Introduction

Chapter
Part of the Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft book series (VGPO)

Abstract

On December 1, 2013, the Croatian voters adopted a constitutional amendment in a referendum. It changed Art. 62 of the Croatian constitution, declaring marriage a union between a woman and a man.

Keywords

Comparative Politics Constitutional Amendment Constitutional Change Constitutional Order Constitutional Development 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Albi, Anneli. 2005. EU Enlargement and the Constitutions of Central and Eastern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arato, Andrew. 2000. Civil Society, Constitution, and Legitimacy. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  3. Arato, Andrew. 2012. Conventions, Constituent Assemblies, and Round Tables. Models, Principles and Elements of Democratic Constitution-Making. Global Constitutionalism 1(1): 173–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Banting, Keith G., and Richard Simeon. 1985. Introduction: The Politics of Constitutional Change. In The Politics of Constitutional Change in Industrial Nations. Redesigning the State, ed. idem, 1–29. London, Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  5. Behnke, Nathalie. 2009. Agenda-Setting für Verfassungsreformen. Jahrbuch für Handlungs- und Entscheidungstheorie 5: 7–50.Google Scholar
  6. Behnke, Nathalie, Bettina Petersohn, Andrea Fischer-Hotzel, and Dominic Heinz. 2011. Measuring Success of Constitutional Reforms. Evidence from Territorial Reforms in Eight Western Democracies. Regional and Federal Studies 21(4): 443–473.Google Scholar
  7. Benz, Arthur, and Nathalie Behnke. 2009. The Politics of Constitutional Change between Reform and Evolution. Publius 39(2): 213–240.Google Scholar
  8. Benz, Arthur, and Felix Knüpling (eds.). 2012. Changing Federal Constitutions. Lessons from International Comparison. Leverkusen: Barbara Budrich.Google Scholar
  9. Blokker, Paul. 2014. New Democracies in Crisis? A Comparative Constitutional Study of the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania and Slovakia. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Bos, Ellen, and Kálmán Pócza (eds.). 2014. Verfassunggebung in konsolidierten Demokratien. Neubeginn oder Verfall eines politischen Systems? Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  11. Busch, Andreas. 2006. Verfassungspolitik: Stabilität und permanentes Austarieren. In Regieren in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland: Innen- und Außenpolitik seit 1949, ed. Manfred G. Schmidt, and Reimut Zohlnhöfer, 33–56. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carothers, Thomas. 2002. The End of the Transition Paradigm. Journal of Democracy 13(1): 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Contiades, Xenophon (ed.). 2013. Engineering Constitutional Change. A Comparative Perspective on Europe, Canada, and the USA. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Dressel, Björn, and Marco Bünte. 2014. Constitutional Politics in Southeast Asia: From Contestation to Constitutionalism? Contemporary Southeast Asia 36(1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Elkins, Zachary, Tom Ginsburg, and James Melton. 2009. The Endurance of National Constitutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Elster, Jon. 1993. Constitution-Making in Eastern Europe: Rebuilding the Boat in the Open Sea. In Administrative Transformation in Central and Eastern Europe. Towards Public Sector Reform in Post-Communist Societies, ed. Joachim Jens Hesse, 169–217. Oxford, Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  17. Ginsburg, Tom (ed.). 2012. Comparative Constitutional Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Ginsburg, Tom, and James Melton. 2015. Does the Constitutional Amendment Rule Matter at All? Amendments Cultures and the Challenges of Measuring Amendment Difficulty”. International Journal of Constitutional Law 13(3): 686–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ginsburg, Tom, and Alberto Simpser (eds.). 2014. Constitutions in Authoritarian Regimes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Holmes, Stephen, and Cass Sunstein. 1995. The Politics of Constitutional Revision in Eastern Europe. In Responding to Imperfection. The Theory and Practice of Constitutional Amendment, ed. Sanford Levinson, 275–306. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Karlsson, Christer. 2016. Explaining constitutional change: Making sense of cross-national variation among European Union member states. Journal of European Public Policy 23(2): 255–275.Google Scholar
  22. Kitschelt, Herbert. 1994. Rationale Verfassungswahl? Zum Design von Regierungssystemen in neuen Konkurrenzdemokratien. Berlin: Humboldt-Universität.Google Scholar
  23. Köppl, Stefan. 2003. Italien: Transition ohne Reform? Gescheiterte Anläufe zur Verfassungsreform 1983–1998 im Vergleich. Stuttgart: ibidem.Google Scholar
  24. Lorenz, Astrid. 2005. How to Measure Constitutional Rigidity: Four Concepts and Two Alternatives. Journal of Theoretical Politics 17(3): 339–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lorenz, Astrid. 2008. Verfassungsänderungen in etablierten Demokratien. Motivlagen und Aushandlungsmuster. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  26. Lorenz, Astrid. 2011. Systemwechsel und Verfassungsentwicklung. In Regierungssysteme in Mittel- und Osteuropa: Die neuen EU-Staaten im Vergleich, ed. Florian Grotz and Ferdinand Müller-Rommel, 47–67 and 326–328. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  27. Lorenz, Astrid, and Wenke Seemann. 2009. Verfassungspolitische Konjunkturzyklen? Überlegungen zur Wirkungsweise konstitutioneller Rigidität. Jahrbuch für Handlungs- und Entscheidungstheorie 5: 55–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lutz, Donald S. 1995. Toward a Theory of Constitutional Amendment. In Responding to Imperfection. The Theory and Practice of Constitutional Amendment, ed. Sanford Levinson, 237–274. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Mahoney, James, and Kathleen Thelen. 2010. A Gradual Theory of Institutional Change. In Explaining Institutional Change. Ambiguity, Agency and Power, ed. idem, 1–37. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Merkel, Wolfgang. 2010. Systemtransformation. Eine Einführung in die Theorie und Empirie der Transformationsforschung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2nd ed.Google Scholar
  31. Negretto, Gabriel L. 2014. Making Constitutions: Presidents, Parties, and Institutional Choice in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Nolte, Detlef, and Almut Schilling-Vacaflor (eds.). 2012. New Constitutionalism in Latin America. Promises and Practices. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  33. Oliver, Dawn, and Carlo Fusaro (eds.). 2011. How Constitutions Change. A Comparative Study. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
  34. Petersohn, Bettina. 2013. Konfliktregulierung in multinationalen Demokratien: Föderalismus und Verfassungsreformprozesse in Kanada und Belgien im Vergleich. Baden-Baden: Nomos.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Qvortrup, Matt (ed.). 2013. The British Constitution. Continuity and Change. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
  36. Rasch, Bjørn Erik, and Roger D. Congleton. 2006. Amendment Procedures and Constitutional Stability. In Democratic Constitutional Design and Public Policy. Analysis and Evidence, ed. Roger D. Congleton and Birgitta Swedenborg, 319–342. Cambridge/Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  37. Roberts, Andrew. 2009. The Politics of Constitutional Amendment in Postcommunist Europe. Constitutional Political Economy 20(2): 99–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Roznai, Yaniv. 2013. Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments—The Migration and Success of a Constitutional Idea. American Journal of Comparative Law 61(3): 657–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sadurski, Wojciech. 2012. Constitutionalism and the Enlargement of Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sartori, Giovanni. 1997. Comparative Constitutional Engineering. An Inquiry into Structures, Incentives and Outcomes. New York: New York University Press, 2nd ed.Google Scholar
  41. Topidi, Kyriaki, and Alexander H.E. Morawa (eds.). 2011. Constitutional Evolution in Central and Eastern Europe. Expansion and Integration in the EU. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  42. Tóth, Gábor Attila (ed.). 2012. Constitution for a Disunited Nation. On Hungary’s 2011 Fundamental Law. Budapest: CEU Press.Google Scholar
  43. von Blumenthal, Julia, and Stephan Bröchler (eds.). 2010. Föderalismusreform in Deutschland. Bilanz und Perspektiven im internationalen Vergleich. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  44. von Bogdandy, Armin, and Pál Sonnevend (eds.). 2015. Constitutional Crisis in the European Constitutional Area. Theory, Law and Politics in Hungary and Romania. Oxford, Portland: Hart.Google Scholar
  45. Wikipedia. 2015. Same-sex marriage. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Same-sex_marriage (accessed December 31, 2015).
  46. Yap, Po Jen. 2015. The Conundrum of Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments. Global Constitutionalism 4(1): 114–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut für SozialwissenschaftenHumboldt-Universität zu BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations