory and post-theory. London: BFI Publishing.Google Scholar
  187. Žižek, S. 2007. Forword. In Sociology through the projector, B. Diken & C. A. Laustsen, viii-xi. Oxon& New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Tourism ManagementSun Yat-Sen UniversityGuangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations