Advertisement

Tablets im Schulunterricht in Skandinavien

Der Ansatz des Digitalen Didaktischen Design (DDD) für empirische Studien: Designs-in-Practice
  • Isa JahnkeEmail author
Chapter

Zusammenfassung

Durch den Einsatz von internetfähigen Tablets in Schulen verschmelzen tradierte Klassenräume mit Onlineräumen; es entstehen neue Klassenräume: CrossActionSpaces. Unter dieser Bedingung werden 64 skandinavische Schulklassen exploriert. Leitend ist die Fragestellung, auf welche Weise Lehrpersonen iPads in ihren Unterricht integrieren. Die Forschungsmethode umfasst teilstrukturierte Unterrichtsbeobachtungen (Foto, Audio-, Videomitschnitte) sowie Interviews. Die Ergebnisse lassen neue Unterrichtsdesigns in Form von Lernexpeditionen erkennbar werden sowie drei Cluster von Designs-in-practice: a) neue Designs; Learning by CrossAction, b) tradierte Unterrichtsdesigns, die zu Irritationen und Konflikten in iPad-Klassen führen, und c) Designs, die aus unterschiedlichen Gründen zwischen Innovation und Tradition verharren.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Arnold, R., & Schüßler, I. (2003). Ermöglichungsdidaktik. Erwachsenenpädagogische Grundlagen (S. 249-260). Hohengehren: Schneider.Google Scholar
  2. Barr, R., & Tagg, J. (1995): From teaching to learning. A new paradigm for undergraduate education. In D. DeZure (Hrsg.), Learning from Change. Change Magazine, 198- 200.Google Scholar
  3. Bauer, M., & Gaskell, G. (2000). Qualitative Researching with text, image and sound. London: Sage. Google Scholar
  4. Bergström, P. (2012). Designing for the Unknown. Didactical Design for Process-based Assessment in Technology-Rich Learning Environments. Umeå: University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2007): Teaching for Quality Learning at University. 3rd Ed., New York.Google Scholar
  6. Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay Co Inc.Google Scholar
  7. Bocconi, S,, Kampylis, P., & Punie, Y. (2013). Framing ICT-enabled Innovation for Learning: the case of one-to-one learning initiatives in Europe. European Journal of Education 48(1), 113-130. doi: http:77dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12021
  8. Buchem, I., Jahnke, I., & Pachler, N. (2013). Guest editorial preface. SI Mobile Learning and Creativity. In International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning 5(3).Google Scholar
  9. Chou, C. C., Block, L., & Jesness, R. (2012). A case study of mobile learning pilot project in K-12 schools. In Journal of Educational Technology Development 5(2), 11-26.Google Scholar
  10. Ciampa, K. (2014). Learning in a mobile age: an investigation of student motivation. Journal of Computer Assissted Learning 30, 82-96. doi:  10.1111/jcal.12036
  11. De Chiara, R., Di Matteo, A., Manno, I., & Scarano, V. (2007). CoFFEE: Cooperative Face-2Face educational environment. In Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing, 2007 Conference, pp. 243-252, doi:  10.1109/COLCOM.2007.4553836
  12. Dohn, N., & Hansen, J. J. (2014). Is learning designs something you think, do, live with, react to, or conceptualize with? In Designs for Learning, 4th Conference in Stockholm. http://www.designsforlearning.nu/conference/program/pdf_webb/bonderupdohn_hansen.pdf. Zugegriffen 8.5.2014.
  13. Duffy, T. M., & Cunningham, D. J. (1996). Constructivism: Implications for the design and delivery of instruction. In Jonassen, D. H. (Ed): Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology (S. 170-198). New York: Simon & Shuster Macmillan.Google Scholar
  14. Falloon, G. (2015). What’s the difference? Learning collaboratively using iPads in conventional classrooms. Computers & Education 84, 62-77. doi:  10.1016/j.compedu.2015.01.010
  15. Fischer, G. (2013). A Conceptual Framework for Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning at Work. In S. Goggins, I. Jahnke, & V. Wulf (Hrsg.), Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning at the Workplace (CSCL@Work) (S. 23-43). Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  16. Floridi, L. (2014). The Fourth Revolution – How the infosphere is reshaping human reality. Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Haßler, B, Major, L, & Hennessy, S. (2015). Tablet use in schools: A critical review of the evidence for learning outcomes. Journal of Computer Assissted Learning. https://larrycuban.files.wordpress.com/2015/08/hassler_major_hennessy_2015-_tablet_use_in_schools_a_critical_review_of_the_evidence_for_learning_outcomes-fc4.pdf. Zugegriffen 10.12.2015.
  18. Howland, J., Jonassen, D., & Marra, R. (2012). Meaningful Learning with Technology, 4th ed. Pearson.Google Scholar
  19. Hudson, B. (2008). A Didactical Design Perspective on Teacher Presence in an International Online Learning Community. Journal of Research in Teacher Education, 2008 Umeå University, Vol. 15, Issue 3-4, 93-112.Google Scholar
  20. Ifenthaler, D., & Schweinbenz, V. (2013). The acceptance of Tablet-PCs in classroom instruction: The teachers’ perspectives. In Computers in Human Behavior 29(3), 525-534.Google Scholar
  21. Jahnke, I. (2016, printed in Sept 2015). Digital Didactical Designs. Teaching and Learning in CrossActionSpaces. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Jahnke, I., & Kumar, S. (2014). Digital Didactical Designs: Teachers’ Integration of iPads for Learning-Centered Processes. In Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, Vol. 30, Issue 3, 81-88. dx.doi.org/ 10.1080/21532974.2014.891876
  23. Jahnke, I., Norqvist, L., & Olsson, A. (2014). Digital Didactical Designs of Learning Expeditions. In C. Rensing et al. (Hrsg.), Open Learning and Teaching in Educational Communities. The 9th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, EC-TEL 2014, Graz, Austria, September 16-19, 2014, Proceedings. LNCS Vol. 8719, 165-178.Google Scholar
  24. Jahnke, I., Svendsen, N. V., Johansen, S. K., & Zander, P. O. (2014). The Dream About the Magic Silver Bullet: the Complexity of Designing for Tablet-Mediated Learning. In Proceeding Group’14, Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Supporting Group Work, S. 100-110, ACM New York, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2660398.2660404.
  25. Jahnke, I., & Norberg, A. (2013). Digital Didactics – Scaffolding a new Normality of Learning. In Open Education 2030 – contributions to the JRC-IPTS Call for Vision Papers. Part III: Higher Education, S. 129-134.Google Scholar
  26. Jonassen, D., Howland J., Moore, J., & Marra, R. (2003). Learning to solve problems with technology: A constructivist perspective (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  27. Kaganer, E., Giordano, G. A., Brion, S., & Tortoriello, M. (2013). Communications of the ACM, Vol. 56, No. 11, 68-75. DOI10.1145/2500494Google Scholar
  28. Klafki, W. (1963). Studien zur Bildungstheorie und Didaktik. (Studies of education theory and didactics). Weinheim: Beltz.Google Scholar
  29. Laurillard, D. (2008). Technology enhanced learning as a tool for pedagogical innovation. In Journal of Philosophy of Education, 42 (3-4), 521-533.Google Scholar
  30. Luhmann, N. (1984). Soziale Systeme, Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  31. Lund, A., & Hauge, T. E. (2011). Designs for teaching and learning in technology-rich learning environments. Nordic journal of digital literacy (4), 258-272.Google Scholar
  32. Marton, F., & Säljo, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: I – Outcome and process. In British Journal of Educational Psychology 46, 4-11.Google Scholar
  33. Mor, Y., & Winters, N. (2011). Design approaches in technology-enhanced learning. Interactive Learning Environments 15(1), 6175.Google Scholar
  34. Norqvist, L., Jahnke, I., & Olsson, A. (2014). The Learners’ Expressed Values of Learning in a Media Tablet Learning Culture. In C. Rensing et al. (Hrsg.): Open Learning and Teaching in Educational Communities. The 9th EC-TEL 2014, European Conference on Technology-Enhanced Learning. LNCS Vol. 8719, Graz/Austria, Sept. 2014. Springer.Google Scholar
  35. Olofsson, A. D., & Lindberg, O. J. (2012). Informed Design of Educational Technologies in Higher Education: Enhanced Learning and Teaching, Hershey: IGI Global.Google Scholar
  36. Preece, J., Abras, Ch., & Maloney-Krichmar, D. (2004). Designing and evaluating online communities: Research speaks to emerging practice. In International Journal of Web based Communities 1, 2-18.Google Scholar
  37. Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  38. Traxler, J., & Kukulska-Hulme, A. (Hrsg.) (2016). Mobile Learning –the Next Generation. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Webb, M., & Cox, M. (2004). A Review of Pedagogy Related to Information and Communications Technology. In Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13,(3), 235-286.Google Scholar
  41. Wildt, J. (2007). On the Way from Teaching to Learning by Competences as Learning Outcomes. In Pausits, A., & Pellert, A. (Hrsg.), Higher Education Management and Development in Central, Southern and Eastern Europe (S. 115-123). Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MissouriColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations